this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2026
342 points (98.9% liked)

politics

26992 readers
2345 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The FIFA peace prize clearly went to his head

all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 102 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Technically illegal, but because we no longer have a functioning Legislative branch, legality is moot.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 56 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Don't forget the judicial branch, though! Importantly, they won't do anything either!

[–] human@slrpnk.net 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And also we don't give a shit about the UN

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Fun fact: the American Servicemembers Protection Act is an actual American law that says, if the International Criminal Court ever tries an American for war crimes...

We will invade the fucking Netherlands.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Service-Members%27_Protection_Act

[–] elvith@feddit.org 5 points 3 days ago

Can the Nederlands invoke article 5 of NATO of they get invaded, then? ^/s^

[–] Pulsar@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Plus judge John Roberts gave Trump total immunity, so he is above the law, more alike a King than a democratic elected leader.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

After Cromwell's intervention, British kings have far less power than what the corrupt Robers court gave to Trump.

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 days ago

chuck schumer won't call it illegal

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 49 points 3 days ago (2 children)

This will bring ICC charges.

How poetic would it be that Jack Smith goes back to working for the ICC where he locked up war lords, only to lock up Trump.

I'm going to huff that hopium, leave me be.

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 28 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)
[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

As if Congress has anything to do with deciding whether we go to war!

[–] Psaldorn@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The retaliatory war would be more legal than the illegal war that started it

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 day ago

International law recognizes an absolute and inalienable right of nations to defend themselves.

[–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 26 points 3 days ago (4 children)

The US is not a member of the ICC and has rules specifically disallowing US members from being brought under charges by the ICC.

Fucking stupid, right?

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

Well, that leaves the ICC off the list of possible solutions. On to the next one.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago

And the US is currently sanctioning ICC judges in ways that destroy their personal lives.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/canadian-judge-icc-trump-1.7613704

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Oh yeah I knew this but I'd love to see the standoff between Netherlands and the 119+ other signatories versus the USA having arrested Trump. Granted, I think he'd have to be out of office and a Democratic president in charge to look the other way, but I'm not when sure another republican president would do much for him.

Ah well it's a pipedream anyway.

Fuck right off!?!?!

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 31 points 3 days ago

Anything the US president does is legal, the supreme court says so

[–] bender223@lemmy.today 3 points 2 days ago

bro, since he ended 8 wars, he has to start 8 wars just to balance things out

/s

[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago

Like trump has held back on doing ANYTHING because it's illegal and unwise.

[–] BranBucket@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

illegal and unwise.

Shocked. Shocked! That could describe damn near everything he does.

Bet this gets Epstein out of the headlines, and all he had to do was kidnap the duly elected leader of a foreign nation and start yet another war for oil. That's obviously a master class in political subtlety.

We should have known this was imminent after Trump's new years' resolution was "peace on earth." With his demented brain, and his pathological need to say the opposite of what he's doing, that statement might as well have been a declaration of war on the world.

[–] sundaymidnight@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

When you will do something? Come on, man, a pedophile is running the White House. I believed the USA people had more balls.

But my problem isn't your country but I don't want this pedophile extending his child molesters' nets over all the countries

A "libertarian" (trumpist Argentine) deputy was a CP fan and was arrested. Javier Milei could be perfectly a pedophile too like Trump.

[–] Avicenna@programming.dev 4 points 3 days ago

Trump is a thug and turned US goverment into a glorified mafia

[–] GuyFawkesV@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Trump has his Poland. Will the U.S. and the rest of the world wake up? Doubtful.