this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2026
42 points (88.9% liked)

Games

22748 readers
580 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] verdi@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago

Not even thinking of anything till the steam frame is out!

[–] termaxima@slrpnk.net 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

171-inch doesn't make any sense in this context.

We know it's 1080p, but what definition ? In other words, how far does that supposedly "171 inch" TV sit from your face ?

[–] Matty_r@programming.dev 4 points 5 days ago

"like sitting in front of a whopping 171-inch display from four meters away"

[–] oopsgodisdeadmybad@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Say that second sentence again, but slowly.

[–] termaxima@slrpnk.net 2 points 4 days ago

I meant definition. Aka pixels per centimeter squared.

[–] Arcka@midwest.social 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Right? 1080p is literally resolution of 1920x1080.

Maybe they meant to say Dot Pitch?

[–] termaxima@slrpnk.net 0 points 4 days ago

I meant definition.

[–] johntash@eviltoast.org 5 points 6 days ago

I'm kind of interested depending on pricing. Using it as a monitor would be neat too

[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 days ago

These things always have light isolation issues. It’s why the google glass failed and why Apple and Microsoft tried to do AR based on a VR headset instead of glasses like this.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

mmmm. these kinda look like you could wear them with a pair of glasses behind them.

[–] johntash@eviltoast.org 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

They come with a thing you can put prescription lenses in, so maybe!

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 1 points 6 days ago

that kinda sounds like no then. usually being able to put in lenses suggests its not meant to be worn with glasses.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago

May save you a click:

No price yet, similar products have launched at $699