Pushing them as boogiemen has always been a self-owning take. Maybe they are adversaries but acting as reactionary as we do is counter productive, and they arent stupid people-- they capitalize on our stupidity. They are a great power and a great civilization, and we treat them like they are some third world tinpot tyrants. All that said, there are clearly differences between them and the west that needs respectful discussion that we arent bothering to engage in. If we are going to exercise influence in that area but also globally-- instead of paddling around there like arrogant hick dipshits lets get on with it and be serious about it.
this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2026
85 points (94.7% liked)
World News
55553 readers
2072 users here now
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Well yes, China does seem like the adult in the room compared to their own leadership so not at all surprising.
Its the comparison between frighteningly repressive but productive, and outright destructively, counterproductively sociopathic.
Neither are good, but one isn't actively destroying the world, fucking literally everyone over, and complicit in a genocide and unjust war that seems for all the world to be carried out to protect several pedos.
Hopefully this whole shitshow will push people into renewables so hard that there's no turning back.
As an American, I'm pleased with China's:
- Renewable energy adoption
- Electric vehicle progress
- Battery technology advancement
- Their willingness to subsidize shipping and other supply chain stuff so that I can order cheap parts and PCBs (Chinese citizens are paying for that in their taxes... Thanks!)
I'm disappointed and even appalled with China's:
- Treatment of their own citizens (especially Uyghurs, people in Tibet)
- Endless bullshit regarding Taiwan (just leave them alone already!)
- Social credit system
- Installing secret back doors in electronic products
- Helping North Korea
- What they did in Hong Kong
- Allowing the same people to remain in charge for so long (that's never a good idea)
- Lack of regulations (or enforcement) that protect their own people. Move to the 8 hour work day already! They need the equivalent of OSHA that actually does their job.
- Completely untrustworthy government when it comes to negotiating in good faith
The last two are the reasons why no one trusts China or many entire product categories if they originate in China. Example: Who TF is going to buy Chinese baby formula‽
In the US we have a saying, "cheap Chinese junk." It's often said after some cheap Chinese product fails, often spectacularly (e.g. emits smoke or catches fire). There's so many examples of this in my own life it's kind of unreal:
- Power supplies that have no moving parts yet fail completely within a year
- Plastic stuff that just breaks for no good reason (presumably because they didn't add a UV stabilizer to the raw plastic? Just wild speculation on my part)
- Anything with metal parts will rust or degrade so fast you wonder how it even made it to America without self destructing.
I can go on and on about the poor quality of tons of Chinese-made products but you get the idea. Having said that, there's plenty of great Chinese brands that make quality stuff. It's just that there's so much more cheap/generic stuff from China that competes with the good stuff it gets drowned out.
If I were in charge over there, the first thing I'd do is start real inspections of consumer goods. I mean, it shouldn't even be possible for a company to ship a children's product with lead in it! Mandatory inspections! Of everything. Also, if any of your inspectors are offered a bribe, give them a great big bonus for reporting it and make the person who tried to bribe them suffer. China ultimately executed the folks responsible for the baby formula thing... More of that! Show the world you're serious about reliability and safety.
I'd go even further and hire foreigners to inspect Chinese products, right there in China. Give them the authority to shut down assembly lines when products start showing signs of contamination. Be as open and transparent as possible!
Of course, the social credit system needs to go. Government should not be rating their people. That's just evil. Let the market do it with background checks and credit scores 🤣
(I admit that's not great either, but it's infinitely better than having the government do it)
From personal experience, the population numbers are crazy. You have extreme good and extreme bad. And since most things steer toward the older population, the stupid traditions like second hand smoke literally everywhere are slowly slowly going away. I give China 10 more years until anyone could happily last a week.
My critique of China’s environmental policies will always be that it’s rooted in lessening the impact on the environment for human reasons first, never for the sake of the environment and the other life we share this planet with. It’s also one of my fundamental criticisms of ML theory itself; it still puts humans first. I get that we’re going to tend to default to that, but the amount of Western “leftists” willing to ignore the rape of the planet for human’s sake just to spite western methods disgusts me. Strip-mining for rare earth elements to make better batteries for solar power isn’t exactly a better trade off than burning coal, it just makes you feel better cus it sounds better. And let’s talk about the factory farms it takes to feed a billion people who’ve been moved out of subsistence farming and into a “middle class”.
I can go on and on about the poor quality of tons of Chinese-made products but you get the idea. Having said that, there’s plenty of great Chinese brands that make quality stuff. It’s just that there’s so much more cheap/generic stuff from China that competes with the good stuff it gets drowned out.
