this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2026
336 points (98.8% liked)

Privacy

9250 readers
12 users here now

A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy

Rules:

  1. Be civil
  2. No spam posting
  3. Keep posts on-topic
  4. No trolling

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 118 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Can everyone chill for just a fucking second, the deluge of insane news this week is unreal

[–] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 96 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's the point. Do enough crazy shit at once and most of it will be overlooked.

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I get that, but I also cannot myself keep up, I’m fucking losing it

[–] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

Take a break. Come back when you're ready.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

That article shows a list of first day executive orders... Normal presidents have zero or one.. then Biden had a few, and then trump had 26. Flood indeed

[–] ozoned@piefed.social 53 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Honestly, I look at this and I see a future where everyone runs their own Federated services. I can verify my child's age as well as mine and I'm the best one to decide what they can and can't see. So I only need to worry about me and my family.

Or a local community can run it for themselves.

A forced move away from social media, because they can't afford the risk, to one where we all run our own stuff and can follow who we want.

This is only 1 possible outcome of course, and it's wildly idealist, but it's a future I'm going to push for no matter what. So I'm very biased, so don't take my opinion into account. :D

[–] Luminous5481@anarchist.nexus 27 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Honestly, I look at this and I see a future where everyone runs their own Federated services

on mesh networks. these already exist for basic communication, and are pretty cheap to be a part of since you can either purchase ready-to-use communicators, or make your own. the relays can also run off very small solar panels, and be stuck in a tree, on a post, or on a roof because they are tiny. best of all, the government can't control them and they feature E2EE.

[–] unconsciousvoidling@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

you got any tutorials or suggested hardware to join a mesh network? id be interested... it's only a matter of time before the public internet is just unusable.

[–] ZeroPoke@fedia.io 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not internet level replacement. But Meshcore running on ESP32 is pretty neat. I recently set up my RasPi 4b with a LoRa Hat and set it up using pymc_repeater to set it up a repeater at my apt. https://meshcore.co.uk/

[–] batmaniam@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] 5wim@infosec.pub 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

To join you need to either have an established mesh network already (assuming you don't want to start a ISP)

[–] unconsciousvoidling@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago (3 children)

right i found meshtastic.org through lemmy ... and its a cool concept ... purchase some hardware and join the network... download app... and you can do text communication... i was just wondering if there were more robust mesh networks with more capabilities than a text message. id rather just get prepared for when the rug is pulled out from underneath us and we have to get an anal cavity search just to check the weather.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What exactly are you looking for?

[–] ignirtoq@feddit.online 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not OP, but I personally would like to see a mesh-based low-bandwidth HTTP alternative, like Gemini. A tool set for sharing things more persistent than text messaging (or ideally building other digital services with) while being compatible with the underlying lower performance hardware and wireless medium.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Http doesn't have that much overhead (especially when you want to send things in the MB range)

What kinds of applications are you talking about? Are you thinking TCP/IP connectivity or something slower?

You can build a network mesh out of wireless point to point and 802.11s mesh networks. It is all TCP/IP networking so you can run any application you want over it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Babel_(protocol)

https://www.open-mesh.org/projects/batman-adv/wiki/Wiki

Edit:

I forgot about HaLow. It is lower bandwidth but it has a much longer range. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.11ah

[–] sobchak@programming.dev 3 points 1 week ago

There are a few metros around the world that have higher speed community networks (NYC Mesh, Freifunk, etc). If you get a HAM license, you could try participating in stuff like AREDN which uses modified WiFi access points. Depending on where you are, you'd likely have to start a group or club to start building out infrastructure.

Reticulum seems cool since it can work over all kinds of different networking technologies, even regular ol' WiFi and whatnot. Higher bandwidth channels can talk to lower bandwidth channels, and vice versa.

It has its own problems with scale and actual users out in the wild, as well as I believe some issues getting proper code contributions and consistent maintenance.

[–] DFX4509B@lemmy.wtf 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

the government can’t control them

  • They can use signal jammers to take them out pretty easily.
[–] Luminous5481@anarchist.nexus 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

well if the government wants to put signal jammers every mile or so in order to jam a mesh network, then good on them. they'll have spent trillions of dollars and years upon years building the infrastructure.

and if they don't spend trillions to blanket the entire country with jammers, then it would be absolutely pointless because the network would just work around whatever gaps there are, just as it does today.

