Well the front fell off
this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2026
52 points (96.4% liked)
Hardware
6567 readers
115 users here now
All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.
Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:
- Augmented Reality - !augmented_reality@lemmy.world
- Gaming Laptops - !gaminglaptops@piefed.social
- Laptops - !laptops@piefed.social
- Linux Hardware - !linuxhardware@programming.dev
- Linux Phones - !linuxphones@lemmy.ca
- Mechanical Keyboards - !mechanical_keyboards@programming.dev
- Monitors - !monitors@piefed.social
- Raspberry Pi - !raspberry_pi@programming.dev
- Retro Computing - !retrocomputing@lemmy.sdf.org
- Virtual Reality - !virtualreality@lemmy.world
Rules (Click to Expand):
-
Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about
-
Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.
-
No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.
-
Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.
-
Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).
-
If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.
Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Oh... Samsung, the new Google
Hahaha
Lmfao.
It's the only foldable that actually makes sense.
It better makes sense because it cost like 3 high end phones :)
3 times the screen 3 times the price.
How does it make sense? They call it a Tri Fold but it only folds twice, not three times.
It's a phone and a tablet in one but costs more than the two of them together, even if the tablets are an iPhone Pro and an iPad Pro.
Make it make sense.
It folds into three sections. Trifold.
Can they stop a sale if it was not selling?... maybe stop "offering" tehehehehehe
Did you read the article?
"Samsung didn’t offer a rationale for this decision, but poor sales probably isn’t it. While the phone retailed for a whopping $2,899, Samsung was selling every unit it could produce. The company’s website actually teased restocks until recently, and desperate buyers were paying above MSRP on the second-hand market."
Of course I didn't! who do you think I am hehehe.
Having said that, this makes little sense.. was Samsung producing 100 a week?
Rule 1: never read the article