this post was submitted on 01 May 2026
308 points (97.0% liked)

Selfhosted

58915 readers
771 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

i love selfhosting :3

top 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] OR3X@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Mine is just Debian.

[–] mpramann@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What is your reason for running two separate Debian docker hosts with under 5 containers in total? That seems like quite the overhead? And why did you choose to install Nextcloud on your TrueNAS server?

[–] RecallMadness@lemmy.nz 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not OP. But i do the same.

I have multiple proxmox hosts, running multiple VMs, each running containers.

I do it so I can minimise disruption. Fixing a fault in immich doesn’t mean the house is without plex for a week.

[–] mpramann@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 18 hours ago

Running multiple Proxmox hosts in a cluster makes sense so you can swap VMs from one the other and have extra hardware reliability. I'd also get grouping your containers on different Docker VMs the apply the same security rules to containers in a group (internally vs. externally available for example). But how does a faulty Immich container take down a Plex container?

[–] madejackson@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Nice setup.

Though in terms of manageability it looks like a nightmare.

Cosmos Cloud You can thank me later ;) or azukaar for that matter.

And Cosmos OpenWrt for the ultimate all in one OS (my creation)

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 36 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Why do you use two separate Debian VMs plus a truenas VM running nextcloud?

[–] Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Security is the first thing that comes to mind. Compartmentalization prevents or at least makes it considerably harder for compromised services to screw up all the others.

Another thing would be that it might be easier to manage backups and snapshots.

[–] jimerson@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

From my understanding, it's helpful that each VM will have its own IP so ports can be opened only on specific VMs, increasing overall security.

[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You should look into container technology. No reason to have this many operating systems wasting resources

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca -4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Heh. Container mafia going "hush, don't worry about iso27002, just one more pull, bro."

[–] HereIAm@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

OP is still running 5 containers though? And why does a home server need to implement an IT security standard meant for large organisations? I hope you got an incident response policy written down, would be a shame to fail the next audit.

[–] Bahnd@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Public facing services should pantamime security best practices. I recognize its not realistic for most solo-home labs, but you can always improve with practice.

[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago

Tell me again why a properly managed container environment (if you wanna go bonkers use Jails on FreeBSD) offers more attack surface than multiple operating systems running the exact same software.

Just randomly mentioning ISO27x tells me exactly that you have absolutely no idea how those standards work.

[–] amniote@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

" Why won't somebody think about the backups ? "

None of you come in my shop.

[–] Cyber@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago

Or the restores... 😉

[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] Bahnd@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago
[–] lando55@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

🤦🏼‍♂️

[–] renegadespork@lemmy.jelliefrontier.net 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Nice stack! What's the crab logo? I don't recognize it.

Do you notice a massive increase in request latency (like 10x-50x) when using a CloudFlare tunnel vs connecting directly to your IP? I've experimented with it a few times, but it really negatively impacts QoS for me, especially with federated services (like Matrix) where there are lots of small requests.

[–] blinfabian@feddit.nl 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

the crab is Homarr and no, i haven't had any issues with cloudflare

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] blinfabian@feddit.nl 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

its a dashboard application, i just have my hosted apps there

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

But like, does it help you with anything specific. Or is it just nice to look at

Thanks! I haven’t tried that dashboard yet, I might give it a spin.

[–] irmadlad@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Do you notice a massive increase in request latency (like 10x-50x) when using a CloudFlare tunnel

Have not noticed that at all. I don't run any federated services tho. Might be the difference, I don't know.

[–] renegadespork@lemmy.jelliefrontier.net 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah I’m thinking the request frequency was the issue rather than bandwidth.

[–] timwa@lemmy.snowgoons.ro 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

That seems unlikely; trust me, there are services running behind Cloudflare tunnels that are doing more requests per second than whatever you're hosting does in a year.

The only times I've had performance problems with Cloudflare tunnels it's been intermediate network kit that didn't like IPv6 or didn't like QUIC (or both). You can try disabling both in cloudflared to diagnose (at least, you used to be able to disable them/switch to HTTP/2+IPv4, it's been a very long time since I've needed to so I'm just assuming it's still an option.)

My ISP is stuck in the Stone Age and doesn’t support IPv6, so I’ll look into that.

[–] JetpackJackson@feddit.org 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] blinfabian@feddit.nl 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] irmadlad@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

i love selfhosting :3

Me2! Nice solid stack you got going there bro.

[–] freddo@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Is proxmox a viable option to be used on a NUC for example?

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yes, I run it on mine, with an N100 processor. Make sure it's a recent-ish one with the necessary virtualization extensions. https://www.proxmox.com/en/products/proxmox-virtual-environment/requirements

And obviously more storage and more RAM is better, especially if you plan to use zfs. Keep that in mind when selecting hardware.

[–] freddo@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago

Thanks, I will look into the provided link.

[–] sixty@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

4 running nodes for like 5 services? Seems exessive, no?

[–] Coleslaw4145@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What makes you think its 4 proxmox nodes?

To me it looks like 3 Debian VMs (2 of them running docker containers) and 1 TrueNAS VM running in a single Proxmox node.

[–] Magnum@infosec.pub 3 points 1 day ago

Running everything in a VM to run it in Docker is excessive as well. It is supposed to use bare metal containers.

[–] xSikes@feddit.online 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

TruNAS is a VM? I thought it preferred bare metal? I would think it would be side by side with proxmox? (Still learning and planning my setup.

[–] habitualTartare@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Absolutely no problem with it being virtualized as long as you have a pci storage controller and pass that through to trueNAS. HBA cards can be found that do this without raid or anything so you can use zfs in trueNAS.

[–] nagaram@startrek.website 1 points 2 days ago

I've got a virtualized set up to.

Its pretty unbothered being virtualized so long as the disks are passed through. In my set up, I have the SAS board passed through and its using that.

My reasoning is that I wanted a lot of disks space, but I couldn't get that without just a big case in general, so I use the extra space to store GPUs for AI and encoding stuff

[–] Decronym@lemmy.decronym.xyz 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I've seen in this thread:

Fewer Letters More Letters
HTTP Hypertext Transfer Protocol, the Web
IP Internet Protocol
NUC Next Unit of Computing brand of Intel small computers
Plex Brand of media server package
RAID Redundant Array of Independent Disks for mass storage
UDP User Datagram Protocol, for real-time communications

6 acronyms in this thread; the most compressed thread commented on today has 9 acronyms.

[Thread #270 for this comm, first seen 2nd May 2026, 08:00] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]