this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2026
484 points (98.8% liked)

Climate

8570 readers
841 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BygoneNeutrino@lemmy.world 1 points 44 minutes ago

...Jesus. The bots are overwhelming this post.

Weird that it just has two photos of Ted Cruz side by side

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 7 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

"Forever" is not possible, a future Congress can just repeal the law.

[–] RamenJunkie@midwest.social 5 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

But what if they add a "No Takesy Backsey" clause?

[–] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 4 points 3 hours ago

They takesy backsey the clause first

[–] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 11 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

I'll be honest, I don't really care. None of these laws mean anything if the government is completely rebuilt from the ground up. Every single thing this admin does will be worth so much burned toilet paper. All the grifts ill gotten gains will be liquidated and confiscated by whoever the fuck hangs them all in the streets, as is most likely to happen. All the bills that say shit like "no regulations on AI evar!! Lol" or "Donald Trumps name on everything, including mt Kilimanjaro for some reason" will be meaningless.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

The only way this will happen is through violence, and even then it's not a guarantee.

  • conservative South loss against the north in the civil war and there were no reparations or punishment.
  • Nixon came the closest to being impeached and charges were dropped as soon as he resigned, despite the fact that the votes were there. We was then fucking pardoned because "we need to move on."
  • fucking TRUMP will "learn his lesson" for forcing Ukraine to provide opposition research on Biden in exchange for security.
  • TRUMP again when he literally caused people to storm the capitol.
  • when Biden was in office, house refused to even push more impeachment talks because "he's not president anymore" and then got Pikachu faced when he ran again.
  • when Trump finally was found guilty in New York, the judge fucking gave him no jail time.

Democrats refuse to hold Republicans accountable and we need to start acting like they are part of the problem.

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 11 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (2 children)

democrats are just potty trained republicans, it seems to me. as an outsider america seems to have just one party that is divided.

[–] foxymochakitten@slrpnk.net 1 points 22 minutes ago

American here. Can confirm. It's not left vs right, it really is just two different colors.

[–] 0tan0d@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Watching all blue states fail in lock step to substantially improve the lives of the people that live in them has me thinking you are on to something.

[–] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Your first sentence is about the gist of it. No way out of it now.

[–] 4grams@awful.systems 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (9 children)

I'll be honest, I don't really care.

This is how they win, you are doing precisely what they want.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 hours ago

This matters for ... the next 10 years? 20? Gas will not get much cheaper again, while renewables will, and battery tech only gets better.

[–] CouncilOfFriends@slrpnk.net 2 points 6 hours ago
[–] ZpbkPEcaHhIveqdR@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

You sound as if you think the democrats are a progressive party

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Unlike the Republicans, they don't completely exclude progressives.

[–] DisgruntledGorillaGang@reddthat.com 1 points 58 minutes ago

They just mostly exclude progressives.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 8 points 9 hours ago

aside from like only 2 dems in congress, almost every other one is complicit.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 7 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

They framed it as a way to “protect American energy from leftist legal crusades punishing lawful activity.”

Aren't lawful actions already protected by, you know, the law? By definition, the only legal punishments that could happen are for illegal actions. This doesn't even make the slightest bit of sense as reasoning. They didn't even try to manufacture justification.

Anyway, when the justice system no longer can be relied on to provide justice, extra-legal methods must be taken to ensure a just society. Them doing this could be either of two things, or both. It's them actually protecting dirty energy companies, as it sounds, or it's them requiring vigilantism to stop it, which gives them justification to crack down on "the left" and anyone else who stands against them.

Edit: Also, they consistently say that climate change isn't real, and yet they feel the need to pass a law that explicitly is there to protect against the harms of climate change. Either it's real, and they should pay (especially since they knew about it and mislead the public, which this also explicitly protects), or it isn't real, and this law is pointless.

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 6 points 9 hours ago

the actual way to solve “leftist legal crusades” (if they exist): anti-SLAPP laws that punish frivolous lawsuits… but that would hurt them more than “leftists”

[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world -1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Shouldn't democrats sort out epstein files when Biden administration was in power?

[–] Stormy@thelemmy.club 4 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Oh you mean while the files were conveniently sealed by court order because of Maxwells case until exactly when trump came into office?

What did you want them to do at that time?

[–] RamenJunkie@midwest.social 3 points 4 hours ago

Do it anyway.

The MAGA Nazis don't care about rules or laws and taking down a global ring of child predators that has existed for decades feels like an excusable reason.

[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

What did you want them to do at that time?

Expose trump

[–] Stormy@thelemmy.club 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

While the documented proof that apparently everyone needs to see was conveniently locked and sealed by the doj?

Do you know what trump would have said if they went above that?

"They're weaponizing the DOJ, it's a witch hunt and fake news. It's all lies they're doing this to hurt me." Invigorating the low information base he has to what, fucking go riot and try to hurt the people in dc again. March on the capital and shit, again?

[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

He was screaming at the time that epstein files must be released. If they were his presidency chances would be buried forever

load more comments
view more: next ›