this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2026
52 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

3568 readers
363 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] aarch0x40@piefed.social 17 points 4 days ago

Hopefully this doesn’t lead to a redefinition of what “end-to-end encryption” means

[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 12 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Encrypted from your phone to Meta, then from Meta to your contacts!

[–] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 12 points 4 days ago

Whoa! That's end-to-end, times two! Twice as secure! /s

[–] BlueKey@fedia.io 6 points 4 days ago

Not really, they use a derivate of Signals protocol. But this doesn't stop them from making their closed source clients to forward the securely received messages to them. An idea which comes to mind would be the "link device" feature: they invoke it to link their internal client to your phone and the apps hides it from the device list.

[–] skeezix@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

if you have anything to do with facebook or meta then you can only blame yourself.

Human are usually social. Social pressure and ignorance of other can stronger than own will.

[–] Ludicrous0251@piefed.zip 6 points 4 days ago

The lawsuit does not provide any technical details to back up the rather sensational claims.

I don't trust Meta and will never use their products, but this lawsuit isn't exactly brimming with confidence. Will be curious to see what if anything comes from it.

[–] KissYagni@programming.dev 6 points 4 days ago

You mean that a company whose business rely on collecting user data actually collect user data ?

[–] earlstilt@feddit.uk 3 points 4 days ago

WHAT!!! You’re telling me that meta’s motivation for providing the world’s biggest messaging app for free is not entirely altruistic? I am shocked