this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2026
732 points (98.9% liked)

Political Memes

2188 readers
510 users here now

Non political memes: !memes@sopuli.xyz

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 43 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Did... did this person just say that unemployed people shouldn't get to vote?

[–] LeFrog@discuss.tchncs.de 29 points 1 month ago

If those people could read they would be really upset: even unemployed people pay taxes. Even children! Or do they not pay value-added tax when buying groceries, fuel tax when fueling their car or property tax¹

¹ Of course they pay property tax even when living in a rental unit. The landlord calculates rent with such expenses in mind.

[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Matt Walsh is a self described Christian-Nationalist fascist. So that's expected from him.

What's also expected is that he's a creep who obsesses over the fertility of 16 year old girls.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

It's Matt Walsh. He knows that sharing his actual views would lose a portion of his female and non-white viewers

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Literacy tests and similar are a terrible idea.

[–] RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Yeah we did this during the Jim Crow era and it was a bunch of trick questions designed to stop black people from voting.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I'd settle for not a criminal nor foreign intelligence asset. Intelligence used loosely.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We should let felons vote. It's become a feedback cycle of racism and disenfranchisement. Voting is a right, not a privilege.

[–] ngdev@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

id say that letting convicted criminals vote could help get convicted criminals elected but uh... yeah

[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Doesn't work that way in reality. It is more about people being convicted on small charges en mass to keep them from voting.

Or

I don't think most Trump voters in 2024 were convicted criminals.

[–] ngdev@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

sure, just said it so i could make the joke

[–] 18107@aussie.zone 5 points 1 month ago

If you can take rights away from one person, you can take those rights away from anyone. If voting is a right, then it must be a right for all.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

If prisoners can vote for someone to free themselves from prison, you've jailed too many people and a fuctional society shouldn't be jailing that many prople.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The US doesn't allow prisoners to vote and the US has the more people in prison than any other country in the world. And now there's a huge police force being built up that targets the places that didn't vote for the current President.

And who determines who is a "foreign intelligence asset"? Maybe we should check your phone and see what you've posted on the internet to make sure you're not a foreign intelligence asset. You don't want the government checking your phone? That proves you shouldn't aren't trustworthy enough to vote!

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 3 points 1 month ago

who determines who is a “foreign intelligence asset”?

Foreign Intelligience, who have confirmed Trump was a Russian Asset first scoped out in the 80s and again when the Russians interacted directly with Trump's 2016 campaign and ran indirect psyops on FaceBook.

I'm all for letting prisoners vote, I just don't want a guy whose crimes include trying to overthrow democracy into the fucking White House, even for simple things like Tourism.

[–] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Can we pull up matt's tax records and see if he pays?

Or give him a civics exam?

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Every voter already is a taxpayer, you dolt.

[–] sudo@lemmy.today 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They are, presumably, referring to trump not paying taxes, not ever releasing his own tax returns, and his organization being convinced and tax fraud, admitting to mortgage fraud, and countless other examples of his financial fraud over decades. You dolt.

[–] ada@piefed.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago

No, it was Matt Walsh, a self confessed fascist. He was not being ironic

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago

My comment is directed to Matt Walsh’s tweet.

[–] Stern@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Ironically enough, why we don't have poll taxes and literacy tests would likely be on a 8th grade civics exam.

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Unrelated, butt fuck this dude for besmirching the good name of "Matt Walsh"!

That dude is an amazing actor and doesn't deserve to be in the same orbit as this fuck wit.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago

I think about this every time I see this goon's name. Matt Walsh is a comedy legend. UCB co-founder

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 8 points 1 month ago

I'd settle for Matt Walsh shutting the fuck up forever.

[–] blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago

Let's include all elected positions in that, and all newscasters while we're at it.

[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

As a millennial, civics was never taught in my school. Had to learn that shit on my own.

[–] Sc00ter@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Odd. I'm also a millennial and we started civics lessons in 3rd or 4th grade, then continued civics or some version of history until 12th. All of it american unless you took AP Euro

[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We had social studies in 5th grade and government for junior year. None of it covered how elections work, what our civil rights are, or covered much of what the Constitution and its amendments are.

[–] scintilla@crust.piefed.social 4 points 1 month ago

I had to take AP gov before they even started covering any of the "behind the scenes" stuff like party primaries. Before that it was just "the Democrats and Republicans select a nominee for president and you can pick between the two." Red states aren't behind in education for nothing though.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Every appointed office is occupied by a person selected ant random every three years.

That way we have to make sure everyone can do every job.

Specialization is for insects.

[–] ngdev@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

expertise and experience is extremely valuable and can only be gotten through specialization. jack of all trades master of none situation

i will add that i like the lottery idea and its backed up by studies (or a study idk how many)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 18107@aussie.zone 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

What we need is a jury who can decide to allow or block individual bills (one jury per bill).

The average person doesn't have the experience to write bills, but they do have empathy to understand when a bill is unjust.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago

I didn't have a civics class at all and I don't think its legally required

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

Omg I love literacy testing it's my favorite way to arbitrarily block people based on physical characteristics the local ruling party doesn't like

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 3 points 1 month ago

What? Anyway, here on my friend's t phone, eating t stakes at the world famous t casino while reading about the latest thing that starts with a t. Can't say the entire name unless I want a fed visit and a red eye.

[–] Nosavingthrow@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (6 children)

I'm happy to let this one through. The right would never win another election.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 22 points 1 month ago

Nope. The tests would be rigged. There's a reason they're illegal nearly everywhere in the world.

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

They didn’t make you study anything about the Jim Crow era in school?

[–] SuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 month ago

Right???

I'm not even a fan of taking the right to vote away from criminals - since as I think we can see in the US, it gives the establishment reason to create more criminals.

[–] Nosavingthrow@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Did I take high school civics? Of course. Heaven forbid a guy indulge a brief fantasy where the right permanently locks itself out of elections.

[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 month ago

Literacy tests and similar things are historically not chill.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 3 points 1 month ago

Anyone who thinks this is a good idea and makes less than 200k$ a year shouldn't have passed their 8th grade civics exam.

[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 3 points 1 month ago

Tests done in bad faith have historically undermined the whole thing. (Which is what everyone is saying, but I am using different words to reach more readers.)

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 2 points 1 month ago

People thought that about the first Trump term.

[–] moonshadow@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 month ago

Now That's What I Call Posting

load more comments
view more: next ›