this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2025
208 points (99.5% liked)

Enough Musk Spam

3221 readers
194 users here now

For those that have had enough of the Elon Musk worship online.

No flaming, baiting, etc. This community is intended for those opposed to the influx of Elon Musk-related advertising online. Coming here to defend Musk or his companies will not get you banned, but it likely will result in downvotes. Please use the reporting feature if you see a rule violation.

Opinions from all sides of the political spectrum are welcome here. However, we kindly ask that off-topic political discussion be kept to a minimum, so as to focus on the goal of this sub. This community is minimally moderated, so discussion and the power of upvotes/downvotes are allowed, provided lemmy.world rules are not broken.

Post links to instances of obvious Elon Musk fanboy brigading in default subreddits, lemmy/kbin communities/instances, astroturfing from Tesla/SpaceX/etc., or any articles critical of Musk, his ideas, unrealistic promises and timelines, or the working conditions at his companies.

Tesla-specific discussion can be posted here as well as our sister community /c/RealTesla.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

According to a tool from the Brookings Institution’s Hamilton Project, which tracks government money, indicated that federal spending didn’t slow down contrary to the big promises made. As per the findings highlighted by the Brookings Institution, outlays had risen from $7.135 to 7.558 trillion as of December 19. This constitutes for a nearly 6% increase.

In turn, Cato Institute’s analysis of the report noted, “DOGE had no noticeable effect on the trajectory of spending. But it did help engineer the largest peacetime workforce reduction on record.” The reported data further showed that all this increase in spending was mapped out even when the federal employment was slashed by 271,000, accounting for a 9% slump since January 2025.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 18 points 1 day ago

That's because it was never intended to do anything they said it was going to do. It was always about getting access to the government's data and butchering regulatory bodies that must personally did not like. In that regard it was a magnificent success.

[–] owenfromcanada@lemmy.ca 49 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It's almost like it was never about reducing spending, it was about getting rid of people who got in the way of or otherwise displeased the oligarchy, and finding new creative ways to funnel more taxpayer money into their pockets.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 30 points 1 day ago

displeased the oligarchy

Musk himself in particular by shutting down the investigations into his multiple crimes.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 5 points 1 day ago

also giving the data to palintir and putin.

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nah, I'm pretty sure they actually believed they could make things more efficient.

Yes, they also wanted to steal some data and tidy up some dissenters, but they did think they could achieve their stated objective.

[–] forrgott@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No.

They have no interest in any of that. A smaller government is more easily corrupted, that's it. That was always the actual reason for going on about "efficiency".

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well, that's a whole other thing really.

"Small" Governments outsource lots of work to consultancies - usually owned by the wives of elected officials.

[–] forrgott@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What "while other thing".

That's...a prime example of exactly what I'm talking about...?

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 2 points 23 hours ago

"whole" other thing. It's a phrase. In this meaning you raise a valid point but it doesn't detract from what I'm saying.

[–] tacosanonymous@mander.xyz 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Didn’t they have to rehire most laid off and they had to pay lost wages, court fines/fees etc?

[–] xorollo@leminal.space 10 points 1 day ago

Some, yes, and many of the vacancies took the defeated resignation program where they were paid normal salaries to not come to work for the rest of the fiscal year. So they were still paid through September

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

In terms of the soft power lost by disbanding USAID I'm sure it's actually a much, much higher figure over the long term.

It was about two things: dismantling offices that were investigating Musk (while putting fear of retribution in others planning to do the same), and weakening the US govt, because a weaker and less organized govt is easier to control. Then there's the suspected download of all the data of every US citizen from the Social Security database - which further assists Musk and plutocrats in gathering personal details for any investigators that cross them.

It was all for personal gain, and the Republican morons who cheered it on will never understand it.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

And he will face exactly zero consequences because everything is awful.

[–] CameronDev@programming.dev 22 points 1 day ago

It wasn't meant to decrease spending. We all knew that.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 day ago

Wow it's almost like Elon is an idiot fascist con man or something, who has no fucking clue what he's talking about, regarding basically any topic.

And we got fewer services and worse operations to boot. Task failed successfully.