this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2026
844 points (98.8% liked)

News

37421 readers
1851 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Democrats had all the leverage during the government shutdown and demanded nothing.

They had the presidency and did nothing.

But when they have no leverage they start introducing bills which they know will not pass.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Of course.

Can't do anything, but gotta look like you're doing something so they can use it for fodder in the next election

[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

This is just so some Democrats can claim "supported/worked for higher worker wages" during their next reelection campaign.

[–] Tolc@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Imagine begging for crumbs of your own labour from the bourgeosie imperialist democratic party

[–] 404found@lemmy.zip 23 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This is just for show and will end up going nowhere. If you think this has even a remote chance at changing the minimum wage then I have a bridge to sell you.

We live in a time where democrats do nothing but act appalled, corporations control politics, corporations keep getting bigger, consumer prices increase year after year, healthcare premiums constantly cost more and employee benefits keep getting more expensive every year. What gives you the idea corporations are going to let politicians triple minimum wage? If that happens it will have a ripple effect where higher paying job positions will want a raise because why should someone making an entry level wage be paid the same as a job position with a lot more responsibility?

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago

most of them are gop that are not electable as a republican, so they become DINOS. schumer +13 other senators are likely the same, likewise with the house seats.

[–] amgine@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Not just that but if it passed it would eat into profits. We can’t have that, think of the shareholders

[–] sunbytes@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Profits are already eaten up by executive bonuses and salaries.

It's regular salaries that eat into those, and that's what they're trying to protect.

[–] ViceroTempus@lemmy.world 37 points 2 days ago (12 children)

I'm far more interested in a wage cap. Top level earner can't earn more than 10x the lowest level earner in the company. And a it doesn't matter the amount the wage is, if it isn't also tied to inflation as we'll be back fighting this fight again in short order if it isn't. That of course is take all of this at face value, and pretending it's not just theater.

Though overall I would still prefer people rejecting the current business structures and making employee-owned businesses the new way. Go Pirate with the whole thing, everybody works for shares. Unions/Min. Wage are just compromises from realizing the true potential and pay of the working class.

[–] veni_vedi_veni@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

The real money is made on assets, not income

[–] Horsey@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I’m not an expert, but in that case, the company just splits into different sub-companies, no? The manufacturing arm would have a CEO paid in stocks and lower level workers still make nothing.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] E_coli42@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just do it on a per-State level. That way blue states can push their minimum wage up without having to worry about pandering to red states. There is a reason we are a federation if States.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I feel like some degree of mandatory minimum requirements established at the federal level that's adjusted and implemented per state would be the best case scenario. Obviously minimum wage in California or Texas simply shouldn't be the same as in Ohio or Wyoming. It really should be more reflective of cost of living of the specific location.

But also, if you leave it completely up to the states with no mandates from the federal level, enjoy seeing $7.25/hr indefinitely in places like Texas.

[–] bigfish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 185 points 3 days ago (17 children)

And pin it to an inflation index maybe?

[–] TheMadCodger@piefed.social 140 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Pin it to congressional compensation.

Pin it to the sum of all campaign contributions and congretional "gifts".

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 42 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They pinned it to median income.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

Introduce a bill for Socialized Healthcare too!!!

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 117 points 3 days ago (17 children)

They can't pass it. They don't have majority. Now watch as they win midterms and this gets forgotten completely.

I mean, why not introduce this bill during any of the 4 years Biden was in office? Because it would've been actual policy, and they don't want that. This is political virtue signaling and nothing more.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 34 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Now watch as they win midterms and this gets forgotten completely.

"We can't pass it. We don't have supermajority."

They get supermajority.

"We can't pass it. We don't have the presidency"

They win presidential elections.

"We can't just pass it. It has to be bipartisan or it's bad for democracy"

They lose midterms.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Democrats pretend to want to do the right thing when they're not in power.

When they're in power, we get more than enough no votes to sink it and tonedeaf celebration of the girlboss energy of Sinema's thumbs down.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (4 children)

This is one of those ask for 100 so you can negotiate down to 50 kind of things isn't it? Or just a pretend attempt to look good when it's obviously rejected.

[–] Wakmrow@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

It's a pretend attempt lol

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BigMacHole@thelemmy.club 59 points 3 days ago (2 children)

How DARE they Show voters what to Expect if PROGRESSIVES win a Majority!

-People who will DISAPPEAR after the Midterms!

[–] cogman@lemmy.world 36 points 3 days ago (5 children)

It's a great move and these are bills that need to be introduced frequently by dems right now. When people say "Yeah, but what can they do". This. This is what they can do. Introducing these messaging bills for republicans to vote again and then grand standing on how republicans won't do anything to help the working class.

But dems must follow through. Minimum wage is the prefect example of where they should follow through. Attach it to a budget bill and when the parliamentarian says "not allowed" tell them to F off and push it through anyways. Just as the republicans have already done several times since they took control. Or blow up the filibuster. Either is an acceptable act for when dems get power. But they must deliver.

If dems operate like they did in Biden term 1 or Obama term 1, they'll be sunk in 2032.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CanIFishHere@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago

How can anyone survive on ~$7.80/hr? That is modern day indentured slavery.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It should be at least $20/hr

[–] Fridgeratr@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The bill is for $25. No way it'll actually happen tho even though we desperately need it

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago

How stupid do they think we are? Oh wait, I regularly talk to people who fall for these stunts

[–] MrShankles@reddthat.com 21 points 2 days ago (13 children)

Thanks I guess? Maybe try stopping the fascist movement first... we can talk about empty promises later, but I ain't seen y'all push back worth a fuck. Sure as shit, I don't believe that weak sentiment if ya can't even oust a certified pedo

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 10 points 2 days ago

These same commenters will make fun of reddit and twitter for always being cynical and rage fueled.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago (2 children)

We need a revolution to undo the damage of this administration. Democrats aren’t going to do shit and they’re all owned by the AIPAC Uniparty. This administration has been devastating to our future. Heads need to roll and I haven’t heard any democrats running on real accountability and a hard line against Israel

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›