this post was submitted on 01 May 2026
319 points (96.8% liked)

Selfhosted

60409 readers
223 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

i love selfhosting :3

top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 36 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Why do you use two separate Debian VMs plus a truenas VM running nextcloud?

[–] Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Security is the first thing that comes to mind. Compartmentalization prevents or at least makes it considerably harder for compromised services to screw up all the others.

Another thing would be that it might be easier to manage backups and snapshots.

[–] jimerson@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

From my understanding, it's helpful that each VM will have its own IP so ports can be opened only on specific VMs, increasing overall security.

[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You should look into container technology. No reason to have this many operating systems wasting resources

[–] renegadespork@lemmy.jelliefrontier.net 14 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Nice stack! What's the crab logo? I don't recognize it.

Do you notice a massive increase in request latency (like 10x-50x) when using a CloudFlare tunnel vs connecting directly to your IP? I've experimented with it a few times, but it really negatively impacts QoS for me, especially with federated services (like Matrix) where there are lots of small requests.

[–] blinfabian@feddit.nl 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

the crab is Homarr and no, i haven't had any issues with cloudflare

Thanks! I haven’t tried that dashboard yet, I might give it a spin.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] blinfabian@feddit.nl 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

its a dashboard application, i just have my hosted apps there

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

But like, does it help you with anything specific. Or is it just nice to look at

[–] irmadlad@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Do you notice a massive increase in request latency (like 10x-50x) when using a CloudFlare tunnel

Have not noticed that at all. I don't run any federated services tho. Might be the difference, I don't know.

[–] renegadespork@lemmy.jelliefrontier.net 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah I’m thinking the request frequency was the issue rather than bandwidth.

[–] timwa@lemmy.snowgoons.ro 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

That seems unlikely; trust me, there are services running behind Cloudflare tunnels that are doing more requests per second than whatever you're hosting does in a year.

The only times I've had performance problems with Cloudflare tunnels it's been intermediate network kit that didn't like IPv6 or didn't like QUIC (or both). You can try disabling both in cloudflared to diagnose (at least, you used to be able to disable them/switch to HTTP/2+IPv4, it's been a very long time since I've needed to so I'm just assuming it's still an option.)

My ISP is stuck in the Stone Age and doesn’t support IPv6, so I’ll look into that.

[–] mpramann@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What is your reason for running two separate Debian docker hosts with under 5 containers in total? That seems like quite the overhead? And why did you choose to install Nextcloud on your TrueNAS server?

[–] RecallMadness@lemmy.nz 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Not OP. But i do the same.

I have multiple proxmox hosts, running multiple VMs, each running containers.

I do it so I can minimise disruption. Fixing a fault in immich doesn’t mean the house is without plex for a week.

[–] mpramann@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Running multiple Proxmox hosts in a cluster makes sense so you can swap VMs from one the other and have extra hardware reliability. I'd also get grouping your containers on different Docker VMs the apply the same security rules to containers in a group (internally vs. externally available for example). But how does a faulty Immich container take down a Plex container?

[–] RecallMadness@lemmy.nz 1 points 2 months ago

Could be anything.

Something decides it’s going to fill your disk up with noise and plex enters a crash loop as it can’t write to disk any more.

Your reverse proxy decides it’s not going to issue valid SSL certificates so all your plex clients refuse to connect.

One day an OS update decides your network configuration wasn’t important, and your OS throws a shit fit because there’s no route to 192.168.1.100 any more

[–] irmadlad@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

i love selfhosting :3

Me2! Nice solid stack you got going there bro.

[–] JetpackJackson@feddit.org 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] blinfabian@feddit.nl 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] madejackson@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Nice setup.

Though in terms of manageability it looks like a nightmare.

Cosmos Cloud You can thank me later ;) or azukaar for that matter.

And Cosmos OpenWrt for the ultimate all in one OS (my creation)

[–] freddo@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Is proxmox a viable option to be used on a NUC for example?

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yes, I run it on mine, with an N100 processor. Make sure it's a recent-ish one with the necessary virtualization extensions. https://www.proxmox.com/en/products/proxmox-virtual-environment/requirements

And obviously more storage and more RAM is better, especially if you plan to use zfs. Keep that in mind when selecting hardware.

[–] freddo@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago

Thanks, I will look into the provided link.

[–] amniote@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

" Why won't somebody think about the backups ? "

None of you come in my shop.

[–] Cyber@feddit.uk 2 points 2 months ago

Or the restores... 😉

[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] lando55@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago

🤦🏼‍♂️

[–] Bahnd@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago
[–] OR3X@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Mine is just Debian.

[–] xSikes@feddit.online 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

TruNAS is a VM? I thought it preferred bare metal? I would think it would be side by side with proxmox? (Still learning and planning my setup.

[–] habitualTartare@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Absolutely no problem with it being virtualized as long as you have a pci storage controller and pass that through to trueNAS. HBA cards can be found that do this without raid or anything so you can use zfs in trueNAS.

[–] nagaram@startrek.website 1 points 2 months ago

I've got a virtualized set up to.

Its pretty unbothered being virtualized so long as the disks are passed through. In my set up, I have the SAS board passed through and its using that.

My reasoning is that I wanted a lot of disks space, but I couldn't get that without just a big case in general, so I use the extra space to store GPUs for AI and encoding stuff

[–] Decronym@lemmy.decronym.xyz 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I've seen in this thread:

Fewer Letters More Letters
HTTP Hypertext Transfer Protocol, the Web
IP Internet Protocol
NUC Next Unit of Computing brand of Intel small computers
Plex Brand of media server package
RAID Redundant Array of Independent Disks for mass storage
SSH Secure Shell for remote terminal access
SSL Secure Sockets Layer, for transparent encryption
UDP User Datagram Protocol, for real-time communications

[Thread #270 for this comm, first seen 2nd May 2026, 08:00] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]

[–] sixty@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

4 running nodes for like 5 services? Seems exessive, no?

[–] Coleslaw4145@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What makes you think its 4 proxmox nodes?

To me it looks like 3 Debian VMs (2 of them running docker containers) and 1 TrueNAS VM running in a single Proxmox node.

[–] Magnum@infosec.pub 3 points 2 months ago

Running everything in a VM to run it in Docker is excessive as well. It is supposed to use bare metal containers.