this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2026
182 points (98.9% liked)

politics

29384 readers
2368 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

I was totally thinking Vance had raped the Pope from the title… and then had to check for an onion.

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Republicans are not and never were a party of faith. They are a party of marketing and lies.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Which seems totally congruent with a lot of religious people since they like being marketed and lied to.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Wow they're really afraid of the pope

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 12 points 9 hours ago

"And if it did happen, you deserved it."

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 87 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Mike Johnson is not Catholic. He's a Christian Nationalist Protestant Evangelical piece of shit. They don't even have to pretend to give a fuck about the Pope.

[–] frostysauce@lemmy.world 13 points 14 hours ago

A pontiff or any religious leader can say anything they want, but obviously if you wade into political waters, I think you should expect some political response and I think the pope has received some of that.

The actual quote.

[–] ryokimball@infosec.pub 87 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

The pope shouldn't have been dressed like that.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 9 hours ago

"Didn't half give me the horn!"

Look up Derek and Clive discussing the death of the Pope for more details.

[–] Akasazh@lemmy.world 25 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (2 children)

Such a sexy dress, he made Mike fail his masturbation pact.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

"Mitre? Well then I just might"

[–] GalacticSushi@piefed.blahaj.zone 6 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Has his son confirmed this?

[–] Akasazh@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

The arousal was so strong even the son joined in the field masturbation, only for them to discover a deep seated incest fetish.

[–] SarahValentine@lemmy.blahaj.zone 34 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Fair enough. Then so was Charlie Kirk.

Oh, not like that, huh?

[–] Saprophyte@lemmy.world 29 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

A man under a tent with the words prove me wrong written on it while arguing against gun control getting shot was definitely the definition of asking for it.

[–] GalacticSushi@piefed.blahaj.zone 18 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Don't forget that he publicly stated that gun deaths are just the cost of having the freedom to bear arms. I, for one, commend him for putting his money where his neck is.

[–] hovercat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

putting his money where his neck is.

Aww, "putting his neck on the line" was right there

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 4 points 9 hours ago

I'm still surprised Erika hasn't tried to wangle a sponsorship deal with Rainbird sprinklers.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 3 points 16 hours ago

don't forget wearing a shirt that said freedom

[–] BigMacHole@thelemmy.club 33 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

We HATE the Pope!

-People who want the Bible to be Law!

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 9 hours ago

Worse yet: people who want their sub-literate, selective interpretation of the Bible to be law.

[–] Captainautism@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

What you’re missing is that evangelicals think the Catholic Church is demonic.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 5 points 9 hours ago

They're split on that. I have family members who are white fundie evangelicals, and about a third of them I've spoken to regard Catholics as Christians, though they have doctrinal differences with them.

The other two-thirds are insane MAGA bigots who believe everyone's going to hell but themselves, and any sign of human decency is sinful. We don't hang out much.

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 13 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

1000008736

The Catholic Chick Tract is my third favorite one after D&D and the one blaming the Nazis on Catholics.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I got so much bizarre shit from some protestants growing up catholic. That's the sanest variant. There was also accusations of not being a Christian and of being a Satanist. Hell, I still occasionally hear protestants say Catholics aren't Christians

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

That's because you guys worship Ra, but are also satanists, but started the Nazis.

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 10 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

Yeah a lot of u.s Christians don't consider Catholics as Christians but more like a Jew or Muslim. No joke.

Catholics are not real Christians because they worship Mary and saints.

That's what Ive heard repeated by baptists.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Yeah I got that from time to time growing up. And as mentioned elsewhere, treating Catholics as not really American. Also got called a devil worshipper about it sometimes.

I left the church over several fundamental issues including women's rights and queer rights, but I'm still partial to it even though I'm pagan these days. I still can't fucking stand Baptists.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

I'm not Christian (or religious), but I wouldn't classify the US evangelicals as Christians. Maybe some kind of neo Christians or something, but they've drifted very far from the concepts of that religion.

