Technocracy

Federal vs. unitary is one part of politics that is tricky, because you cannot really say one is inherently better or helps human progress go faster than the other one. Federal systems allow smaller regions to adopt laws which means they can influence the rest of society if they are proven successful, but the same can be said for regions that are regressive or tyrannical. Living in Florida, I have personally experienced not having the same rights as people in other parts of the same country. On the other hand, a unitary state can potentially block regional progressive movements or can become tyrannical itself.

For Technocrats I think a unitary state is best since we would need to pass a lot of reforms and build a lot of infrastructure. I wouldn't mind if the technate became federalized after all the necessary foundations were built, but then it creates the question about why morality magically changes when state lines are crossed, if some parts of the country have different laws both based on morality.