this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2026
749 points (99.0% liked)

politics

28778 readers
2670 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sen. Bernie Sanders also demanded “fundamental reforms” to Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Customs and Border Protection, saying they are “terrorizing” US communities.

US Sen. Bernie Sanders on Wednesday demanded the removal of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller—a key architect of Donald Trump’s violent mass deportation campaign—as well as concrete reforms in exchange for any new funding for Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

In remarks on the Senate floor, Sanders (I-Vt.) called ICE a “domestic military force” that is “terrorizing” communities across the country. The senator pointed specifically to the agency’s ongoing activities in Minnesota and Maine, where officers have committed horrific—and deadly—abuses.

Sanders said that “not another penny should be given” to ICE or Customs and Border Protection (CBP) “unless there are fundamental reforms in how those agencies function—and until there is new leadership at the Department of Homeland Security and among those who run our immigration policy.” The senator has proposed repealing a $75 billion ICE funding boost that the GOP approved last summer, an end to warrantless arrests, the unmasking of ICE and CBP agents, and more.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nebraska_Huskers@lemmy.world 156 points 1 month ago (42 children)

Damn it Bernie, if only the Democrats hadn't sabotaged your campaign for Hillary. Where would we be today? Certainly not this hellscape. People would have forgotten Trump was even a presidential canidate by now. I'm so angry at what could have been

[–] happydoors@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I agree. The Clinton’s had some heavy baggage and a straight old white dude would’ve been interesting! Idk if he would’ve won but simply having his platform endorsed would’ve changed history. He was just as angry as Trump was. If only Harambe didn’t die.

[–] limelight79@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I've seen people claim that they were going to vote Bernie until Clinton won the nomination, then they switched to Trump.

My mind boggles at the sheer insanity of that change, but I guess they wanted someone "different." They didn't seem to care what "different" meant.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

20 years of AM radio fucked some people up.

[–] notwhoyouthink@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

More like almost 100 years. Learned that on the It Could Happen Here podcast. Very good and stark background of how talk radio has been dividing this country since the 1930s, using religion as its Trojan horse.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Nebraska_Huskers@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

But with Bernie you knew where he stood, you knew what he was pissed about and what systems he wanted to dismantle. The rich Dems of the east Coast south and west coast couldn't handle that.

It was literally the Midwest and iron belt that supported him and pacific nw that supported him

Trump was going to destroy everything for his own benefit not for the betterment of the general public.

Nebraska is a red state, I knew more people excited about Bernie than Trump, I threw a tantrum when Hillary got the nod and was told by better off people I knew in far bigger cities and with more money that Hillary was the safe bet. Still to this day same people so excited for Gavin Newsom, they post their hatred everyday about Trump but they aren't willing to vote for anyone who will put up a fight with the fip. Gavin isn't it

load more comments (41 replies)
[–] blattrules@lemmy.world 71 points 1 month ago

And then also no more money for ICE after that.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 41 points 1 month ago (6 children)

God fucking damn it it's always the same shit.

Republicans push some absolute bullshit to 10.

Democrats: We need to be reasonable and go back to 6!


Where is the party that says we need to go back to zero bullshit!

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Been saying it for a long time now, we gotta primary every last DNC member holding a seat. They're all either complicit or neutered to the point of uselessness.

I love Bernie but this obviously isn't his fight. He's been about economics for like, 400 years, and just economics and it's fine, but he's not going to lead us out of fascism. He needs to go rest and enjoy retirement.

The DNC is a container full of rotten old money and establishment-preserving collaborators with the GOP. We pour the container out, freshen it up with some new contents.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tilgare@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

I agree - but also, if anyone in congress deserves the benefit of the doubt, I'd say it's Sanders. I think the first major step back off this ledge is probably restoring the status quo. If we started on the exact best path forward tomorrow, I'm not sure it would START with abolishing ICE. It would start by utterly neutering them first, then dismantling them after eliminating their internal ability to resist, because we both know it'll be a loud and painful process no matter what.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 month ago (2 children)

So the issue is not ICE, but who's managing ICE.

That's basically same as saying that the nazis were just following orders.

The issues, Bernie, are both who's managing ICE and ICE itself. ICE are terrorists, you can't just say that you will give money to ICE if they remove those two assholes ignoring all the shit each ICE agent has done so far, Bernie.

[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 34 points 1 month ago

I think you missed the part where he wants drastic reform within the agency on top of axing the ghouls running it. He's much more likely to succeed politically with those types of demands than just straight up defunding the entire thing.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

So the issue is not ICE, but who’s managing ICE.

You can say that about any organization. If the Nazis had been run by Rosa Luxemberg, they wouldn't be the Nazis. They'd be a totally different thing.

But we've been staffing ICE with ice chewing psychos for decades. I don't believe a reformist bureaucrat can lead ICE. The organization's rank-and-file would rebel, in the same way the CIA rebelled under Kennedy and the FBI rebelled under Obama.

The issues, Bernie, are both who’s managing ICE and ICE itself. ICE are terrorists, you can’t just say that you will give money to ICE if they remove those two assholes ignoring all the shit each ICE agent has done so far, Bernie.

Even the most left-wing Democrats are still convinced that an organization dedicated to terrorizing migrant workers and extra-judicially deporting Enemies of the State is too popular to dismantle. That's a bleak prospect for the nation's future.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 22 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

IMO, immigration control in general is stupid. IDC where you're from or how you come to live here. Just pay the taxes to contribute to the community and those in need. Enforce it through the IRS like any other citizen. Abolish ICE entirely.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] radiouser@crazypeople.online 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] alt_xa_23@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

Not another penny for ICE ~~until Kristi Noem, Stephen Miller are gone~~

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

You could have stopped that sentence earlier and had more of my support

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (5 children)

They'll just put someone else equally terrible in. No funding for ice until Trump and the GOP are goneffs.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 month ago (4 children)

How about just abolishing ICE?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] limelight79@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah. Getting rid of Noem would be great, but she's just doing what Trump wants. She's a symptom, not the disease.

And I suspect Miller would still have Trump's ear even if he wasn't officially employed by the US government.

The whole regime has to go.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 4 points 1 month ago

ICE doesn't need funding at all because it doesn't need to exist.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

I'm so sick of dems. Fuck you. Not another penny ever.

[–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 7 points 1 month ago

Sanders is an independent

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

While it is cathartic to think taking these people out of their position is punishing them, the reality is they will be replaced with another Nazi.

If Trump had been assassinated it would not have stopped this. If Hitler had been assassinated the Nazi would have fought on. This situation is no different.

It is a sobering and necessary realization that this whole administration isn't a one-off. This is a part of who we are.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Bernie says the right things, but people only see this:

The billionaire owned media WANT people to only see that

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

He's in the minority of the minority. Chuck Schumer will be out an hour later saying he's ready to sign off on ICE funding in exchange for a kick back and a high five.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

That is setting the bar far too low. It’s buried, Bernie. You buried the fucking bar.

[–] Pistcow@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

"Not on my watch"- Chuck Schumer

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

How about never.

Shitty president = more sadistic tools put in their place. It’s not going to get better.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The only non pos senator.

Name one other, go ahead, we can look at them handing rifles to settlers in israel at a minimum, looking at you oregon.

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

I wish he was like 20 years younger so you could expect him to be around longer

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago

There also has to be prosecutions and consequences for the murders.

[–] barnaclebutt@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Hopefully some pissant with his glasses at the end of his nose will listen.

load more comments
view more: next ›