this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2026
457 points (100.0% liked)

Memes of Production

387 readers
1160 users here now

Seize the Memes of Production

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the “ML” influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great Communities:

founded 1 week ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 11 hours ago

If you look past which political orientation they are supporting, I would say in terms of life trajectory it seems to support astrology.

[–] ThunderQueen@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

George Floyd and Charlie Kirk also had the same bday

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 47 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I think the zodiac system being what it is completely destroys the zodiac "system"

[–] marduk@lemmy.sdf.org 25 points 5 days ago (1 children)

But was Uranus in retrograde on both days? Checkmate atheist

[–] TaterTot@piefed.social 9 points 5 days ago

How did you know!?

Oh wait... that was Gatorade... my mistake.

[–] a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (4 children)

The person who downvoted you was definitely like "Ugh, must be a jiminy" or something.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] tacosanonymous@mander.xyz 41 points 5 days ago (2 children)

If you ask people who really believe that, they’ll just point out the added nuances based on time/location of birth, moons, ascending, descending etc.

[–] BedbugCutlefish@lemmy.world 21 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Yeah, I don't think astrology is any more real than, say, tarot cards. But both are complicated enough systems to be fun to play with, and also too complicated to simply 'disprove' like this post is trying to do.

Lotsa people think Astrology is just those sign things printed in newspapers (and, this does include some people who believe in it)

[–] GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world 19 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Trust me. It's been disproven. Scientifically. By multiple studies. If you ask me nice I will find you the links.

[–] Juice@midwest.social 11 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

Using a scientific study to disprove human experience is completely missing the point. It’s the same urge to say that, “Love is just a bunch of chemicals.” What exactly are you trying to achieve, when insisting to other people that the reality or unreality of their experience depends on whether they compare those experiences to scientific studies that 1. Were not written for them and 2. Wasn’t written by/for you?

Sometimes people act as though they are better able to ascertain truth in every domain because they have a purely scientific and objective view of cosmology. Yet often, people who have a more scientific view will also sit in mysterious wonder about their place in the cosmos. “I’m so small and insignificant,” or sometimes, "nothing I ever do will matter, because of entropy and time scales measured in eons rather than years. But that feeling can also carry with it a feeling of wonder and awe, it can feel peaceful and part of something unfathomably larger than ourselves. That feeling however, and what it means to us is unaccounted for in scientific experimentation. Does that make the feeling illegitimate? What if I have an urge to try and explain the sense of wonder to myself in a way that was not bounded by science.

Have you ever wondered whether or not a practical method for uncovering truth about our natural world, may not be the absolute measure of all phenomena? And that asserting of one ontology as absolute over others is the literal definition of hegemony?

I know you aren't trying to oppress anyone but the negative reaction to a pretty harmless observation comes off to me as superstitious.

[–] a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Have you ever wondered whether or not a practical method for uncovering truth about our natural world, may not be the absolute measure of all phenomena?

If something is good at making predictions, then science can and will confirm it.

No one can stop you from holding superstitions, but that doesn't make them useful in any way.

[–] Juice@midwest.social 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Is there anything in your life that has a use, that is not useful for making predictions?

[–] a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Lots of things. My toaster for instance. I eat a lot of toasted bread.

But it isn't useful beyond roasting bread.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

You absolutely have a right to your religion.

[–] yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I cannot respond to everything but this point strikes me:

pretty harmless observation

In a vacuum, yes, these are harmless observation. When you look at the broader picture though, you will find strong connections to rejecting all of science and to the far right.

Anytime someone mentions astrology (at least online, I do not know anyone who believes in it IRL) it is just a matter of time until they talk about the COVID vaccine and a supposed "New World Order" by the IWF, Jews and whatnot.