What you are experiencing is a different cultural approach that the west frequently fails to get what they expect. There's a concept of "if you ask for bottom dollar prices, you're going to bottom tier products". Paraphrasing even further put another way "why are you complaining about getting junk when you're only willing to pay junk prices?". Get acquainted with the Chinese phrase "chàbuduō" (差不多). It literally translates to "a little bit less than all", but figuratively translates to "close enough". This is a very common phrase and idea in Chinese culture. If you're buying the cheapest version of something you're going to get a product that is likely not up to spec, but "close enough". The second phrase you should know is "méi bàn fǎ" (没办法). This one figuatively translates to: "nothing can be done" or "it can't be helped". When you point out something isn't up to what you expect, you should be ready to hear this phrase and understand that the person or company you're dealing with isn't interested in changing the situation and are simply washing their hands of the issue leaving you with it.
Neither of these are failings of Chinese culture, its just different. The failing would be expecting all other cultures to behave like our own.
If you don't want the bad product, buy the more expensive version. As you said, you can absolutely get very high quality products from China, but you're not getting those for a tiny fraction of the price of high quality goods from other sources.
In most Western countries, all products have a basic warranty, required by law. Meaning: If that shit breaks real fast, you can return it and get your money back.
The issue with cheap Chinese goods is that returning them is unrealistic. The subsidized shipping only works one way. It's often the case that it costs more to ship the product back than the product costs in the first place.
Because of the mandatory warrantees, western consumers have a bare minimum expectation of the quality of any given product. Most Chinese-made products fail to meet that expectation. Hence, the reputation that Chinese products are crap.
You can't hand wave this problem away, saying you get what you pay for (also a common saying in the West). It's systemic. Also, I've taken risks buying more expensive versions of the same products and had the exact same result.
Meaning: Almost all of the time, you don't get what you pay for when you buy Chinese products. Rather, if you pay any more than the bare minimum, you're wasting your money.
This isn't a good situation for China or Western consumers! China doesn't like the reputation they've built and the West just wants decent stuff that meet basic standards of quality (and safety!).
Let me make something clear: There is no situation where paying very little should result in receiving a dangerous product. You cannot point to a power supply that caught fire and say, "should've paid more!" You cannot look at a plastic toy that leaches lead into the skin (and children's mouths) and say, "should've spent more money!"
In the West, companies that made such things would be held liable and probably go out of business very quickly. Their executives would be in the news and probably be testifying before angry Congressmen with even angrier constituents in the audience.
For some reason, Chinese manufacturers not only continue to make total crap—some of which is dangerous—they thrive on making such crap. No one seems to care in China. It's like you say, making money is all that matters. It is so obviously the general belief in China that it is the consumer's fault when products fail. You said so yourself!
So I ask you this: Was it the parents fault for feeding their babies contaminated baby formula? Should the people who installed toxic drywall have known better? Did the people who died from contaminated blood thinner deserve it for being poor consumers?
Perhaps the parents who bought Chinese made toys heavily contaminated with lead should've bought the expensive scanners and tested all the toys before giving them to their children? Or performed ASTM testing themselves to ensure the magnets inside various toys wouldn't fall out and choke and kill their children?
Let me tell you something: Toys made in West go through such testing. It was a lesson learned in blood over decades.
For some reason, China has yet to learn the lessons. Or perhaps it's Chinese culture just to not care and blame the victims?
You can’t hand wave this problem away, saying you get what you pay for (also a common saying in the West). It’s systemic. Also, I’ve taken risks buying more expensive versions of the same products and had the exact same result.
...and...
So I ask you this: Was it the parents fault for feeding their babies contaminated baby formula? Should the people who installed toxic drywall have known better? Did the people who died from contaminated blood thinner deserve it for being poor consumers?
There's another element of Chinese culture you're missing and it is that of "miànzi" (面子) or "face" as in our version of the phrase "saving face", or figuratively "reputation". The sellers do care about their reputation, but there are different groups they care about and groups they may not. You're likely a western end user retail customer. Most probably don't care about you. They might care about their reputation with their western reseller customers though.
The examples of poison drywall or adulterated formula are very bad by both Chinese and Western standards, but for slightly different reasons. The western view it as bad because it harmed the end consumers. The Chinese view would be a loss of face of the seller for being such a public and shameless scam without integrity or honor, a huge loss of face.
No one seems to care in China. It’s like you say, making money is all that matters.
You're close to understanding, but you're still missing it. Again, you're judging this by western standards. Now, I'm western, and I like the western standards, but I also understand that their culture doesn't have to conform to ours for it to be "right". There is no objectively right way to do this. We're all different humans figuring different systems. I certainly have my preference for the western style, but that doesn't make what the Chinese have been doing for hundreds (3000 thousand, if you ask the Chinese) of years they've been doing less "right".
Let me tell you something: Toys made in West go through such testing. It was a lesson learned in blood over decades.
That's a very recent addition to western culture. Lots of toys even during my lifetime were dangerous. Two generations back, in the USA we had toys like this which heated up to 260 °C (500 °F):
Which caused serious burns and even some deaths for the children playing with them.
