this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2026
294 points (98.0% liked)

World News

54862 readers
2712 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A video shared by Tehran Times claims to show the moment a US F-35 fighter jet was hit during a combat mission over Iranian airspace. The clip shows the aircraft appearing to take damage, with explosions, smoke trails, and the jet veering off course mid-air.


A US F-35 fighter jet was attacked during an Iranian strike and forced to make an emergency landing at a military base in the Middle East, according to CNN. The claim, first made by Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), would mark the first known instance of Iran hitting one of the US military’s most advanced and expensive aircraft in the ongoing conflict in Middle East.

According to the IRGC, the stealth jet was struck by air defence systems over central Iran in the early hours of Thursday. A video shared by Tehran Times claims to show the moment a US F-35 fighter jet was hit during a combat mission over Iranian airspace. The clip shows the aircraft appearing to take damage, with explosions, smoke trails, and the jet veering off course midair.

In a statement, the IRGC said it had "struck and seriously damaged" the aircraft at around 2.50 am (local time), adding that the jet’s fate remains unclear and that there is a "high possibility" it may have crashed. The group also said the operation followed the interception of more than 125 US-Israeli drones, calling it evidence of improvements in Iran’s air defence systems.

If confirmed, the incident would mark the first time Iran has successfully targeted an F-35, a fifth-generation fighter jet that costs more than $100 million and is considered a cornerstone of US air power. Both the US and Israel have been deploying F-35s extensively since the conflict escalated on February 28.


US CONFIRMS EMERGENCY LANDING, PLAYS DOWN DAMAGE

According to CNN, US Central Command said the aircraft was "flying a combat mission over Iran" when it was forced to make an emergency landing. "The aircraft landed safely, and the pilot is in stable condition," spokesman Captain Tim Hawkins told CNN. "This incident is under investigation."

However, Washington has not issued any official statement. The Pentagon said its operations are going as planned, with Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth saying the US is "winning decisively" and that Iran’s air defences have been "flattened".

Amid escalating conflict, at least 16 US aircraft have reportedly been destroyed since the start of the war, including 10 Reaper drones, while several others have been damaged in combat or accidents.


[ADDENDUM]

The actual video of the event, plus more, from The Hindustan Times:

https://youtube.com/watch?v=YZZAGO0rkLk

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 1 points 41 minutes ago

Doubt it, that was just some swamp gas reflecting Venus's light off noctilucent clouds.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

That's it then. Canada, buy those Gripens and avoid the F35s.

[–] mirshafie@europe.pub 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Gripen can also sneak up on, out-manoveur and take down F35s btw.

[–] Lagviper@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Good for the pilot he made it back to base but that F35 is as good as lost more than likely with the costs of repair these things have

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

That's actually a very good point.

If the things cost roughly $100 million each... yeah that's not gonna be a cheap or easy repair, may actually just make more sense to part it out.

[–] ozymandias117@lemmy.world 2 points 46 minutes ago

The current Hegseth administration has also removed the requirements for Right to Repair from DOD contracts, so Lockheed can charge as many millions as they want on repairs

[–] TwilitSky@lemmy.world 8 points 3 hours ago

Still safer than Boeing.

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 7 points 3 hours ago

I just know we're all just waiting for their toddler in chief to publicly call the pilots losers and suckers. "I like pilots who don't get shot down."

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

A video shared by Tehran Times claims to show the moment a US F-35 fighter jet was hit during a combat mission over Iranian airspace. The clip shows the aircraft appearing to take damage, with explosions, smoke trails, and the jet veering off course midair.

Where's the video showing this.

[–] apftwb@lemmy.world 15 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

All of American's adversaries are going to want to exchange notes with Iran on how they managed that.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (2 children)

Looks like it was done via thermals, stealth aircraft is for radar to my knowledge, and maybe not the most effective against thermal targeting. I could be wrong though

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 3 points 40 minutes ago

Stealth just means low observable, there are ways to reduce the IR signature of jet engines, at the expense of either thrust or even more complex and expensive systems, such as what the F-22/F-23 use.

[–] selfAwareCoder@programming.dev 5 points 3 hours ago

Pretty much, thermals require being much closer and are only good from certain directions, so the stealth is entirely focused against radar missiles that can be shot from far out of sight and don't need to be behind the enemy

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 13 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Welp.

That was much faster than even I was expecting.

[–] just_an_average_joe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Iran said they were holding back due to ramadan cuz its a holy month and they shouldn't be doing war in holy months.

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 9 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Eid Mubarak, America.

I'm not glad for this war, but given that it is happening, I gotta admit that I am glad to see US hubris challenged so thoroughly

[–] Pollo_Jack@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

God damn russia hit the jackpot getting this pedophile in office

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 44 points 23 hours ago (14 children)

A plane that cost $1trillion dollars to develop was almost taken out by normal munitions. If this can be done again Americans air superiority is cooked.

[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 7 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

But the purpose of these planes is to please shareholders.

[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 9 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Duck US imperialism, but its stealth not bulletproof, 1 getting shot doesn't really show anything.

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 4 points 6 hours ago
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 9 points 11 hours ago

Yeah but it has 3 more cupholders than Chinese fighter jets and Apple Carplay.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 14 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (4 children)

If this can be done again Americans air superiority is cooked.

Wouldn't that depend on how successful US is at shooting down Chinese planes and how many planes each one has? If China can damage one F-35 in, let's say, 5% of the missions US is sending but US can shoot down 90% of Chinese fighters it sees and they have similar numbers of planes, wouldn't US still have air superiority?

[–] Pollo_Jack@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Considering the Chinese have all of our F-35 development blueprints and all our other development blueprints, yeah shit is fucked. Opsec for DoD contractors has been trash for at least twenty years and before that it was easy enough to simply bribe someone because healthcare costs compromise almost every us citizen.

Sure and if I made 90% of my basketball shots and Lebron James missed 90% of them I'd beat him in basketball.

[–] GuyIncognito@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I mean yeah, theoretically, but that ain't happening. China is a peer competitor with the same level of technology as the US, while Iran is a scrappy underdog. China also massively outproduces the US.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Let's hope we will never find out if that's true.

[–] GuyIncognito@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 hours ago

Or if we do, it's a limited engagement that doesn't end with nukes flying. Iran winning this war will make future wars less likely, so I'm hoping for that as well.

[–] just_an_average_joe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Do you remember last year when Pakistan shot down 3 rafaels? It was chinese aircrafts operating chinese missiles. Only the pilots were Pakistani.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, my numbers are just examples. What I'm saying is that one hit doesn't end air superiority. You need to know how effective both sides are at eliminating targets.

Right, that's why they said if it happens again, and yes because if you lose 10% of your planes each day you have to stop sending the planes unless you want to get them all blown up in ten days.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Gork@sopuli.xyz 71 points 1 day ago (5 children)

However, Washington has not issued any official statement. The Pentagon said its operations are going as planned, with Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth saying the US is "winning decisively" and that Iran’s air defences have been "flattened".

I see we're going full Baghdad Bob here.

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 1 points 3 hours ago

They're gonna be awkwardly standing behind their Great Leader as he insults and derides the pilots, possibly by name, on international media, for getting hit.

[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

The US would never admit an F35 was hit. There would have be to be substantial evidence for them to even consider it.

The real answer will come on Monday when the market opens.

[–] DaMummy@hilariouschaos.com 1 points 1 hour ago

Trump just confirmed that for the first time in history, birds are real. And one of them managed to hit a $100mil jet.

[–] eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 7 hours ago

Reminds me of a poker player losing on the river and yelling "you were drawing dead"!

Guess not, buddy.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›