this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2026
66 points (80.6% liked)

Technology

81451 readers
4010 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 29 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Uhm, guys, the skin is not a plastic wrap but a organ; it absorbs substances. And while some can be bad for the skin (like, causing rash or cancer), some others can get into the blood stream this way. And some plastic softeners (of earpieces for example) are not allowed in most markets for this very reason.

Not about the article but about some of the comments here.

[–] oyzmo@piefed.social 43 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Clickbait! This is nothing news since the report isn't publicly available. This is just the media working to keep you scared and reading.

[–] xSikes@feddit.online 7 points 1 day ago

From my experience reading the guardian, click bait isn’t their thing. Also it says the investigation isn’t finished and they reached out for a comment , which usually means there’s room for an explanation or clarification if their findings are off. This is pretty common to openly ask “correct us if we’re wrong”.

Also it mentions the organization and European program backed by the EU.

https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/life/publicWebsite/project/LIFE22-GIE-HU-ToxFree-LIFE-for-All-101114078/awareness-raising-and-behaviour-change-program-to-empower-consumer-citizens-to-live-toxic-free-lives-reduce-chemical-risks-on-their-health-and-the-environment-and-to-upscale-their-positive-impact

No source linked by the article, no visible press releases that don't just pretend to be a real press release while citing the articles, no official blog posts, and the only official sounding mention of this that comes from a more direct source is a coalition on linkedin saying a person at a sub-group of the broader project was gonna talk with them about it.

No stats, no numbers, just "they found it" in the headphones.

You could find a chemical well under the safe limit in drinking water, and say "we found x in your water" and make a big scare of it when it's not a big deal.

While I have no doubt BPA and its counterparts could be used in manufacturing of headphones, without any actual data, this is literally no better than when your uncle at Thanksgiving starts yapping about how the government found some data one time and that means you should never drink tap water again.

[–] scoobford@piefed.blahaj.zone 22 points 1 day ago (3 children)

This seems like a nothing burger. Plenty of things you shouldn't ingest like BPA, plastic, and solder are perfectly benign when used to construct consumer electronics. 

I'd be more interested to hear they found something that leeches through the skin being used to create the body of the headphones.  

[–] thehatfox@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

BPAs have been shown to absorbed through the skin. Headphones are increasingly worn for long, continuous periods. Unlike other plastic objects which are handled for shorter periods.

I’m not entirely convinced of the danger myself (tinnitus seems a bigger worry for headphone use to me), but I thought it was a matter worthy of further discussion.

[–] xep@discuss.online 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Like the condoms?

TIL: You can still buy them, even Trojan sells them wtf.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world -4 points 1 day ago

Do they make condoms from Israeli circumcised foreskin?

[–] vext01@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I did wonder this myself. Can it enter the body via normal usage? And if so, in what dose? Enough for us to care?

I don't make a habit of putting headphones in my mouth, but young children do things like that.

[–] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 3 points 1 day ago

Wait.. What do you mean with shouldn't injest.. I thought it was perfectly fine: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michel_Lotito

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 4 points 22 hours ago

Wearing any brand of headphones, even for as little as two minutes, was shown to change the subjects' engrams on a well-calibrated E-meter.

[–] Willoughby@piefed.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

we can't eat headphones anymore?

[–] vext01@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 1 day ago

Only Beets by Dr Dre.

[–] vext01@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Is there a way to find out which models are guilty?

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No, you just have to have the anxiety of which toxic chemicals you are in contact with every time you use your headphones. You're welcome.

[–] vext01@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 day ago

Everything is toxic at some dose.

[–] hummingbird@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

According to the article all of them.

[–] vext01@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 1 day ago

All that we're sampled. So which were sampled?

They mentioned some brands, but not models.

[–] Flying_Penguin@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

Is it muddy bananas?

feminisation of males

Looks closely

The guardian

Well that's all I need to know about this.

[–] johsny@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago

Who is chewing on their headphones?