The price difference between Cherry MX and the competitors was huge. Just shows how copyright, in this case at least, failed to breed innovation and they just sat on their patent until it expired. Bad luck for the shareholders!
Hardware
A community for news and discussion about the hardware side of technology. Questions and support posts are also welcome, so long as they are relevant to hardware and interesting technologies therein.
Rules
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original link
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
Big boo hoo. Innovate or die. As it should be.
Fucking... How? They sell simple keyboards for hundreds of dollars.. and people actually buy them. How can you possibly not make a profit from that?
if you read the article it explains how. TLDR: patents expired, competitors are eating their launch, perifery division is deeply in the red.
And they've fallen behind mainly because they haven't delivered a real innovation since coming up with the MX switch. As soon as the patent expired, their competitors delivered improved products that they had years to come up with but didn't.