this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2026
87 points (97.8% liked)

politics

29120 readers
2385 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

AI images of people – such as women in military contexts – are making money and serving as propaganda, researchers say

Online content creators are not just building fake images and videos of prominent public figures, they are also fabricating people and using them in military contexts, which can make them money and even serve as effective propaganda, according to artificial intelligence researchers.

Some of these online avatars are sexualized images of women wearing camouflage garb that have generated a significant audience and helped create an idealized image of political figures like Donald Trump, even if the viewer knows the content is not real, according to experts.

"We are blending the lines between political cartoons and reality," said Daniel Schiff, an assistant professor of technology policy at Purdue University and co-director of the Governance and Responsible AI Lab (Grail). "A lot of people feel like these images or videos or the stories they convey, feel true."

The amount of political deepfakes has increased dramatically in recent years, according to a Grail database. Since the start of 2025, the organization has catalogued more than 1,000 English language social media posts featuring fake images or videos of prominent political figures and politically important social issues and events.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pirate2377@lemmy.zip 2 points 20 hours ago

What was that phrase that Ben Shapiro (the former face of the online right) used to be famous for again?

[–] vegeta@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago
[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Same principle as political comics, the value is that people feel the comic removes a mask from reality and depicts how things really are, thus qualifying it as essentially more referent to reality than reality itself. But of course this is only ever just a reflection of their own internally constructed internal reality, and they pick the comic that is the best mirror of that.

[–] BygoneNeutrino@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Another thing to consider is the fact that people can form false memories. A person might know at the time of exposure that the misinformation is misinformation, but he might misremember it as a fact after repeated exposure.

People don't care about reality, they just care about their ego.

[–] CannonFodder@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So how to fight it? Just do the same back, or lose again?

[–] endless_nameless@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

It might help if Democrats started doing things

[–] etherphon@piefed.world 1 points 1 day ago

I've literally never uttered or thought that phrase in my life before, if something isn't true it's not true. There is no feelings to it. Anyways, it's probably best not to expose yourself to these images if at all possible, but of course, people are going to keep using these platforms because they're fucking stupid.

[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Dont look up...