this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2024
653 points (99.7% liked)

196

19288 readers
53 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wh0_cares@lemmy.blahaj.zone 82 points 2 years ago

Gamers truly are the most oppressed class in society 😔

[–] BodilessGaze@sh.itjust.works 66 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That predates Shakespeare. Imagine if Shakespeare had written a play about gamer oppression.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Not violent enough for Shakespeare.

[–] umbraroze@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

But it would have been great for a Shakespearian minor joke character bit.

GUARD: "See, milord, how in this year's almanack the booba hath been veil'd, compared to last year's edition."

KING: "Greatly?"

GUARD: "Yes, greatly indeed! Two inches of cloth more!"

KING: "Thou art a nutter and I ought to throw thee in the madhouse."

GUARD: "But you wouldn't dare, sire? Tales of your treachery and oppression already circle widely."

KING: "Thou shouldst consider thee lucky that we have to get the Hell onward with our plot."

[–] Jayjader@jlai.lu 30 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

"dise-player, carder"
Ah, so this is probably some law trying to curb gambling-
"tenys player" wait, what? Were people betting on tennis matches back in the day or something?

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yeah. Even the king lost money betting on tennis.

Tennis was a spectator sport, which meant a great opportunity to show off your skills and to gamble! Both players and spectators could bet on the outcome, with the privy expenses showing that even the King could get it wrong. Between 1493 and 1499, Henry VII lost a total of £20

https://onthetudortrail.com/Blog/resources/life-in-tudor-england/tennis-in-tudor-times/

They kept trying to ban it in the city of London.

[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

What? They targeted gamers?!‽

[–] TootSweet@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

And that document was written by a time-traveling Anita Sarkeesian.

[–] Benjaben@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

All I'm getting from this is that something called "tenya" (?) is probably really fun. And now I'm annoyed I've never gotten to play!

E: oh maybe just "tens". Screw it, whatever it is, deal me in lol

[–] konalt@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Benjaben@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I'm assuming a dice game based around the number 10 most likely lol, but it is possible (and fun to imagine) that maybe rampant tennis enthusiasm needed to be quelled :) Weirder things have happened. Like a town dancing themselves to death.

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It was definitely tennis. Tennis had a lot of gambling involved. This was the time they were banning theaters too.

[–] Benjaben@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Well, I'll be!

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Maybe cause there was gambling involved too?

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

"Too"? It was ONLY because of gambling. To this day, the gambling industry cringetastically calls itself the "gaming industry"

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 2 years ago

Well it could also be cause the players were too noisy or rowdy, or some other (un)reason.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 years ago

My experience in becoming a gamer is to graduate from Parker Brothers family tabletop games to Steve Jackson wargames to Dungeons and Dragons which was declared Satanic by the moral guardians.

So yep.

Behind the Bastards recent two-parter on The Masculinity Crisis pointed out that the Gamergate controversy really was about gamers who found their only man space was gaming getting upset as the market opened up to women and other non-dude-bros. (I was quietly playing Gone Home at the time not understanding what the big deal was.) Then Steve Bannon whipped them into a voting bloc and got Trump elected (with a popular minority but the EC) and now we're all sorry.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

God I hope this is satire.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I just looked it up, the term “gamer” predates the term “satire” by about 50 years.

[–] dtrain@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

600 years and homie thinks it still stings.

[–] RangerJosie@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Gamers should be oppressed harder. Not quite with extreme prejudice. But almost. Use rubber bullets. Actual full rubber. Not those sneaky "Rubber Bullets" with steel cores.

[–] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

We should bring this back

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Just gotta be a liefull gamer.

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

ContraPoints has a great Tangent video about Gamergate (I think you have to be a Patreon subscriber to get access to it, but it's seriously like $2 or something).

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Innuendo Studio have the ultimate explanation of Gamergate.

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Innuendo Studio

I went looking for their video on gamergate and didn't find anything - do you have a link?