this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2026
545 points (98.9% liked)

politics

29444 readers
1530 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Right, its the Progressives at the "Unite the Right" ralley, that chant "Jews will not replace us" here, and who waive Nazi flags.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Funny thing is, in Weimar politics it was the centrists joining with the far right fascist conservatives against progressives who effed their way into electing an infirm, dementia ridden, incompetent Von Hindenberg, who then appointed Hitler chancellor. Elevating the fascists to power.

The centrists always allow the conservatives to eff the world, every time, and its always because they are afraid of progressives getting power and doing something good for the filthy damned peasants.

I suppose from a very twisted, "look what you made me do" perspective, you could blame progressives, but its abuser logic.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 7 points 15 hours ago

Remember that stupid book just about every conservative bonehead was telling everyone to read? Liberal Fascism?

I wonder if this dumbfuck read that stupid book, too.

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 7 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Into the trash heap of history with ye

[–] teslekova@sh.itjust.works 19 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

So Clarence, what exactly did you not like about Hitler? You seem to be on the same page on most things.

[–] TransNeko@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

He didn't like that Hitler looks better than him. which isn't saying much since they are both hideous inside and out.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 35 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That guy will say anything for more RV money.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

Theres something extra sad about that. If you are going to stoop to corruption and payola at that level of government, at least have the self respect to get paid better for it.

[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

I really wish he took it.

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm honestly not super clear on what "progressivism" means for him, but even so it's pretty bad.

The speech is ostensibly bemoaning the progressive movement of the early 20th century, but the New Republic’s Matt Ford has a fantastic piece about how his history is completely wrong. Thomas claims that the American progressive movement was founded by Wilson and imported from Germany, neither of which is true. It was a reaction to corporate abuses and corrupt governance and horrific things like child labor and environmental destruction. It was an organic, grassroots movement, but Thomas says it was a top-down push to suppress individual liberties and put the government in charge of everything. That is a false, libertarian counterhistory that has no basis in reality. The justice also asserts that progressivism led to the worst atrocities of the 20th century, including Nazi Germany, Stalinism, and Mao, and draws a straight line from that to progressivism today.

I think I've been listening too much to a certain type of podcast recently. I distinctly remember hearing about Thomas' early years and how he was a bastard basically from the start, but no detail.

I think he was elated that he was allowed to join the club of rich white assholes and once that happened, there was no more discrimination in the US, systemic or otherwise 🪄

[–] Draegur@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 day ago

His definition of progressivism is "anyone who disagrees with me and wants me to face consequences for my corruption."

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 134 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

"We're hateful because you want us to not be." is such a dumb, lazy retort. It's not even an argument, just childish "Nu uh, you are" echoing of criticism. It somehow makes their bigotry worse than if they would actually put some effort into defending it.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The GOP when an innocent person gets gunned down on some lunatic's driveway in claimed "self-defense": "But muh rights. The only way to stop bad guys with guns is good guys with guns. The homeowners are innocent victims."

The GOP when their hatred is met with self-defensive hatred: "Um, actually, self-proclaimed 'good guys' using hatred to tell 'bad guys' who target their hatred at 'innocent victims' to stop being hateful is woke moralism. But also we're obviously the good guys here anyway since we aren't woke moralists. And we're telling you to stop your hatred of innocent conservative victims and uhhhhhh... Fuck you, libcucks!"

[–] WesternInfidels@feddit.online 85 points 1 day ago

"Look what you made me do" is an abuser's refrain.

[–] Corporal_Punishment@feddit.uk 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Progressive thinking led to him becoming a judge and to this mess.

Maybe he's onto something.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
[–] MrRandom@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Couldn't find it with a blue arrow on Google, so I stole the old one where Reddit's upvotes were orange

[–] Mantzy81@aussie.zone 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] athatet@lemmy.zip 46 points 1 day ago
[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 54 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The justice also bemoaned the “unfair criticism and attacks” that he and other tellers of truths must withstand as the price for courageously “not budging” on their principles.

