this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2026
11 points (86.7% liked)

news

844 readers
817 users here now

A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.

Rules:

  1. Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
  2. Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
  3. Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
  4. Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
  5. No link shorteners
  6. No entire article in the post body

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BigDaddySlim@lemmy.world 10 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Current Postmaster General and current board member of competing company FedEx is claiming we need to raise prices and cut FERS contributions, but how about a better option.

How about we cut all the middle managers that do fuck all for us and take up $100k+ a year doing very menial jobs. There's so much overlap and so many jobs can be eliminated above the people doing the physical work delivering and sorting your mail. We have many offices with an abundance of supervisors yet they keep having hiring events for more supervisors. Locally to me we have 3 offices that could easily have it's management combined to have 1 postmaster for 3-4 of them, yet every installation has a postmaster and multiple supervisors. There's people making over $100k a year, plus usage of a postal vehicle to drive around from office to office to tell us how to submit customer leads for mailing services in the scanner, something that could be a stand-up topic.

The PO is so goddamn top heavy it's ridiculous. They tell us we waste time and money because we sit somewhere for an extra 2 minutes taking a break to cool off or warm up, but we can have 3 supervisors and a postmaster sitting around the office chit chatting all day no problem.

That's where the PO is losing money, not FERS, not fuel costs, it's overstaffed management

Edit: Also, losing money is fine for us, we are a SERVICE not a corporation, there's no shareholders, we're not for profit, we're a federal service. Is it better for us to have money? Yes, we desperately need new trucks, the LLVs are dying rapidly and parts have stopped being made. We can make other changes than cutting retirement to cover that cost as I've already stated

[–] PapaSkwat@lemmy.wtf 2 points 20 hours ago

Agreed. PO management is a mess these days.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 4 points 20 hours ago

Why not crank it up on the junk mailers instead ?