this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2025
293 points (88.9% liked)

politics

26464 readers
2310 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Is... there any precedent or process for... un-granting statehood, and returning it to being a territory?

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

As someone who can't stop playing EUV: oh yes.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Hah!

I never got into EU or HOI (beyond just watching youtubers paint maps, with commentary), but I have definitely had moments in Stellaris when I realized:

Fuck, this other empire doesn't like me and is going to out economy me in a few years, if I don't overhaul my own entire economy.

So then I sit down and rework the whole uh, sector type governance structure, re-specialize various planetary economies... and that does essentially mean that some systems that used to be their own sector or the functional regional capitol, well, now they're smaller fish in a reorganizrd, bigger pond.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I'll have to try Stellaris again. I didn't really play it a ton, so I never really wrapped my brain around it.

EUV has been really fun. A lot more fun than I've had in previous Paradox grand strategy games. It's also somehow both more complex and more accessible than EUIV.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Well, I have a love hate/relationship with Paradox.

On the one hand, they make basically perfect games for autists, such as myself.

On the other hand, their business model is fucking atrocious.

Oh, you want to play the modern version of the game? Well, now it costs 3 or 4 times as much, with all the DLC you'll either need, or be tempted to buy.

So... as much as I enjoyed Stellaris, I'd honestly have to recommend you not try it, unless you've got a few hundred dollars that you're ok with evaporating.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Oh, I already own it lol... I don't know which (if any) dlc I have though.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago

Well, best of luck with the potential addiction problem, lol.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

Would be useful if those fed dollars the author is decrying was much more than military jobs and general entitlements like ag grants, Medicaid, and SNAP. Like yeah, their legislators don't care about those folks either. But we ain't exactly pulling a TVA anymore here so playing like neolib Clinton era bare minimum spending on poverty is a grand handout is pretty silly. For the most part nobody in the South or the Rust belt has gotten shit post NAFTA. The new deal has been dead for a long time but we're sure they owe us for managing poverty.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Cut the Failed ~~Red~~ States Loose

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I've said it before, but we need to start shutting down all these miniscule towns that have no reason for existing. They are nothing but an economic and social drain on the country.

[–] bestagon@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Kick someone out of their home because they aren’t profitable enough wtf?

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Hey, if they want to stay when the water, electric, sewage, roads, fire department, police, and all other publicly subsidized services are removed they are welcome to it. We all shouldn't have to pay because a handful of people can't adjust to the century they live in.

[–] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Uoj going to pay for my housing? How will your state handle the refugee crisis?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 3 points 4 days ago (6 children)

I don't know why they gotta show that photo. I see opportunity there. A good neighborhood is one where I can take my welder and grinder to the backyard and do whatever the whole day and nobody is bothered by the noise. Not that they accept the noise but that they live far enough from me to not hear or be bothered by the noise. If you can do that, that's a good engineering neighborhood.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] jdredbeard@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

I fact checked the ratios of federal spending to federal tax receipts, for the three states mentioned in the substack. https://smartasset.com/data-studies/states-most-dependent-on-the-federal-government-2022

Could I have help with more fact checking? The reasoning is sound, but I've been burnt before by poorly sourced opinion pieces

[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world -2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The West Coast and the North East states need to leave these useless bloodsuckers behind.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›