this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2026
668 points (99.0% liked)

Selfhosted

59797 readers
365 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] esc@piefed.social 165 points 2 months ago (32 children)

Don't expose jellyfin to the internet is a golden rule.

[–] Damarus@feddit.org 113 points 2 months ago (28 children)

Kinda defeats the purpose of a media server built to be used by multiple people

[–] InnerScientist@lemmy.world 56 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Use a VPN, it's not ideal but it's secure.

[–] faercol@lemmy.blahaj.zone 40 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Somehow difficult to install on a TV though.

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 25 points 2 months ago (2 children)

That’s why you do it at your router or gateway and then set a route for the Jellyfin server through the VPN adapter. That way any device on your network will flow through the tunnel to the Jellyfin server including TVs

[–] faercol@lemmy.blahaj.zone 44 points 2 months ago

Which again implies that you have a router that allows you to do so. It's not always the case. For tech enthusiast people that's the case. But not for everyone.

I tried to do the same thing at first, but it was a pain, there were tons of issues.

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Oh yes, the routers and gateways that most people have that are isp provided that may not actually have open VPN or wireguard support.

Those ones?

Also putting a VPN in someone else's house so that all their Network traffic goes through your gateway is pretty damn extreme.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (27 replies)
[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 68 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (27 children)

That’s never made sense to me; why build an authn frontend instead of just clicking your user if the security is just an illusion anyways. “Use a VPN” is fine for a mainframe, but an active project in 2026 should aspire to be better.

Edit: or make note of that on their several pages with reverse proxy configuration.

Examples dating back over six years https://github.com/jellyfin/jellyfin/issues/5415

[–] AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip 36 points 2 months ago

I mean I'm sure they'd like to just ship safe code in the first place. But if that's not their expertise and they demonstrate that repeatedly, we gotta take steps ourselves. Secure is obviously best, but I'd rather have insecure Jellyfin behind a VPN than no Jellyfin at all.

[–] IratePirate@feddit.org 26 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

It's not this or that. Security comes in layers. So while I would assume that the Jellyfin developers do their best to secure their application, I acknowledge the fact that bugs do exist and that Jellyfin is developed in and for hobbyist contexts, and thus not scrutinised and pentested for vulnerabilities in the way software meant for professional environments would be. Therefore I'll add an extra layer of security by putting it behind a VPN that only whitelisted clients can access. If a vulnerability is detected, I can be sure it hasn't already been exploited to compromise my server because we're all "among friends" there.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (25 replies)
[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

Y'all are assuming the security issue is something exploitable without authentication or has something to do with auth.

But it it could be a supply chain issue which a VPN won't protect you from.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] LycaKnight@infosec.pub 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, i have my 30 docker containers behind Headscale (Tailscale).

[–] pfr@piefed.social 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lemmchen@feddit.org 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The thing is, if you have non-technical users, you have to set up the VPN connection on the client site yourself, maybe on multiple machines and more than once, if they decide to upgrade or even just reset their devices.

[–] esc@piefed.social 19 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

The problem here - it's not me who requires access to my library, if someone isn't willing or able to do it, I'm sorry but that's just how it is. People should stop infantilize non-technical people, absolute majority of them is capable of navigating our world without much problems and I'm willing to help them if help is asked.

If my 60 y.o. mother with close to zero technical skills can do it with limited help (due to distance and other constraints) I'm pretty sure that majority of people with sound mind can.

[–] Lemmchen@feddit.org 8 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Or you can not be arrogant towards your friends and family who have probably helped you on lots of occasions and will probably keep being there for you in the future.
Idk man, unconditional sharing feels pretty good, tbh. Making them jump through hoops isn't really my jam. To me this kinda all plays into making a stronger bond with people that are close to me, so maybe we have different reasons for why we are sharing our stuff.

Inb4 "we are not the same" meme

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

So use a reverse proxy with authentiacation before access to Jellyfin is allowed. I use Caddy forward_auth with Authelia for this. Unless you also want to use the apps without VPN, this works great.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (27 replies)
[–] clif@lemmy.world 115 points 2 months ago (9 children)

Thank you for posting this. I tend to get a lot of my opensource project info from Lemmy so people who take the time to post it are awesome.

Just updated my home instance. Can confirm that 10.11.7 is available in the Debian repos and the update went perfect. I got a new kernel in the same update : D

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] catlover@sh.itjust.works 50 points 2 months ago

I forgot that it's April first, and was wondering what catasthropic event had happend in order that it had to be stated in the title that its not a joke

[–] Burghler@sh.itjust.works 39 points 2 months ago (8 children)

Wonder if it's the Axios one. Sounds like it isn't from their description though hmm

[–] doeknius_gloek@discuss.tchncs.de 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't think so, the previous release 10.11.6 is a few months old and the axios supply chain attack happened yesterday.

[–] Strit@lemmy.linuxuserspace.show 13 points 2 months ago

So lets hope this 10.11.7 is not subject to the axios one. :)

[–] rollerbang@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Diff agrees, not likely. Might be permisson related, elevation of privileges.

[–] r00ty@kbin.life 14 points 2 months ago (3 children)

From a cursory look at just the security commits. Looks like the following:

  • GHSA-j2hf-x4q5-47j3: Checks if a media shortcut is empty, and checks if it is remote and stores the remote protocol if so. Also prevent strm files (these are meant to contain links to a stream) from referencing local files. Indeed this might have been used to reference files jellyfin couldn't usually see?
  • GHSA-8fw7-f233-ffr8: Seems to be similar, except for M3U file link validation and limiting allowed protocols. It also changes the default permissions for live TV management to false.
  • GHSA-v2jv-54xj-h76w: When creating a structure there should be a limit of 200 characters for a string which was not enforced.
  • GHSA-jh22-fw8w-2v9x: Not really completely sure here. They change regex to regexstr in a lot of places and it looks like some extra validation around choosing transcoding settings.

I'm not really sure how serious any of these are, or how they could be exploited however. Well aside from the local file in stream files one.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] webkitten@piefed.social 28 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Pretty flawless update from the apt repo on my end.

Server version 10.11.7  
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] varnia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 2 months ago (5 children)

There is a good reason I only have Jellyfin and other services accessible via valid Client Certificate.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] psoul@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (20 children)

Is it standard practice to release the security updates on GitHub?

I am a very amateur self hoster and wouldn't go on the github of projects on my own unless I wanted to read the "read me" for install instructions. I am realizing that I got aware I needed to update my Jellyfin container ASAP only thanks to this post. I would have never checked the GitHub.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

You can always tell who does real IT work in these threads lol

[–] cholesterol@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

In the raspian repos, just updated, thanks.

[–] Strit@lemmy.linuxuserspace.show 8 points 2 months ago

also in the docker repository.

[–] sefra1@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Good thing my Jellyfin is behind Wireguard.

Consider doing the same if your usecase permits.

load more comments
view more: next ›