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No. They identify your location, confiscate all your stuff, give you a stiff fine and then send you to jail.

[–] Luminous5481@anarchist.nexus 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, they’re already trying to go after people who criticize them, and they control vast swaths of the internet, so I’m not going to let some handwringing about what they might do stop me.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I like to join your community and you can help me setup one for me and my family. Fuck social media and corporate.

[–] ozoned@piefed.social 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I have a Matrix #the-ozoned:matrix.org . While I don't know a lot, I have quite a few number of folks that do. Or we can all learn and figure things out! I'm often here or on @ozoned@btfree.social as well as my Peertube, TubeFree.org, powered by my nonprofit BTfree.org.

Just say what you need and we can find someone that can make it happen. :-)

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Thank you definitely going check all that out.

[–] Tanoh@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Honestly, I look at this and I see a future where everyone runs their own Federated services

I very much doubt it. People in general just don't care, or even worse. They think that it is a good thing as it keeps baddies out (it won't) and it will protect them (it won't).

It seems line very dark times are ahead. Self hosting is good, but it also gives the other side a bright shining beacon to go after. If they know everything about 99% of the population already, they can spend a lot more resources to really get to know the last percent that actively tries to avoid it.

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago

Next step: allow only official services to be used. Introduce draconian legislation to persecute circumvention.

Fines with no legal recourse, debanking or complete banking bans, like EU has imposed on four people so far.

[–] Regenes@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (2 children)

"Let the government put a video camera in your bedroom to verify you aren't molesting kids. If you fight against this, that means you are molesting kids"

-use this argument anytime someone thinks this is about protecting kids.

[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I tried something similar with my brother-in-law. He is not against chat control in Europe (we live in Denmark), so I asked him to give me his phone, unlock it and let me play around with it without him in the same room. He refused, but still has "nothing to hide". He has not changed his mind...

[–] Mannimarco@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He trusts the government more than you apparently

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago

He is a certified idiot.

[–] wabafee@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

He should unlock his phone and give it to the police for a week.

[–] treesapx@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

And then do nothing when handed one of the biggest child sexual abuse cases ever.

[–] oddpixel@lemmy.wtf 23 points 1 week ago (3 children)
[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It doesn't have a paywall for me; sorry if it does for some people, I wouldn't have linked to it if I had known this, but leaving it up because it clearly doesn't for everyone.

[–] oddpixel@lemmy.wtf 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

No worries, it's probably doing that due to me never getting off my vpn.

[–] tomjuggler@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Just a tip: many"paywalled" sites actually load the content then obscure it with JavaScript - you can just click on the reading mode browser button to see the full article

[–] Luminous5481@anarchist.nexus 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

might I suggest a little bit of uBlock Origin?

[–] oddpixel@lemmy.wtf 3 points 1 week ago

Way ahead of ya. I think my vpns IP triggered it.

[–] letsgo2themall@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

paywalled. also, this is a good way to kill the internet. when everyone starts getting doxxed, all that will be left are the bots.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 9 points 1 week ago

Dead internet theory will be in full effect

[–] null@lemmy.org 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's irritating that normies eat up any legislation sold as "protecting kids." It's like it shuts off a part of the brain.

[–] shani66@ani.social 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The founding fathers didn't think everyone should vote, and frankly i think they're right. They had the wrong criteria, sure, but the average person is so gullible, uninformed, and just plain stupid that i genuinely think they (and everyone else) would be better off without a say.

But how to be more selective without it being abused by horrible people? I've got no real idea.

[–] DFX4509B@lemmy.wtf 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How soon before the Iron Firecurtain drops and the Fourth Reich blocks the entire internet and locks you into a state intranet like China and NK do?

[–] Quexotic@infosec.pub 5 points 1 week ago

<2y I think. Buy your radios now.

[–] turdburglar@piefed.social 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

marsha blackburn is a gential wart.

not one of the cute fuzzy ones either. nope, she’s one of the inflamed itchy ones that oozes puss and smells like a rotting potato.

i hope she falls in a hole and never finds her way out.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Griffus@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago

The land of dystopia just keeps on dystopying

[–] Quexotic@infosec.pub 4 points 1 week ago

Still speedrunning civil war, I see. I can't think of anyone that wants this...

load more comments
view more: next ›