this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2026
632 points (99.2% liked)

World News

55500 readers
2675 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 192 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They talk like he didn't threaten to declare war on Europe just a few months ago to invade Greenland. The world has been fed up with his shit for a long time now.

[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 34 points 1 week ago

Long past time to say it openly, but now is second best.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DandomRude@piefed.social 139 points 1 week ago (8 children)

In essence, the world (and the media as well) should treat the U.S. exactly as it behaves: as a failed state that, like Russia, is ruled by organized crime, tramples on international law, and blackmails its former allies. One should not do business with such a country, especially since it is committing the most egregious war crimes alongside its genocidal allies in Israel.

It is a reflection of the lack of integrity in the political systems of other countries that no sanctions have been imposed on the US in response to its brutal actions in Iran - this war is just as much a war of aggression in violation of international law as the one Russia is waging against Ukraine.

Sanctions against the U.S. will, of course, not happen. But the barbaric behavior of the U.S. should at least ensure that Western countries turn away from the U.S. in the future, so that it cannot continue to exploit its power to blackmail the world.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 44 points 1 week ago (1 children)

First everybody needs to get their gold out of the USA, switch over all critical infrastructure and payment to home brew solutions and sell USA treasuries. Then the sanctions can start. But switching away from USA infrastructure in already a form of sanction.

[–] reev@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 week ago

Stuff like Wero matters and is making actual progress. Once they open up to merchants I hope to see it being a realistic homebrew payment network.

[–] nogooduser@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (4 children)

It is a reflection of the lack of integrity in the political systems of other countries that no sanctions have been imposed on the US in response to its brutal actions in Iran - this war is just as much a war of aggression in violation of international law as the one Russia is waging against Ukraine.

I don’t think that it’s a lack of integrity that’s resulted in sanctions not being applied against the US. We just wouldn’t be able to weather the financial consequences of sanctioning them.

Integrity is lacking but I don’t think that a government with 100% integrity would be able to afford to sanction the US.

[–] prex@aussie.zone 12 points 1 week ago

+1
While instant sanctions haven't been put in place there is a lot of 'decoupling' going on.
While this doesn't have the same shock value, the long term effects are there.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] JustTesting@lemmy.hogru.ch 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think they also need to come up with a better term than 'western countries', to something that does not include the US but is open to include others. 'Countries that try to not be complete asshats'? Idk, the bar is in hell. But there are quite a few non-western countries that could fit the bill if it weren't for US fuckery.

[–] DandomRude@piefed.social 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes, we really need an alternative to the UN, because unfortunately it cannot be reformed due to the veto system and the fact that the most powerful countries have permanent seats on the Security Council.

So what is needed is a new international organization that addresses the fact that the UN has, in fact, long been under the unilateral influence of the US in particular - the fact that Israel, for example, gets away with outright genocide with complete impunity, unfortunately makes all too clear how absurd it is that a single, admittedly very powerful country can prevent any efforts to enforce what is, in fact, the central task of the international community.

So yes, I agree: We need a second, better UN.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tristan@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 11 points 1 week ago

Definitely. The world was so quick to sanction Russia for its invasion, but the US faces no consequences for its actions…

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 week ago

Same applies to Israel. BDS should be taken seriously.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] metakrakalaka@lemmychan.org 76 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As usual, people are only upset with him because he's now costing them money.

The world is run by shitbags.

[–] orbitz@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago

Well democratic (Western ones) countries don't often show how upset they are with other western countries unless it impacts them. They may not condone actions but I'm pretty sure none of them ever liked dealing with Trump.

There's that one picture of Trump in his first term sitting down while (I think) Merkle(sp?) was trying to explain something, there were other people in the shot and all (or mostly standing facing Trump) while he looked like a kid getting a lesson. They were okay for internal issues, well maybe not fine but mostly they wouldn't say anything, but this round he's fucked the world economy so yeah make sense. So I think they voiced their opinions previously as well just not in headlines as much.