At least that's the case in Germany. You can read a bit more here, you may want to use machine translation. Article published by the Federal Agency for Civic Education.

https://www.bpb.de/themen/rechtsextremismus/dossier-rechtsextremismus/550441/rechtsextreme-esoterik/

[–] Juice@midwest.social 2 points 3 days ago

I really think your "broader picture" is context specific. In the US, right wingers go to church and mostly hate astrology. Ive never met a vaguely right wing practitioner of mysticism. Most people I meet who are into astrology are women, lgbtq+, and minorities, people who are more likely to have their opinions silenced by white men questioning their logic and reason. One of the most popular astrologers right now is Chani Nicholas, who is left wing, and discusses social justice and organizing in her content. Our mystics often call themselves "witches" and can be persecuted for their beliefs by our most prominent persecutors, the christian right. We have periodic "satanic panics" that lead to the arrest of queer people and minorities, who are imprisoned for decades in some cases, while the actual satanists never get caught.

There is objectively a fascism problem everywhere. To criticize astrology as if academic science doesnt have such a problem, is just a different flavor of gullibility. But I admit, the first time I ever met a like a hardcore white supremacist neo-nazi, although i didn't know it at the time, we got high and he told me all about gnostic mysticism. It took me years to untangle the horrible logic that underpinned the spirituality he was peddling. But that Nazi was so nice and cool. Not once did he take one of my ideas and try to invalidate them. When in mentioned I liked jazz he put on (all white but very good) Mahavishnu Orchestra. We discussed philosophy and metaphysics, and he tried to plant little seeds that, if believed, could absolutely lead to belief in far right extremist ideas, similar to some of the descriptions in the article you shared, like the creation of a new authority, etc.,

But I think if people with liberal or left sensibilities took the effort to really try to connect with people, rather than hegemonically eradicate competing ontologies, then maybe the fash wouldnt be able to gain purchase in these communities. The principal error of idealism is that ideas create society, and to some extent it is true, however ideas are created by society. If educated people are going to shun and humiliate someone who sees a mystic or looks up star charts, then the politics, my friend, will be determined by the social forces that are active in those communities.

I am a materialist, but I also dont believe that spirituality and materialism are totally at odds. The history of why they are at odds is very interesting, and socioeconomic, rather than purely philosophical. Isaac Newton was a mystic, Hegel studied mysticism to formulate his dialectics. I know scientists who are deeply religious and I know people who grew up studying Wicca and then became rational, methodical scientists.

So on the one hand there may be some cultural difference, but also judging the way the German government has treated pro-palestine protesters, There seems to be more political willingness to force people to adhere to certain beliefs. I'm not sure how much the history of Nazi esotericism is in effect in your country, I bet it cuts a lot of different ways.

The fash are winning the culture war, by engaging with culture. Meanwhile liberals, who dont really know why they believe what they believe, continue to ridicule others for their beliefs, because once upon a time rich landlords and the emergent capitalist class wanted to take land away from the church, and they did it by supporting kinds of scientific inquiry that would discredit the church. Granted the history of the church vs scientific inquiry up to that point was pretty terrifying, but these things have a way coming back around. You know, first as tragedy, again as farce.

The emergent right isnt the fault of mysticism and superstition, it is a protracted campaign carried out by our ruling classes and kept alive by extractive social relations. The more divided we are against ourselves, the more ground they gain. Instead of thinking of beliefs as personal failings, think of them as social movements made up of people.

I'm not a mystic but I will fight for witches, especially against smug objectivists. Not saying that you come off as smug, but there is no shortage of smugness among the scientific rational atheist contingent

[–] BedbugCutlefish@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

Yes, I know. Not my point; my point is that you can't disprove it with a cheap gotcha, not that it's real. I say I don't think its real in my post.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dharmacurious@slrpnk.net 13 points 5 days ago

Same. I do not believe in astrology, and don't want people to think I do. Lol.

But to the astrology people, like my best friend, those two being born on the same day doesn't disprove anything, it strengthens it. They're both born on the same day, they're both globally recognizable figures, they have strong, divisive opinions, they are both at least somewhat charismatic, and they both lead huge movements (or, at least, are figureheads with staunch supporters and followers of their own). The details of them having polar opposite opinions and ethics is immaterial to "what the stars have destined for them!" Or whatever the fuck

[–] a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

and also too complicated to simply 'disprove' like this post is trying to do.