As for Mormons, I don't even know what they are, some kind of wacky fan fiction that isn't canon by anyone's measure, so they're definitely in their own category.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 9 hours ago

Yeah a lot of u.s Christians don’t consider Catholics as Christians but more like a Jew or Muslim. No joke.

Believing that there are intermediaries between a person and the deity is complete anathema to any kind of Muslim (well, there used to be some veneration of Sufi saints, but they didn't pray for them to intercede). The Jewish religion is also strictly monotheistic, honors its prophets but doesn't ask them for help.

Catholics are not real Christians because they worship Mary and saints.

All non-Protestant Christians (Orthodox, Coptic, Nestorian, etc) ask Mary and the saints for a kind word to the Guy Upstairs. Some Protestants even do it, though in a toned-down way compared to Roman Catholics. And it's not quite worship, more veneration, though extreme RC manifestations of the cult of Mary might be an exception. Not that fundies can handle nuance. They're people who don't believe communion involved actual wine, that material wealth is a reward from God (with contorted fanfic trying to explain away the proverb of the camel and the eye of a needle), that having any sort of images or things of beauty in a church is idolatry (another belief shared with extremist Muslims), that the King James Bible is God's inerrant word (despite its dodgy sourcing, occasionally shoddy translation, and obolete English usage that fundies don't understand) and that their weird 19th-century heretical fractally schismatic sect somehow preserves the practices of the early Christians.

[–] rbos@lemmy.ca 6 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

Yeah, I don't think many catholics realize how close they are to the top of the list after Muslims, gays, and trans people. Atheists might be ahead of Catholics but honestly it might be a wash. Protestants seriously hate them, I got fed a steady drip of anti-Catholic sentiment as a baby Calvinist here in BC.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

As someone who grew up catholic, I really don't know how. Catholic school was very clear about how right wing populism in the US was frequently super anti catholic to the point of hate crimes. And it's not like protestants are great at hiding the contempt

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 3 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

If you want to know what Calvin was about, look into histories of the time when his followers imposed their insane misrule on Geneva. There were levels of fanaticism and totalitarianism that make the Taliban look like reasonable people, people being burned alive over micro-level sectarian grudges, corruption and extreme incompetence.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Did Hobbes at least talk some sense into him?

/s

[–] Uranus_Hz@lemmy.zip 4 points 15 hours ago

Mormons are up there too.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 23 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Leo needs to call that punk ass out and show him how Chicago deals with Antichrists

[–] SarahValentine@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 17 hours ago

Some years ago I would have laughed at the idea that the pope could be on any side of this but the wrong side. Then I found out just how stupendously, stupidly evil evil can get. I'm not laughing now.

[–] MrSmoothPP@lemmy.zip 23 points 19 hours ago

Mike Johnson is such a cowardly fucking liar

[–] Neon_Carnivore@lemmy.zip 8 points 16 hours ago

OMG! Mike Johnson raped the Pope?!?

/s

[–] Vanderdeckenscopilot@lemmy.world 12 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

These guys messing with the Pope is hilarious. I dont even do religion and I know this is gonna be fun. Are they going for the Henry the 8th method?

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Clowns who think themselves Frederick Barbarossa

[–] baeb66@lemmy.today 8 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I thought they were reactionaries in the "bring back the 1950's" sense, but they really want to bring back the 1500's. Mike is going to post his theses on supply side economics and neocon warfare on the front door of the St Louis Cathedral in NOLA.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago

I thought they were reactionaries in the "bring back the 1950's" sense, but they really want to bring back the 1500's.

Always have been. The notion that "conservatives" wanted to "conserve" anything but oligarchy (or literal monarchy, if they can get away with it) has never been anything but a lie to swindle the rubes.

[–] MushuChupacabra@piefed.world 3 points 14 hours ago

He should pray that His Holiness doesn't send or activate an embedded Jesuit.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 6 points 18 hours ago

same with that dude hes always talking about. Blessed are the peacemakers. Shut the fuck up and stay in your lane. BE-AUGH-TCH!

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 2 points 14 hours ago

Baby wines and says you had my wining coming.

Nothing happened to the pope and nothing will