this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2026
229 points (99.1% liked)

Europe

825 readers
248 users here now

Europe community on dbzer0. Intended to be a place to discuss European news, politics, or just general topics from a European perspective. Since this is on dbzer0 expect the community to lean more leftist-anarchist but a wide range of views are accepted here (within reason).

Rules:

1. No Bigotry or Hate SpeechAny forms of Homophobia, Transphobia, Queerphobia, Racism, or Ableism will be met with swift and harsh action and will not be tolerated here whatsoever. Bigots will be banned immediately on-sight. This includes apologia of it. Trying to be politely or intellectually bigoted i.e. "Just asking questions" won't be tolerated.

2. No ZionismAny forms of Zionism or Zionist rhetoric will not be tolerated here, this includes Zionist apologia, accusations of antisemitism towards anti-Zionists, or blatant denial or downplaying of the genocide towards Palestinians. Any attempt to uphold or prop up the IHRA definition of antisemitism, will be treated as Zionism. Anyone engaging in Pro-Zionist sentiment or apologia will be actioned in accordance with its severity.

Note: Trying to find loopholes or whataboutery to see what is or isn't genocide denial or Zionism will be treated as a violation of this rule. Don't test us.

3. Stay CivilPlease maintain civil discourse in the community. Do not engage in arguments with others, name-calling, or insults. Note that calling out bigotry or Zionism is not considered an insult. In heated arguments users are encouraged to or even required to disengage failure to do so will result in mod action.

4. No MisinformationSpreading of misinformation intentionally in this community is unacceptable and will not be tolerated. Spreading misinformation hurts the credibility of the community and can mislead people sometimes in dangerous ways. Users who intentionally post misinformation as articles, comment answers, or in attempt to win arguments will be actioned swiftly.

Note: This includes Russian and Chinese propaganda. Users with a history of such posting will be banned on sight.

5. No AI ContentPlease do not post articles or content primarily created using generative AI. Generative AI content may contain misinformation or be lower quality and thus is discouraged. Posts and comments featuring it will be removed. However this community does not allow or tolerate Anti-AI trolling or hostility and users who engage in such behavior will be actioned for it, additionally Anti-AI trolling violates Rule 3 and often Rule 4 so it is generally unacceptable already.


Note: Rules 1 & 2 may be subject to preemptive mod action due to their severity, and they apply to a user's entire post history. Not just this community.

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Lena Schilling used the Vienna Opera Ball to condemn Austria’s mega wealthy, and call for a return to a ‘fair’ inheritance tax model.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Tax them, beat them, put them in a stew.

[–] sik0fewl@piefed.ca 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Give it to us raw and wriggling.

[–] Chakravanti@monero.town 2 points 23 hours ago

And lets salt some jerking jerky jerk.

[–] Vesiiiii@nord.pub 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I am not for inheritance tax at all, But normal progressive taxation that would ”hit” the rich. As a child, it is fair, in my opinion at least, to get What your family has worked for, But if you get radiculusly rich, then it should be taxed when the money is made and not when you are dead.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 4 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Usually inheritance tax is only for people who are quite wealthy. Most places the average person passes down what they own without any significant tax. It's only when you control well more wealth than you actually earned (the ultra wealthy did not get their wealth through their labor) where there's any significant taxation. I don't know why you'd be against this, except for the "temporarily displaced billionaire" mentality. It is a way to redistribute unearned wealth, and attempting to make who you're born to not the determination for success, and that's a good thing.

[–] stormdelay@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

If I may ask, why are you against taxing inheritance? It's not like the kids earned any of these assets

[–] Vesiiiii@nord.pub 2 points 1 day ago

Well, I am against inheritance tax, because I believe that what was my father will be mine and what is mine will be my children’s is a fair rule. I care about every Person, at least I try to, But I do care more, naturally, about my family. This is Why I believe it is fair to give me wealth and belongings fully to me children.

If you expected another argument, maybe more logical or mathematical, Sorry to disappoint you. Sometimes people just believe in stuff or think in some way for no reason - this is simply my feeling of ”fair”. Though, of course, you have the right to your opinion!

[–] Janx@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

If I was ultra-rich, I would statistically have entire wealth management firms finding every loophole possible to avoid contributing my fair share to society. An inheritance tax is me paying my taxes "over my dead body". I'm gone. Why the fuck should it matter!?

[–] velxundussa@sh.itjust.works 2 points 23 hours ago

In that scenario, chances are your grandparents, parents and extended family is also rich.

It's more about wanting their money to end up in your pockets when they die.

[–] ChristerMLB@piefed.social 0 points 1 day ago

True, but you could also band together with the other rich people and lobby for the inheritance tax to be abolished for a few years so you can give your children the inheritance before the tax gets reintroduced. A wealth tax doesn't have that problem.

[–] Vesiiiii@nord.pub 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Also, when now I am thinking about it, inheritance tax is not fair in a way that it is a double taxation - first your parents (e.g.) pay taxes from their wages, buy/own stuff Based on that and then you tax those things again when being inherited. to me, there is little to no Sense in that.

what I wish for, what I would like to see, is not as many taxes as possible, But, rather, as few of them But done Well and fairly so that they are just - in my opinion should be progressive - and easy to understand for normal people without agencies as Well.

[–] inlandempire@jlai.lu 10 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm nitpicking but you pay taxes multiple times in general, eg:

  • you pay taxes on income/wage
  • vat when you spend it
  • shop pays taxes on profit
  • the employee pays income tax again

Inheritance tax monitors the transfer of wealth rather than the original earning of it, the goal is to prevent accumulation of wealth, and birth becoming the main determining factor for chances in society. Usually it's progressively applied, with tax free thresholds, so the common people often aren't even subject to such tax.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Well put! The „taxed twice!!11“ argument is something inheritance tax opponents in particular love to shout without another thought. This logic would apply to most taxes because it‘s an illogical argument. It‘s second only to „A death tax??? And we pretend this is normal??? Will taxes never end???“ 🙄

[–] Grainne@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Don't copy American liberals.

[–] Enkrod@feddit.org 0 points 10 hours ago

Why not copy a good idea? AOC would surely be in favour of even more "tax the rich" dresses.