this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2026
766 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

82414 readers
3352 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lyralycan@sh.itjust.works 136 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (17 children)

As much as I hate Reddit this is just continuation of the UK government steamrolling and destroying the free Internet, ruining the adult experience.

One of the wonders of the Internet was that it was wildly unregulated - if you wanted it and you could disable safesearch you could get it, with the caveat of ISP-enforced content locks on all mobile data subscriptions under the name of a legal child (under 18), workplace and school security and filters, unremovable Safesearch on most search engines etc. Broadband required an adult, who in turn could activate parental controls. I couldnt wait until I turned 18 so I could finally access many sites for porn, news, gaming, forums and anything containing keywords without being blocked. I had a list of proxies for bypassing school filters.

In short there is significant existing protection in place and we know that this is simply more evidence of Orwellian enforcement.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

So, the Cyberpolice were never real? 😯

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] abbiistabbii@piefed.blahaj.zone 70 points 1 week ago

Oh I'm sorry, which government demanded age checks which made kids give away their data to check their ages? Oh yeah.

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 50 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

/u/Spez (creator of /r/jailbait) should be in the car next to Andrew and on the gallows next to Trumpstein.

[–] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 29 points 1 week ago (12 children)

I'm not defending the guy but wasn't it that a mod of that subreddit added him as a mod as a joke? I don't think spez created it.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Zak@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (9 children)

It was created by Violentacrez, not spez.

Prior to late 2012, it was possible to make someone a moderator of a subreddit without their consent, which was sometimes done as a joke or harassment. That's why spez was briefly a moderator of r/jailbait.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ironically, Huffman doesn't seem to be in the Epstein files. This isn't because he isn't a pedophile-- he very likely is-- but he simply wasn't important enough of a person for them to invite him or even talk about him.

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 week ago

4chan had approximately 10x the users as reddit did in 2011 when Epstein and Poole connected.

But ya fuck u/spez. Even the biggest losers on earth hate u/spez

[–] FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

/u/Spez (creator of /r/jailbait)

oh 🫣 I've probably heard that before but I must not have committed it to memory

Well that explains why Reddit was so ridiculously pro-porn and porn-riddled in general.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 21 points 1 week ago

That's cos it's not true. He was a mod of it for a while, but I've not seen any verification of how long that was, and it was at a time when you could just add someone as a mod without them needing to approve it. But he was definitely not its founder.

He did allow it to stick around until the mainstream media started kicking up a fuss about it. That would be bad enough. We don't need to make shit up.

[–] SirMaple__@lemmy.ca 39 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Tja@programming.dev 4 points 1 week ago

Because of content. I still can't find woodworking, amarthome, soccer or F1 content or lemmy, just to name a few. I lurk in incognito mode on reddit for that, so the ads don't have any data about me.

[–] julysfire@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Cost of doing business to them. Make fines actually hurt and then maybe something will change.

[–] BennyTheExplorer@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Or just prosecute them criminally, like they do with the pesants

[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago
[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 week ago

Garbage fine by tyrannical government trying to police what you do online. Stop age verification!

[–] SleepyPie@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

A silly noble once said,

“If the penalty for a crime is a fine, then that law only exists for the lower class.”

Business criminals need to be barred from business, and criminal profits returned to the public.

[–] GreenTara@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Really waiting for the mass exodus from reddit. It seems like it's gotten pretty shitty over there the past year or so.

[–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

aswell as Youtube,Discord and Twitch

[–] nukeforyou@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

it kinda sucks tho that all my google searches for tech support I have to put site:reddit.com at the end because the rest of the web is shit for support

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You can thank walled gardens like Discord for that.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 week ago

software projects run by gamerz: hosted on discord

also software projects run by gamerz: why is the support channel the same 3 questions over and over again!?

idk, maybe it's that you host your software support on a platform without discoverability of solutions?

aT lEaSt It'S nOt A fOrUm

[–] mjr@infosec.pub 9 points 1 week ago

This seems like one of those cases where you wish both sides could lose. Reddit are up to no good, but lack of identity document demands isn't it.

[–] chaotic_ugly@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Spez is such a colossal Zuckerberg-wannabe piece of shit. I don't think any site has fallen farther than Reddit has. What a waste.

[–] Chais@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago
[–] devolution@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago
[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Fuck Reddit and Fuck Spez.

[–] vogi@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

The headline is a bit misleading is it not? There is no evidence of children's data being used unlawfully. (I mean there might I don't know what counts as "unlawful") This is just a fine for Reddit not to follow UKs dystopian ideas in time.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 1 week ago

They were relying on users to click I am definitely over 18. So there is by definition no possible way to know if children's data was being misused except to the extent it obviously was.

Age verification should have been a device side thing. I should be able to set up my kids phone / tablet with their date of birth and if they're not old enough then they can't access certain content. That way the only person who needs to verify the age of someone is me.

My ISP shipped with age restriction on by default, (personally I think that's a stupid default but that's a separate issue), but although annoying it was easy to get rid of because I'm the account holder. I didn't have to scan my ID though.

Anyway we all know this has been nothing to do with kids anyway.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] przemyslawowo@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago

I stopped. Kind got forced to but I’m happier for it lol

[–] db2@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The article says Reddit isn’t protecting the privacy of children while contradicting itself by saying it needs age verification for this…. in reality this leads to user profiling and data breaches.

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/02/discord-faces-backlash-over-age-checks-after-data-breach-exposed-70000-ids/

https://techlore.tech/the-free-speech-grift-how-politicians-tricked-you-into-demanding-surveillance/

[–] Devilz3@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They perma banned me :( bunch of power tripping people over there

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›