Also the US has taken the lead so often, and (used to have) soft power that they managed properly.

Basically Trump (well his handlers) have effed up the social order so much it's time to set the line. Sucks it took this long, cause all should have been done first term when the US elected a petulant child as leader.

Though I imagine it comes down to money as usual as you said, cause heaven forbid we figure out a way to run a country without billionaires making their voice known.

It'd be great if the people's voices were heard for sure. Fortunately when time comes there are more of the regular folk than them. While I don't condone violence it sucks that they can use violence and legal issues to make their goals happen without pushback.

[–] Foni@piefed.zip 75 points 1 week ago (11 children)

The only reason the alliances aren't formally broken is because moving investments and reorganizing supplies takes time. At least from the European perspective, it's only a matter of time; the moves to abandon Visa and Mastercard can only be interpreted that way.

[–] HuudaHarkiten@piefed.social 33 points 1 week ago

This exactly. I find it completely baffling that people are talking about this stuff like its as simple as changing your mobile internet provider or cancelling your Amazon account.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

moving investments and reorganizing supplies takes time.

This is a salient point. Back in February 2025 when Donald decided to start imposing unilateral tariffs, other countries started crafting new trade agreements. Those take 1.5 to 2 years to take effect, so everything Donald is doing is, essentially, a time bomb that's going to go off after 2026 whether it's the BBB or our former allies rerouting trade around the US and through China. The vast majority of Americans don't have any real knowledge of what these things mean or Donald would be even more unpopular than he is now.

In 2028 the new order in the world will probably unrecognizable compared to 2024, and it could be a very bad thing. We Americans have been lucky in that most of us have never experienced real war and can't contextualize it, and that could change in the very near future.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 57 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, where's that '30 days before congressional review' thing? The us is full of shit. And not only in the white house.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 10 points 1 week ago

60 days, and it's not a review.

[–] FistingEnthusiast@lemmy.world 47 points 1 week ago
[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 45 points 1 week ago (3 children)

one of the most annoying things is even if we get a "blue wave" and get maga out of the presidency and congress you know that two years in they will be loudly blaming whoever is president and the democrats as we are not doing great with all the infaltion and being an isolated country whos currency is becoming regional.

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.wtf 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Does a strict two party system even constitute a democracy? There's so little incentive to do what the people want when the worst punishment is that you only have to wait until the other party fucks up worse than you did and then you're back in the game. In the meantime, just sit tight and snipe from the sidelines.

The Republican Party needs to cease to exist for what it's done. I don't know how that could happen but I don't see a bright future for the world if they're still around when the next Dem President starts to become unpopular.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

If the democrats win as well as we're expecting they COULD take down billionaires and mass media propaganda machines that's behind all these right-wing movements...but I'm betting they won't. They probably won't abolish ICE, they won't stuff the supreme court, they won't cut off Israel, they won't roll back the insane power of the POTUS and executive branch, etc, etc.

This country is fucked for a generation at least, or as long as this two party government remains intact.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 41 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I think I missed this going by:

But the byzantine web of knock-on effects from Trump's pronouncements — let's not call them policies — in the past five weeks means that Russia is facing a huge boom in its finances thanks to the US decision to lift sanctions on Russian oil in a bid to ease the global market which, of course, is in chaos because of the Iranian response to US and Israeli attacks.

[–] Naich@piefed.world 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 10 points 1 week ago

tramp is an idiot narcissist criminal (etc.). That makes him an easy target of manipulation for russia (an asset, so to say)

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] sepi@piefed.social 39 points 1 week ago (2 children)

We must send the turd, his cabinet, and pentagon leadership to the Hague.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

It's a nice thought, but there's no way. We here in the US didn't even kill the leaders of the Confederacy after the civil war, and those fuckers got hundreds of thousands of Americans killed in their treason.

