Just sounds like somebody who isn't good at their job. "Not committing to answers" isn't the role, the opposite is true.
And why is this article so antagonistic? The takeaway is…what, exactly? It's obvious to anyone who's been paying attention for the last few years that most companies working in tech desperately need UX—good, caring, talented people working in UX who are given real decision-making power. Otherwise the people making decisions are user-hostile FOMO VPs and C-suite types, and they're making a damn mess everywhere.
The answer to bad UX designers isn't no UX designers, it's better UX designers. And give them some damn power already!