Kind of sad. Teens have a higher rate of suicide because of the evil algorithms of social media and we as a society do basically nothing about it. I'm readings news about it since years and absolutely nothing changes. Why are we not forbiddening it? How much worse can it get??
this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2026
108 points (93.5% liked)
World News
53600 readers
2448 users here now
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Why would we stop it? Despair is great for conditioning the next generation of ~~slaves~~ workers to accept abuse.
Algos have us all doom-scrolling.
When 9-11 happened the Fukushima I couldn't tear myself away from the footage. Ended up being the same in Reddit with live updates, would have been the same with Tiktok I suppose but I never engaged on that.
I moved Youtube back to clients that only gave me who i follow, moved to lemmy/piefed.
I just want enough news to know what's happening. I don't need every gory detail or every opinion piece on it.
I even split on bluesky, wasn't healthy.
Fediverse is just about as healthy as I can find.
Aaaand now 50 more countries are in the process of mandating age verification…
I swear, virtually every government is full of enough schmucks that the experts warning about what WILL happen due to age verification never get their voices heard in the sea of “no no, it will protect the kids, you see.”
And the fact that so many nation states are choosing authoritarian measures to theoretically, in some timeline, improve the mental health of kids and teens, instead of regulating algorithms and other manipulative measures (which would be a real step to help), really shows the character of these governments, no matter how responsible they are, no matter how corrupt they are, no matter how popular their politicians are within these nations.
100% agree
Social media is? not the world they live in that they get to see on social media? I don't understand this take for that reason. There are legitimate reasons why someone would feel doom and gloom by looking into whats happening in the world.
(editor’s note: they are designed to capture users’ attention and monetise it, and they come in several forms which aren’t necessarily limited to social media. Some are also used by online shopping sites, for example).
The Problem Is NOT Social Media, Please Stop Feeding The Moral Panic
I am not saying you are wrong. But you need to show us unbiased research that contradict the research that does show a link.
Heck even meta's own research (as biased as it gets) show a significant link.
https://www.cnbc.com/2025/11/23/meta-internal-research-social-media-harm-court-filing.html
https://www.anxiousgeneration.com/research/the-evidence
When examining the reviews, it becomes evident that the research field is dominated by cross-sectional work that is generally of a low quality standard. While research has highlighted the importance of differentiating between different types of digital technology use many studies do not consider such necessary nuances. These limitations aside, the association between digital technology use, or social media use in particular, and psychological well-being is—on average—negative but very small. Furthermore, the direction of the link between digital technology use and well-being is still unclear: effects have been found to exist in both directions and there has been little work done to rule out potential confounders.
Social media bans and severe restrictions are a rigid, ineffective response to evolving issues that warrant continuous evaluation. Social media bans inhibit adolescent psychosocial needs by keeping adolescents from a source of meaningful connection without offering a valuable alternative. Strict social media restrictions and bans for adolescents have resulted in several negative consequences, such as instilling feelings of isolation, fostering rebellion against authority, and contributing to underdeveloped digital literacy skills [10].
Additionally, legislators have been attempting to impose time restrictions on social media use for minors [11,12] but have faced challenges in passing such regulations due to constitutional concerns. Even if implemented, these time restrictions do not address the quality of adolescents’ social media interactions and other contextual factors, which are critical for evaluating their impact on mental health.
https://mental.jmir.org/2024/1/e64626
While there are considerable concerns regarding the negative impacts of social media on adolescents, it also serves as a vital resource for adolescents and young adults. Much of the current research conducted on social media use has relied on focus groups and qualitative interviews, which can be vulnerable to reporting bias. Observational studies and objective tracking of social media may be needed to better understand social media use. Research has shown that social media engagement varies by race, gender, and other social factors, and future studies should explore how these demographic differences impact the positive outcomes associated with social media. Overall, social media can be an important tool for adolescents to find social connection, seek social support, and gain access to health information. Physicians can adopt a nuanced approach to addressing adolescent social media use.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12356748/
Unfortunately, given the cross-sectional nature of most studies, it remains unclear whether social media use affects identity development in adolescence, whether the adolescent identity development process influences social media use, or whether these associations are perhaps bidirectional. Consequently, there is a need for well-designed longitudinal studies to capture the temporal direction of this relationship. Lastly, measuring only the time spent on social media limits the understanding of the relationship between social media engagement and identity development. Future research should focus on adolescents’ activities, interactions, and the content they engage with on social media to provide a more complete picture of this relationship.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12084248/
Social media and technological advancements’ impact on adolescent mental health is complex. It can be both a risk factor and a valuable support system.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12165459/
This review has highlighted how social media use can contribute to poor mental health – through validation-seeking practices, fear of judgement, body comparison, addiction and cyberbullying. It also demonstrates social media’s positive impact on adolescent wellbeing - through connection, support and discussion forums for those with similar diagnoses. Future research should consider adolescent views on improvements to social media, studying younger participants, and the impact of COVID-19 on social media use and its associated mental health implications.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/13591045221092884
Thank you. Lots of different views. Will read. There was also recently an talk on hard fork on this issue. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tZSteN2g5yM
My personal opinion is that things that let you curate your own content like lemmy/reddit is good(ish) and things where the company curate the feed is more a trap. But i am not a scientist, just curious.