this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2025
184 points (100.0% liked)

politics

31297 readers
1562 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Move marks president’s latest effort to dismantle pollution regulations and support for cleaner-running vehicles

Donald Trump announced on Wednesday that he is repealing the Biden-era federal fuel economy standards, significantly weakening fuel efficiency requirements for tens of millions of new gasoline-powered cars and light trucks.

It marks the US president’s latest effort to dismantle pollution regulations and federal support for cleaner-running vehicles and renewable energy. Burning gasoline is a significant contributor to global heating and transportation is the largest source of greenhouse gas emissions in the United States.

“We are officially terminating Joe Biden’s ridiculously burdensome, horrible actually, Cafe standards that imposed expensive restrictions,” Trump said in an Oval Office announcement, flanked by top auto executives including the CEOs of Ford and Stellantis. “It put tremendous upward pressure on car prices, combined with the insane electric vehicle mandate.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 45 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (31 children)

This is what you voted for protest-non-voters.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

But Genocide Joe or some shit

load more comments (30 replies)
[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Yeah, but car makers will still adhere to the intentional standard, since the intentional market is what they can profit from the most

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Depends. I don't think we are exporting a whole lot of SUVs and pickups...especially big body-on-frame SUVs.

CAFE standards already killed the small/midsize car market. Automakers have all their chips in the SUV/CUV segment, because they are in the same category as giant trucks, and thus they improve the average fuel economy.

That, combined with the fact that Trump doesn't do anything for the heck of it. Somebody is gaining (or at least planning to gain) from this (besides him)...makes me think that this will have significant negative impacts for the environment.

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 4 points 10 months ago

I'm not sure there are many body on frame SUVs left.

And the "same category as trucks" has more to do with safety standards. Fuel economy has to do with wheelbase; the way the math works out, it's easier to build a less fuel efficient massive vehicle than a more fuel efficient small one.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

This is for the average across the fleet.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Unfortunately, the EU is about to partly cave on that* for lesser tariffs. I can't believe this is happening.

* at least security in SUVs; not sure about emissions. Hopefully not, but the agreement does not specify.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago (2 children)

National standards might change, but I’m betting California and some other states will still hold car manufacturers to a higher standard.

[–] Bristlecone@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

Reasonable, but this shit still fucking pisses me off

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Just tax fuel more and let math do the work. Europeans are shifting to EVs because environment? It's because gasoline is $7.50 a gallon and they can do math.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Fuel efficiency—the measurement for getting more mileage out of the same amount of gasoline. Congratulations, MAGA voters, you played yourself! When you pick up that new pile of trash made by Ford or Stellantis (and I know you will because they're AMERICAN* cars), I hope you enjoy the higher gas expenses that you voted for.

* With the extra irony being that many of those "American" brands are owned by Stellantis, which isn't even headquartered anywhere in North America.

[–] Skankhunt420@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They already played themselves by picking the 'American' vehicles. They are all trash and hard to work on.

The Japanese ones are really the only ones built for longevity and ease of maintenance.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Shame SAAB went away. No one beat them on longevity. Volvo comes close, but even they don't have hundreds of cars with 2,000,000 miles on the odometer. SAAB hasn't made a car since 2011 and keeps adding cars to the list.

[–] Skankhunt420@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

My buddy has a Volvo and had to spend $200 to replace one of his headlight hubs because it got rainwater in it.

They made it to where you have to hook it up to a Volvo computer because it needs proprietary software to set up with the rest of the car. None of the local mechanics would even touch it and all told us the same reason why.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So the plan is to sell inbred rednecks thirstier trucks, while gasoline demand is decreasing and will become a niche product in a decade.

Enjoy your $300 fillups boys.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

And after buying inefficient vehicles, they'll complain loudly about the price of fuel

[–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Oh I can't wait for the next non-Repulican president so they can print more dumbass stickers saying "I did that" when the price goes up.

[–] Skankhunt420@sh.itjust.works 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

"I want to destroy the world quicker because think of all the shareholder value we can create along the way"

Its really fucked up man. I'm not a communist at all but I start to understand why people would want to go the complete opposite way of this system.

Its basically "I don't give a fuck how many people die or even if we destroy the entire world in the process I just want to generate more money for the people at the 'top'" and its really sad.

There's absolutely no reason to do this, other than generate more money at the expense of the citizens and the entire planet.

[–] LoafedBurrito@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Great, another way to give oil companies more money and still ignoring the cost of living crisis we are all struggling to deal with.

Another GOP idea that will hurt us way more than it will help.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Another GOP idea that will hurt us way more than it will help.


It'll help. It'll even be pleasant for the rich donors. The filthy plebiscite deserves to eat the shit it wallows in because the rich have all the money.

-The corrupt politicians fucking us over.

[–] UncleMagpie@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

Why the fuck is the president rolling back or setting any regulation? That’s what congress is for. Also, for example, they are supposedly handling tariffs and upholding the constitution. Their duties include impeaching and removing from office presidents that violate their oaths and the constitution.

Yes I know we’re in this mess due to the combo of an evil fascist president and a weak corrupt congress. And decades of congress allowing presidential power to escalate.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'm sure this won't be good but CAFE standards were garbage and resulted in all the giant trucks we see to day so fuck em.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

The problem is they’re not repealing the truck exceptions, they’re repealing the increased efficiency

[–] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 6 points 10 months ago

Trumps got to keep those angry older white guys driving lifted blacked out trucks with a sticker of a little kid peeing on something happy.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Anyone remember how EVs were totally going to take over by 2030?

[–] Killer57@lemmy.ca 5 points 10 months ago

They still are, everywhere that isn't the US or parts of Canada

[–] HerrBeter@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

This wasn't very popular in the fossil fuel industry, they've done everything in their power to stop BEV and electricity

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 4 points 10 months ago

Just another horrible thing in a long line of horrible things both Trump admins have done. Wrt climate action, leaving the Paris Agreement was the big one. After that, this - perversely - feels like par for the course.

Cafe standards

Not familiar with that turn of phrase ... oh, it's another acronym: CAFE

load more comments
view more: next ›