Yeah, no. I'd much rather have all the MAGA deported. It would really make this country 10 times better overnight. Much less murder and crime instantly.
this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2026
399 points (98.3% liked)
politics
29459 readers
2175 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
If it applies to Islamic fundamentalists, does it also apply to Christian nationalists?
How about we get a bill that bans conservatives from the US?
IT'S GUILLOTINE AND JUSTICE TIME!
GUILLOTINE AND JUSTICE TIME!
GUILLOTINE AND JUSTICE WITH A BASEBALL BAT!
This is the best, thanks
Does this encroach on first amendment or can they just ban whoever they don't like under the guise of national security?
It does encroach, but they'll still go for the ban.
It's my understanding that the first amendment (and presumably others) doesn't apply to non-citizens who are outside the US.
No, it doesn't. The US currently bans all communists from applying to be citizens or have long term visas. That has been held as constitutional for pretty much 80 years.
Since the US allowed that discrimination in place without any popular uprising, this new restriction would entirely be allowed and encouraged by the American public.
well considering they already asked me these questions when I applied for my residency and my green card and will again if I become a citizen I doubt it
It turns out McCarthyism 2.0 is going to be even worse.
“cynically used to disadvantage American workers' competitiveness in favor of mass-importing the third world.” Seems to me Socialists aren’t the ones who have been exporting American jobs to “third world countries”… seems like more of a Republican, Billionaire Epstein class kind of thing. Perhaps we need to review who really needs to be denaturalized and deported.
Perhaps we need to review who really needs to be denaturalized and deported.
"If only, if only," the woodpecker sighs . . ..
First amendment is very clear you cannot make any law that would limit speech
Sort of.
SCOTUS generally allows for time, place, and manner restrictions so long as there is reasonable alternatives provided. So, governments can restrict speech with noise ordinances at a reasonable hour (can't be blaring an anti-war protest at 2:30 a.m. in a residential neighborhood or can't block fire exits with a crowd of protesters) if the person(s) protesting is/are given a viable alternative. Also, child porn doesn't enjoy the same First Amendment protections as regular pornographic materials.
But, other than that, you're generally correct.
Can we ban fascists, theists, and other right wing boot-lickers from the US? We seem to have an infestation.
Who wants to dig McCarthy up, stick him up on a cross and prop him up in this guy's front yard?
or other totalitarian party This may backfire on you, folks.
The GOP is full of idiots
EVIL idiots
Evil idiots with POWER.
Power the evil people handed to them.
Mamdani is a centrist, he isn't left. But since the Republicans are alt right and the Democrats are right, they consider everything else to be far left and label anything that isn't right as communist. They don't know what communism is. Even Trump labeled people communist nazis. Communists and nazis are the opposite of eachother. Americans are so, so fucking dumb.
He might not be as left as you'd like, but calling Mamdani a centrist is just ignorant
Par the course for anarchists.
They would kill Jesus himself
Donald Trump IS Jesus, obviously
What did they think the J stood for, Jessica?
Pretty sure Donald Trump is the antichrist
Just a doctor.
load more comments
(1 replies)
view more: next ›