The reason why cancel culture is so big here is that, often, getting someone canceled is the only meaningful recourse for being a piece of shit.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] LogicalDrivel@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

That would just open the door for the treasonous twat to invade the Netherlands. Its even been codified. Yes really.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Service-Members_Protection_Act

[–] Tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago

They don't really care for "rules" or "laws" unless they can use them to oppress people anyway

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] atropa@piefed.social 34 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It never was, its about the epstein files

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Glazing Netanyahu was also a not insignificant part.

[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

That's where it was about Iran, Benjy's decades-long lust for war and territorial expansion

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It’s about a confluence of things, none of them good. I wasn’t going to comment, but then I saw this post:

https://mander.xyz/post/49900218

This is basically “what it’s all about”. Western neoliberal and overt colonial capitalism. Its extraction. All these rich elites are betting on the U.S. military maintaining “full spectrum dominance”, and if Iran fends us off, that’s the end of our projection of power, globally at least.

When you see Bezos and Musk and Altman and all these other parasitic freaks retreating to New Zealand, those are the biggest, fattest rats fleeing a sinking ship.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip 31 points 1 week ago

I lost patience 8 years ago when it was obvious he was a disaster for the commoner, and that the elites saw that disaster as a ladder. It's all been very clear for a while now.

[–] Vorticity@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They didn't lose patience with him like eight years ago? These people must have the patience of saints.

[–] wizzor@sopuli.xyz 19 points 1 week ago

No longer? It never was

[–] manxu@piefed.social 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)

... world leaders are increasingly just dismissing the US President, his offensive taunts and, more importantly, any notion that there is method in his madness.

There is something about this particular war that is bonkers erratic even by the standards of this lunatic. It's as if he had been goaded into it, told to start it, without any reasoning at all. There was no plan, there was no rationale, there was no goal, there was no warning, there was no consultation.

There just was a military force that did whatever it was told to do, without ever questioning anything about it - legality, operational effectiveness, long-term consequences.

Now I appreciate the countries that make a figurehead head of state the nominal commander in chief of the military. It's a really stupid idea to vest control of the armed forces in someone with real power.

[–] Transcendant@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

any notion that there is method in his madness.

There IS method in his madness. Just, it's mostly not his method, you've got to peek behind the curtain. You have to remember with Trump, all he cares about is money and the appearance of 'winning'. A lot of his 'confusing' rhetoric is designed to pump 'n dump the market, so he and his close associates can make big bets for big profit.

For the darker intentions, you need to look to people like Peter Thiel, Curtis Yarvin, Heritage Society. They've literally stated all their intentions in the P2025 documents.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Zelenskyy clearly hopes to tap into the riches of the Gulf states as investors in Ukraine's burgeoning military weapons industry, and potentially as aid donors, or even allies.

For the headline about Trump the article talks mostly about Zelenskyy.

Finally at the end it talks about Trump's speech.

The week ended with a feeling of foreboding around the globe that things were going to get a lot worse, and not just because of Trump's language about bombing Iran "back to the Stone Ages".

And throws in Israel and Russia to conclude:

The Caspian Sea. The Baltic. The Red Sea. This war is no longer just about the Strait of Hormuz. Or Iran.

[–] 3abas@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

The headline isn't about Trump, it's about the war not being about Iran...

[–] nightwatch_admin@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It’s a pretty good article, and, while the headline is pretty accurate, it doesn’t do the content justice.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 12 points 1 week ago

they should come out admit hes only doing this to distract from epstein files, but they wont, because they have people in thier own countries being named epstein files.

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 9 points 1 week ago

I doubt it, just the other day like 30 countries got together to blame Iran on Hormuz strait closing. No words about the real culprit. We are still in an appeasing phase. 🤷

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What are they gonna do about it?

[–] HuudaHarkiten@piefed.social 13 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Dismantling a intertwined global system that has been built in the last 80 years can't be done in an afternoon.

I hate the US as much as the other people here, I want to get rid of them and their influence on us as much as the next guy, but its completely unrealistic to do it suddenly and in a speedy manner. Its a deep swamp and we are up to our necks in it, we need to dig ourselves out carefully so we dont sink deeper.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›