this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2025
138 points (97.9% liked)

politics

26843 readers
1719 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

[Judge] Benitez was confirmed despite overwhelming opposition from the American Bar Association's Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary, which rates the qualifications of judicial nominees. A substantial majority of the committee rated Benitez "not qualified" and a minority rated him as "qualified." In 2004 testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee, the ABA committee investigator reported that, "Interviewees repeatedly told me that Judge Benitez displays inappropriate judicial temperament with lawyers, litigants, and judicial colleagues; that all too frequently, while on the bench, Judge Benitez is arrogant, pompous, condescending, impatient, short-tempered, rude, insulting, bullying, unnecessarily mean, and altogether lacking in people skills." …

On May 1, 2024, the Judicial Council of the Ninth Circuit publicly disciplined Benitez for judicial misconduct because he had unlawfully ordered a teenage girl to be shackled during her father's sentencing hearing: “First, the shackling of a spectator at a hearing who is not engaged in threatening or disorderly behavior exceeds the authority of a district judge. Second, creating a spectacle out of a minor child in the courtroom chills the desire of friends, family members, and members of the public to support loved ones at sentencing.”

Nominated in 2004 by George W. Bush. Youth tansgender suicide rates will skyrocket under this holding, but I guess that's lockstep the GOP's desires: more dead LGBT.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 20 hours ago

This is going to kill someone. School is often one of the few places kids and teens can come for help outside of parents. If your parents are transphobic, and a teacher finds out and tells them, that child is going to be killed.

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 1 points 17 hours ago

We need to do more to protect lgbt kids from abusive parents

[–] fedupwithbureaucracy@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (2 children)

An absolute fucking monster that should be punished severely! ALL trans youth suicide should be levied against this judge as “accessory to murder”

[–] fedupwithbureaucracy@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The downvote is someone who would kill their kid if they said that they were trans.

[–] MBech@feddit.dk 2 points 20 hours ago

Could also just be a misclick. I've done that a few times.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Hope this can be appealed, and what can be done "legally " to remove him from the bench?

[–] SereneSadie@quokk.au 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Thanks, no-voters. Continuing to bat for the fences with all you accomplished.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Bbbuttt... 'i didn't vote for him...! I'm one of the good guys! (Didn't vote for her, either.) Both suck! Equally!'

[–] quantumharsh@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

Are teachers allowed to keep any secrets about students from their parents?

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world -5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wait, am I missing something? This just says they have the right, not any kind of requirement. So basically saying teachers have free speach. This doesn't seem controversial to me. It's a cornerstone of the constitution that the current administration is trying to take away. I would be upset if they were ordered to report it... but I am also against them being ordered not to. The majority of teachers I have met, want the best for the kids. And they would only want to even bring up the subject if they thought the kid needed help in some way, and that the parents could provide. Sure there are exceptions, but tieing the hands of the majority to enable punishment of a minority isn't the answer. In reality, if a teacher tells a parent that thier kid is using different pronouns, and the parent gets very upset, the teacher is a mandatory reporter. So if any reasonable person would think the parent may in some way cause harm, which would include inducing suicide, they have to report it. So they are already incentivized to not say anything, and in many cases could be disciplined if they did. So even though this judge sounds like a jerk, overall, he has the right idea. Teachers shouldn't be censored.

[–] Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Mandatory reporters means abuse. A kid wanting to be trans without telling their parents does not equal abuse. Of course you're being disingenuous so fundamentalist Christain parents can send their kids to conversion therapy so they can eventually commit suicide and you have zero care about the well being of the child and want to push your conservative Christian bullshit. If you werent you'd realize how low the suicide rates go down when kids are able to openly trans

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world -1 points 21 hours ago

You should really read up. While it is state dependent, emotional abuse is cover under mandatory reporting in most state.

I get that you're not too bright, didn't read the article, and didn't really read what I wrote, but... acting like nazis and telling teachers what they can and can't say to parents isn't the way to defeat the nazis.