In the 1950s this was a toy:
You're bringing your perspective of individualism which is very much a Western idea. Other cultures don't come from that perspective and arrive and different conclusions. I can tell you, we'll see more of this press up on our western culture as trump continues to flounder our dominance and China continues to rise.
Why are you bothered by China helping North Korea? Also same people being in power isnt inherently wrong until institutions work properly, which seems to be the case in China.
And market and credit card rating people is good but govt doing is bad? lol
The only part that I agree with is the same people in power point, although I think it is poorly phrased. I would restate it as "a country ruled by the same people for a long time tends to have drastic swings in quality of life when it becomes time for succession, or when those people loose their mental faculties". This is not to say that I expect it to happen every time, but I am drawn to the dictators of the 1900s as examples since I am struggling to come up with one that survived to their third leader.
Can you say CPC is run by same people? they have clear succession method and they function according to whatever their party constitution says. Wasnt Xi himself held many small posts then rose to top? I wont call them dictator for the same reason, the President doesnt hold supreme power either
I will admit that I am not overly familiar with Chinese politics, but I would say that the current CCP does seem to be run rather well. If you could point me in the direction of information on the succession process that would be appreciated.
I wont call them dictator for the same reason, the President doesnt hold supreme power either
You have landed on the only systemic issue that I have with Chinese internal politics, I do not doubt that the president doesn't hold supreme power, but the party does since opposition parties are banned. This in my mind would mean that the actual most powerful position to hold is that of chairman of the CCP, this means that irregardless of how the nation is governed, effectively it is entirely run by a small group of autocrats. The Chinese system seems to be very similar to the constitutional monarchies of the early modern period with the biggest difference being that the ruling class is not necessarily hereditary. All this is to say that I think the system is great so long as you hold similar ideals, I do not, which is why I personally don't like it, but I cannot deny that it works.
This graph shows something interesting. The numbers held steady for a long time. Then the opinion started rapidly shifting during Trump's first presidency as they ramped up anti-CHAYNA! propaganda. That continied under Biden and the opinion trend followed. But look what happens after 2023. Despite the anti-China propaganda taps being fully open, the opinion trend goes positive. To me this means the propaganda is stopping to work for increasing number of people.
Anecdotally I see this with people I talk to in RL (in Canada). People who used to be on the China-bad (like myself) train have gotten off it and see their previous opinions as shaped by propaganda. Far from universal but things are shifting.
To me this means the propaganda is stopping to work for increasing number of people.
I have different reading of the data. Essentially there are two superpowers today: USA and China. No one wants to be ruled by another country, but the dominant superpower has that power to shape policy around the world through military and economic actions.
What I'm seeing is that trump made the USA so unpalatable with his actions that China becomes the lesser of two evils. So its not so much that China's bad behavior are erased, but given the choice of China or the USA leading the world, the world is rejecting the USA.
The world - for sure, but these are numbers for Americans.
I'm American but sane enough to see that's true.
I'm also apply the same logic to Americans. If a USA of the future is the trumpian-style, I'd rather have a strong China to act as a check on US power. We, the USA, are a negative force on the world right now under trump.
Anecdotally I see this with people I talk to in RL (in Canada). People who used to be on the China-bad (like myself) train have gotten off it and see their previous opinions as shaped by propaganda.
It's just that the bar for responsible government has become really low these days.
Exactly. And you see those guys doing something competent like building rail, or stockpiling oil for crises and you're like - fuck why can't my gov't have this basic competence. Why the fuck am I waiting for a basic surface light rail line in Toronto, not a subway, for 18 years... (I know why, it's a rhetorical question.)
West's opinion of China is rooted in propaganda and a sense of superiority of the west having some kind of superior democratic system than China.
Literally your next post was:
I want communist govt to have complete ideological control. I do not want one bit of right wing thought in the name of freedom and in that regards china is doing great.
Do you even know who you are?
Whats your point exactly
I think the point they are trying to make is that the far-right is generally considered the autocratic part of the spectrum, so you are being hypocritical by saying I want an autocratic government to come in and ban all autocrats.
Then they are wrong, authority is not exclusive to right wing. Anarchy is only one part of leftist ideology
Because reports of abuses are being suppressed.
By the way, this is exactly what will come to pass in the U.S. in coming months, if we don't stop it.
Human Rights Watch There's a lot more in this article, I suggest reading it, if you have the attention span.
The Chinese government controls all major channels of information, such as television, radio, and print publications. Its “Great Firewall” blocks people in China from accessing information commonly available on the internet. It also imposes ideological control over the education system.
...
Authorities continued to update the country’s censorship and surveillance regime to tighten control. In February, the State Secrets Law was revised and implementing regulations were published in July, expanding the law’s already overly broad scope. In July, the government proposed a new national digital ID card system. The cards, which are ostensibly voluntary, would give state agencies even more ability to track people online and offline.
I want communist govt to have complete ideological control. I do not want one bit of right wing thought in the name of freedom and in that regards china is doing great