Oh whew, the picture only shoes the Atlantic Ocean. I’m safe then.
this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2026
333 points (98.5% liked)
World News
55698 readers
2696 users here now
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I'd say that giving Trump nuclear launch codes is just as scary.
Compulsory "If you've been paying attention we have known about this and every other catastrophic event since at least the 1970's. We aren't listening to the right people."
Millions if not billions of people are going to be severely at risk and even die. The vast majority of these people will be brown or black. The majority of these people will be children.
We as a species should be ashamed putting the well being of a small few over the majority.
The optimism is we will science our way out of this. Humanity is like a monkeys paw.
So I guess what I'm saying is on the individual level everyone open their eyes don't be a dick and leave the world better than you came into it. Beyond that, sit back and enjoy the show no one really knows what they're doing but the majority of us are doing our best.
No government is going to do anything about something happening after the year 2100.
Exactly! If it doesn’t benefit them publicly before the next election, no government will act.
If I'm not mistaken, the movie posited that the temperature collapse is happening faster than we think and accelerated to collapse all at the same time.
The estimate is 2100 but that's just an estimate. Reality is that it could happen at any time.
There's nothing scientifically inaccurate about that part IMO. There's positive feedback loops hiding everywhere. The bad things come in bursts. For example, melting ice releases trapped methane, causing higher temperatures and more melting ice. Who knows how fast this goes
At the time of the film's release, it offered a new theory about what could happen to Earth's climate in the future. Sure many scientist just laughed to this scenario. The funny thing is that AMOC research started in the same year. All we have is data from 2004 to the present, of course that is not enough to draw conclusions about our future climate.
Earth's climate is complex, studying AMOC alone is not enough. And one of the biggest problem is that there are other MOCs, not just AMOC, any changes to AMOC will impact other MOCs. And there is a new research called the SAMOC Initiative started 5 yr ago.
I remember The Day After Tomorrow, it was an okay film but it solidified in me the fear of climate change. The movie may not be scientifically accurate, mainly because they got the temperatures backwards. In the movie, the world froze starting at the poles. IRL, it's going to boil and burn starting from the equator.
The most frightening climate movie is still "Don't look up"
Iirc that's already started. All the growing zones have moved further north or south from where they used to be when I was a kid (back in the early 60's).
Oh yeah I've seen it myself. I'd like to move up north to get ahead of it, but there's national lines to get across and taking my pets would be difficult at best.
I've also been noticing that since I was a kid (90s/00s), back then there was a white winter every singe year in my area. Now we're lucky if we get any snow at all during winter.
Then I'll hear some rube say that 'global warming isn't real,' like what bitch?! Have you not been paying attention?!
While that is true. If the Atlantic ocean current stops, the poles will freeze, and start a new ice age in northern Europe and North America, while also boiling the equator.
Except the warming oceans prevent that.
The oceans won't be warming equally everywhere if there isn't a proper current to tranport the heat around. The oceans will warm a lot by the equator, and freeze around the poles.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Sorry, but why would we not use the name AMOC and instead call it the "22 year old movie current"?
... It needs to have a title that Americans might actually read.
You know, half a football field, approximately 8 hamburgers, instead of actual measurements?
We're on average 5th graders, as far as reading ability goes.
Last I saw it was 3rd grade. I would be hyped if it's still at 5th
Down to 3rd grade?
The zombie apocalypse is progressing that rapidly?
For the clicks.
'Scientist warn that environmental acronym is fucked' is a headline everyone has learned to tune out.
But if maybe Jake Gyllenhaal can save us.. I mean, now you want to know more, right?
I was really more thinking "Wait...what happened in that movie? Shit, when did I even watch that movie? Like 2007?"
The movie was based loosely on a 'non-fiction' book written by radio host and conspiracy theorist Art Bell.
So basically, that's where we are currently with the state of discourse involving environmental science. We are being warned about something of massive significance and dire consequence by way of a reference to a 20 year old Roland Emmerich movie based on a book written by a loonie...
I'm not real hopeful for our chances as a species..
Oh don't worry, I know all about Art Bell and his book 'The Coming Global Superstorm.'
Still waiting on that "Quickening" he was talking about all those years ago.
What about "Aging Movie is Ominously Current" or AMOC for short?
Another Menacing Ocean Con?
Golf claps
Well done, old chap!
Probably because most people wouldn't know what that acronym stood for.
Sure, but "Atlantic" and/or "Ocean" were right there.
So I guess we've just completely given up on how to use acronyms and abbreviations. I've noticed that a increasing amount of people will just use them without explaining it, they just expect others will either already know what it means or will do a search and figure it out. As a non-native English speaker it drives me up the wall. I find my self asking what a acronym/abbreviation means at least once per week, sometimes multiple times a week.
I thought that explaining the acronym on the first use, and then using it as is was the common and courteous way to use them, WTF (what the fuck) happened to that, I do wonder.
As a native English speaker, I concur with your feelings on the matter. I absolutely hate when someone does that and sometimes I won't even bother to finish reading what someone wrote if they just start using acronyms all willy nilly. Hell, you can't even point out spelling errors or grammar errors anymore without upsetting someone.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Remember to duck when the helicopters come tumbling down.
In 2100. That’s more than enough time to reboot Friends at least twice. I’m not worried.
It was shitty the first fucking time. We don't need to make that crap again.
It will be better this time. There will be a gay Friend, a lesbian friend, a black friend and an Asian Friend. Maybe make the Lesbian a Hispanic, too, and kill two Friends with one stone.
Just spitballing but... Maybe we could kill all of them with a stone?
load more comments
(2 replies)
view more: next ›