this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2026
23 points (100.0% liked)

Portland

595 readers
26 users here now

Welcome to the lemmy.world community for Portland, Oregon!

This community has kind of been empty since it was created, I'm hoping to change that!

Unlike "other" Portland communities you may have seen "elsewhere", I believe in a "warts and all" approach. You are free to take off your Rose tinted glasses and talk about topics that are dragging our city down.

At the same time, sunset pics, snowmageddon, traffic monster, cones, that's all welcome as well. Let's collectively keep Portland weird!

2024 is going to be an interesting year politically with all the changes to city government, I will attempt to tag political threads with a [Politics] tag and encourage users to do so as well.

Other than the lemmy.world restrictions on spam, copyrighted material, and adult material (USE that NSFW tag!), there's only one real way to get in trouble here:

  1. Don't attack other users.

It's OK to go after Teargas Ted, it's OK to say Rene Gonzales is a fascist, ACAB, BLM, whatever floats your boat (WEFYB).

It's NOT OK to attack or diminish another user. Feel free to disagree, you can point out the many ways you think they're wrong, just don't start throwing perjoratives AT OTHER USERS.

Links to know!

Portland Trailblazers Schedule!

https://www.nba.com/blazers/schedule

Portland Winterhawks Home Game Schedule!

https://www.rosequarter.com/events/winterhawks

Portland Timbers Pre-Season Starts in February!

https://www.timbers.com/schedule/matches#competition=all&amp%3Bdate=2024-02-10

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 4 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I do not understand why so many places make themselves target examples for the right, by being unlivable for working class people on one income stream.

One of the most sane and often repeated arguments regarding liberal ideology is that you can’t afford to live in it. Then, Seattle, Portland, and California are pointed to. It’s a fair take. I read a real estate article re homes across states, “affordable” pockets vs not. WA state, for example, has seen an 888% home price increase across the last decade, higher than any other state, including Hawaii and California.

Why? Why is it always blue?

Meanwhile, Minnesota is steadfastly blue, even through the Reagan years, and is affordable.

Again. Why?

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Why is it always blue?

Because overseas real estate investors don't want to lose money, so they invest in places of value. They're certainly not investing in bumblefuck Alabama.

Capitalism sucks the life out of nice things.

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 2 points 2 days ago

My point is, MN is somehow making it work. Why just MN?

[–] stephen@lemmy.today 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Agreed. In many of the bluest places there seems to be a lot of NIMBY-ism. So, while it used to be an affordable place to live, the older folks that bought their homes decades ago don’t want their home prices to go down. This seems to make things like re-zoning for multi-family (or denser) housing, restricting car parking, etc. much harder than it should be.

It feels short-sighted because living in a dense, walkable city is a really great experience, and it’s the only thing I miss about the East Coast. Everything else there I’m glad to be away from.

I’ll admit to not having seen the lion’s share of Portland’s neighborhoods, but the most walkable ones seem to be closer to the river. However, there’s no reason this can’t spread from there if we actually allow it too. Neighborhood bars, walking distance to a grocery store, more parks, MORE SIDEWALKS, etc.

Also, Minnesota is amazing.

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I would posit that the HOA structure of new housing effectively undermines any sensical structuring involved in incorporating a new neighborhood of anything into a larger city space.

[–] stephen@lemmy.today 1 points 2 days ago

That’s a good point. I’m lucky enough that I don’t live within an HOA, but I’m sure many of my neighbors would raise a stink if someone tried to build a duplex on one of the lots.

The bigger issue around me is actually real estate investors buying the houses to use as rentals. It means people don’t stay at the house long term, and it can change the dynamics of the neighborhood. I don’t have a solution to this specific problem, but I’d love something that skewed outcomes to be more financially beneficial to people buying a house to live in.

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Minnesota ... is affordable

Is it? Rent costs in Portland and Minneapolis look almost identical.

In either case it's because cities are hot real estate markets and capitalism erodes social policies that stand in the way of market access. Doesn't have much to do with red vs blue.