this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2026
112 points (99.1% liked)

Fuck Cars

14297 readers
182 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] grue@lemmy.world 36 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Oh the Urbanity! has a great video about this, explaining why it isn't equivalent because induced demand is a good thing for transit even while it's a bad thing for driving.

https://urbanists.video/w/pR25CxtjRpRG7hMhbeVcxP

(Side note: it took me way too long to look up the peertube version of the video instead of the YouTube one, because I couldn't remember the instance name and PeerTube instances aren't nearly as discoverable as they ought to be.)

[–] veganpizza69@lemmy.vg 1 points 1 day ago

"build it and they will come" ?

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, the goal should be to induce demand to higher throughput and lower total cost/additional user options

[–] grue@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

Not to mention, transportation modes whose externalities are positive instead of negative. IMO that's the aspect that is both most important and most neglected from consideration.

[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 24 points 3 days ago

Hold on, you’re saying that if there are bike lanes that make riding safe, more people will ride bikes? Sounds sus but okay.

[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Watch car brains use this as a study against bike lanes and sidewalks, arguing about induced demand.

[–] hilljack26301@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

On the other site there is a carbrain that argues against commuter trains because he claims they induce demand and fill up, rendering them useless.