this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2026
231 points (98.7% liked)

World News

55837 readers
2095 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A Chinese company's publication of AI-enhanced satellite images of US bases in the Middle East is helping Iranian forces identify targets, US intelligence believes.

The ABC has been briefed on the intelligence by a source inside US defence, who says the images are endangering lives.

Chinese geospatial artificial intelligence and software company MizarVision, which the Chinese government has a small ownership stake in, has been publishing detailed satellite images with tagging data of multiple US military sites in the lead-up to, and during, the Iran war.

The imagery showcases an AI tool that identifies and tags military forces across vast areas, a capability that once required the resources of a national intelligence agency.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 82 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

And? Who gives a fuck. I would expect China and Russia to help Iran. Why wouldn't they?

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 53 points 3 weeks ago (22 children)

I do give a fuck. I'm glad they do because the only way I see for long term stability in that region, which affects my and my family's life in multiple ways, is for the US to lose the war as badly as possible.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 13 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I think were pretty screwed either way. If they ramp down, Iran sees them as an existential threat and ramps up nuke capability, but now with less sanctions and more money. Iran with nukes makes Israel more twitchy as they see it as an existential threat.

If USA ramps up, we're in for a long protracted war and instability.

So we're screwed either way.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I think Israel, without unlimited weapons backing of the US (a condition I think would occur if the US loses badly) would stop casual strikes against Iran. They would know they risk a barrage of missiles that they don't have the interceptors for. And if Iran gets the nuke, then MAD would be in effect. Israel seeing Iran as an existential threat now, not in the future would sit tight and perhaps even open a dialogue. The problem today is they consider Iran a threat in the future. And mind you they don't consider them a threat so much to Israel today than to their plans for expansion in Lebanon, West Bank, Syria and so on.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I think it's that they realize peak oil is over. The middle east is a geopolitical strategic position for energy, as the world is now finding out via Iran closing the SoH.

Israel realised that that is on the wane. Along with the next generations attitude towards their relationshipnwith Israel. Israel is going hard in now as they have a larger support from the USA. I fully expect that to naturally wind down due to internal US political change and global moves away from carbon fuel.

Sure, oil shocks would still bite, but nowhere near to the same level. It's why the other oil production states are desperately trying to pivot to other industries. Iran has screwed that by making them unsafe. America doesn't realize that by not protecting their allies there, in the same way they protect Israel, that they will lose them. Edit:typos

[–] Tolc@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I think middle east would be much much safer with iran having nukes

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Lol, no. The world is safer with less nukes. Allowing Israel to get nukes was a failure of the international community.

Allowing Ukraine to face repurcussions for giving up their nukes was another failure.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 5 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

The world is safer with less nukes.

The world is safer with no nukes and infinitely unsafe with infinite nukes. It's appealing to extrapolate from this that less nukes -> more safety, but that's an unjustified leap of logic. For example take the case of one nuclear state vs two nuclear states. If there's only one it can force its will on other states, but if there are two they can keep each other in check and drastically reduce the possibility of nukes actually flying.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Tolc@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

No. Look at DPRK

Iran must have nukes for stability and safety of the region

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah.. ok fair point

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 9 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Wait until ABC finds out where all of Iran's guns and munitions are made.

[–] Foni@piefed.zip 12 points 3 weeks ago

I don't know how much they have left of what Ronald Reagan sold them, oops, sorry Oliver North

[–] evenglow@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)

Wait until ABC finds out China sells a fuck ton of green tech like EVs, solar, and BESS.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 50 points 3 weeks ago

Horrors. China is doing something the USA thinks only they are allowed to do.

[–] HuudaHarkiten@piefed.social 33 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Well thats too bad.

Everyone had a nice easter? I hope you guys have monday off as well. I'm eating some crisps and watching DankPods

[–] GardenGeek@europe.pub 5 points 3 weeks ago

Based comment, have an upvote good Sir and a splendid easter!

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 31 points 3 weeks ago

Lemmy get this straight. The Trump admin was fine with satellite data being shared for all these years and then they commit a warcrime where the data is used to verify it indeed was a warcrime and now they want satellite data banned.

HMMMMMMMMMM

[–] mech@feddit.org 27 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

US is learning the hard way what "soft power" means, and what it means to lose it.

[–] i_stole_ur_taco@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 weeks ago

They’re close to the “learning” part but, if the news is any indicator, they’re still a ways off.

Something about horses and water.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] inari@piefed.zip 21 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The ABC has been briefed on the intelligence by a source inside US defence, who says the images are endangering lives.

I see. The images are endangering lives. Not the moronic decision to start a war, no no.

"Only we can kill!"

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Russia and China watch US pull a Ukraine and now have an extremely cost-effective way of harming or outright destroying US assets similar to US dumping its spare power into the Ukraine conflict.

They’d be fools not to take advantage of the opportunity, but not nearly as foolish as we were for entering this pointless war in the first place.

[–] GuyIncognito@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 weeks ago

It's not pointless, the idea is to destroy the only remaining impediment to Israel's growth. With Iran removed from the picture, the whole region can be turned into a charnel house, with Israeli settlements and startups built upon the bones of the slaughtered Arabs. The whole middle east replaced by a second America, but even more fascist.

[–] SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip 15 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

"You're fighting back against our aggression? Hey, no fair!"

e: typo

[–] TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.ca 14 points 3 weeks ago

Breaking news: Iran's allies help them against an invading force.

[–] morto@piefed.social 12 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

For people who don't know, china doesn't have satellite imagery with the same spatial resolution as the private companies like planet labs (the one recently prohibited to publish imagery from the war region) do , but they have been investing a lot into super-resolution technology to compensate. This is much more interesting than it can look at a first glance.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Super-resolution as using generative models to "enhance" subresolution images with enough of the right training data?

[–] morto@piefed.social 13 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

Oh, that kind of super-resolution has been gaining media attention, but there's much more beyond the "ai". There are several mathematical methods, based on inverting a point-spread-function, statistical methods, super-resolution based on extracting subpixel information from a sequence of low resolution images, and several other methods and approaches, including the use of machine learning, but not in the generative way. It's a very diverse and complex field of research

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 weeks ago

Oh no! Anyway...

[–] Asfalttikyntaja@sopuli.xyz 8 points 3 weeks ago

Good to know that Russia isn’t helping its allies with their intelligence. In that case Trump would be very upset, if he could think.

[–] Tolc@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] mriormro@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

China as a state, just like the US, is a massive piece of shit. It does not need deference.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Fitting, considering this war is merely a steppingstone to war with China.

[–] nosuchanon@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

"Fool! You fell victim to one of the classic blunders. The most famous is 'Never get involved in a land war in Asia,' but only slightly less well known is this: 'Never go in against a Sicilian when death is on the line.'"

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

if it is, the USA is completely fucked… no amount of money can overcome this level of ineptitude

[–] roserose56@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 weeks ago

Not surprised at all. Don't fucking pretend China was not in game.....

load more comments
view more: next ›