It has to make correct predictions. It doesn't.

There is nothing to disprove.

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 3 points 4 days ago

It does because it’s vague. Imo.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 8 points 5 days ago

Well yeah that's literally what they believe. A better argument is identical twins that turn out extremely differently.

I mean, I think a better argument would be most folks interested in astrology use tropical astrology and not sidereal so the places they're saying the sun and planets are when folks are born in relation to the stars are actually extremely off.

All that said most folks into astrology are pretty casual about it and don't think much about it. Yes, obviously there are still quite a few people who do believe it hard core to the extent of effectively discrimination based on people's month of birth but they're still the minority of folks who do astrology things.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Me and Georgia O'Keeffe. I can't get pussy to save my life.

[–] Nastybutler@lemmy.world 20 points 5 days ago

It's easy to explain. They're Yin and Yang. Two halves of a whole

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Both are heavily influenced by fascists.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 11 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Greta is not influenced by fascists, the fuck?

[–] FapMaster69@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

To be fair, to anybody radicalized generally, are we not influenced by fascists??? Influenced to oppose if that's not obvious.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Are you sure about that? Maybe look into the goals of some the people she supports.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

She spent time in an Israeli prison being abused by the IDF for illegally trying to enter Gaza. That tells me more about her than any group you might be concerned about her supporting.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They're both young people that were "radicalized" (made stupid) by groups with evil goals. They both willingly put themselves into danger because of that "radicalization". They're both useful idiots used by terrible people for propaganda purposes.

You're putting a lot of stock into them being used by different hate groups. But lately those hate groups have been merging.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And who in your mind are these magical evil people controlling Greta?

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

😂 Hamas aren’t a problem, Israel certainly is though.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Hamas massacred villages. That's not a problem to you?

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don’t care about Hamas, they would not exist without the ZioNazi state of Israel existing.

If you dislike Hamas, fight to see Israel removed as was Rhodesia.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You are implying the Palestinian state would be like Zimbabwe?

Aslo you're saying you don't care about villages being massacred. How about the Palestinians executed in the streets of Gaza by Hamas the day after the ceasefire was declared? How about Uday Rabie, do you not care about him? Have you even heard his name in your little bubble world?

Obviously you don't really care about Palestinians, you only care about your hatred. You're in a hate group. Same hate group your "little Greta" got duped into being a part of. Both you and Greta aren't all that different from Kyle Rittenhouse.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don’t give a flying fuck about genociders.

I’m saying Palestinians should be free to decide their own future, not subject to genocide by Israeli scum.

Are you a Zionist?

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No, I'm not Jewish. That's what you mean by "Zionist" isn't it? White supremacists use "Globalist" as a code word for Jews, again, you're no different from them.

Not one word of empathy from you for the Palestinians Hamas has tortured and killed. Shows how much you care about them.

Do you also not care about Iranians that are being gunned down by the Ayatollah regime as we speak? Or do you think those protesters are your enemy because they say "Neither Gaza nor Lebanon, I sacrifice my life for Iran” because unlike you they understand what's going on.

I'm on the side of the Palestinians that protest against Hamas at the risk of being tortured to death. I'm on the side of the Iranians that are protesting right now at the risk of being gunned down. Whose side are you one? The authoritarians that uses hatred of Israel as a tool of oppression?

Maybe look at the images of what's happening in Iran right now and ask yourself "are we the baddies?" Because right now, you're on the side of the guys machine gunning down crowds of people.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 1 points 2 days ago

No, it’s not what I mean you antisemetic piece of shit. I mean do you think the ethnostate of Israel has the right to exist.

You’re clearly a Zionist, so get lost.

[–] gustofwind@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago

No see because they were not in the same place on earth they were facing different parts of the matrix so it all checks out

[–] etherphon@midwest.social 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

If the only thing different is their political/moral views then they're not very different, they could have the exact same personality only opposite views depending on how they were raised. Not that I believe in any of that either.

load more comments
view more: next ›