Hardware

6567 readers

120 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.

Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Augmented Reality - !augmented_reality@lemmy.world
Gaming Laptops - !gaminglaptops@piefed.social
Laptops - !laptops@piefed.social
Linux Hardware - !linuxhardware@programming.dev
Linux Phones - !linuxphones@lemmy.ca
Mechanical Keyboards - !mechanical_keyboards@programming.dev
Monitors - !monitors@piefed.social
Raspberry Pi - !raspberry_pi@programming.dev
Retro Computing - !retrocomputing@lemmy.sdf.org
Virtual Reality - !virtualreality@lemmy.world

Rules (Click to Expand):

Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about
Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.
No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.
Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.
Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).
If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world

Rekall_Incorporated@piefed.social

After three months, Samsung is ending sales of the $2,899 Galaxy Z TriFold (arstechnica.com)

submitted 11 hours ago by Rekall_Incorporated@piefed.social to c/hardware@lemmy.world

15 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Samsung didn't offer an explanation for its decision, but it's not exactly a surprise.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Can they stop a sale if it was not selling?... maybe stop "offering" tehehehehehe

[–] cRazi_man@europe.pub 11 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Did you read the article?

"Samsung didn’t offer a rationale for this decision, but poor sales probably isn’t it. While the phone retailed for a whopping $2,899, Samsung was selling every unit it could produce. The company’s website actually teased restocks until recently, and desperate buyers were paying above MSRP on the second-hand market."

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Of course I didn't! who do you think I am hehehe.

Having said that, this makes little sense.. was Samsung producing 100 a week?

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 hours ago

Rule 1: never read the article