I guess if you can't defend yourself for obvious corruption you misrepresent their argument and act like the victim. Judges sure love punishing folks in criminal court who act that way, I guess no criticism is left for the top corrupt judges who do it.

[–] Carmakazi@piefed.social 36 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It's like a core belief of conservatism. Being criticized for being evil is somehow a worse fate than being a victim of evil. Because:

  1. They lack empathy and can only understand the problems they themselves experience.
  2. They're soft as baby shit, so they whine about the most minor setbacks.
[–] Rivermoonwolf@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They not only lack empathy, they fucking despise it. They seriously view it as a sin, which tells me all I need to know about their god.

[–] MrRandom@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 hours ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"mostly just sad"? We are way past the point of "I'm not angry, I'm disappointed" with these people. Call it what it was - a disgusting, dangerous escalation on the road to jailing political opponents.

[–] youcantreadthis@quokk.au 3 points 1 day ago

Nobodys gonna kick the scum out of office, though.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Reminder that Clarence hates liberalism and thinks it ruined his life. Best I can think is that he's annoyed that people think he was hired under affirmative action.

[–] BlueHarvest@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

which is really weird because without liberals, he never would have been able to marry his wife. given his wifes looks, I'm not saying that's necessarily a good thing, but do we really think conservatives would have repealed the miscegenation laws?

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Or get his job. Or his education. Or vote. Or....

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"The only acceptable affirmative actions are affirmative actions that benefit me."

[–] borkborkbork@piefed.social 7 points 1 day ago

very typical conservative behavior - pull the ladder up behind you and castigate the people you harm for daring to want the same

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Surely they won't come after my rights. - Conservatives and conservative voters.

[–] M137@lemmy.today 1 points 15 hours ago

A reoccurring thing is them experiencing just that, be it rights or whatever else, but so many don't change their views even then. Seen so many posts here for new articles where some persons wife, other family etc. got deported or beaten because they're anything other than chalk white and the partner just goes "it sucks that this happened but I won't change my views and don't regret my voting choices".

load more comments (1 replies)

This dude has been compromised for decades now.

[–] Whitebrow@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This some Clayton Bigsby level bullshit.

[–] nothingcorporate@lemmy.today 1 points 21 hours ago

From a member of the Supreme Court. SMDH.

[–] tacoplease@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

If Clarence Thomas was made a freeman in the 1800's, he would have become a slave owner.

[–] Velypso@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Hey so why is nobody asking for the whole article.

I can only assume that very few people in this thread actually clicked the fucking link.

Fuck.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

I don't have any problem reading it?

[–] PDFuego@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I have links set to open in a private firefox tab, then reader mode or whatever it's called generally avoids all of the popups, paywalls & spaces where ads would be without ad blockers while letting you read the whole thing.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe 16 points 1 day ago

I’m glad these lunatics have gone fully mask-off. We can see how fucking stupid they are.

[–] kalkulat@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Good to see people are learning that when they finally elect the stupid, they finally learn what was -really- going through those stupid heads for all those years. What they get is marinated in stupid... proud stupid ... EPIC stupid. (Compated to today's crowd, Reagan was a genius.)

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is why good education is paramount. Not that it prevents evil, but that is more easily identifiable.

[–] Rivermoonwolf@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why do you think they hate education so much...?

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 2 points 1 day ago

People who prefer to be told what to think of follow the popular narrative are easier to ~~control~~ guide.

[–] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 7 points 1 day ago

Well, go back to being a slave then, since you seem to hate progressivism so much. We’ll see how you like it then.

[–] webp@mander.xyz 5 points 1 day ago

I would so fucking hate to be stuck with this guy's psychology.

[–] cheat700000007@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Wait what did he say? All I hear is fart noises

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Can he choke on his spit in his sleep and go to hell already? Oh wait, I actually want him to live for at least two more years. He can die a miserable death in 2028.

[–] Ioughttamow@fedia.io 8 points 1 day ago

Well you see the nazis were national socialists 🤓

load more comments
view more: next ›