this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2025
55 points (98.2% liked)

news

264 readers
904 users here now

A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.

Rules:

  1. Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
  2. Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
  3. Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
  4. Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
  5. No link shorteners
  6. No entire article in the post body

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kowowow@lemmy.ca 44 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

do it ,do it bill, say trump blew you while on the stand

[–] besselj@lemmy.ca 27 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Even if it's not true, he has nothing to lose by saying it happened. He's 79 and already has a reputation for this kinda thing

[–] Kowowow@lemmy.ca 18 points 15 hours ago

him lying about it would be low on the list of bad things he's done if nothing else and it would be the funniest possible option

[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 13 points 15 hours ago

I don't know. Last time he lied under oath about a blow job it caused quite a stir.

[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 2 points 10 hours ago

I think he could do even better by not saying it explicitly. Instead being suggestive without perjuring himself.

"Can you clarify what constitutes oral sex?"

"I am not aware if any photos of this alleged event still exist."

"I dont think I could describe what we had as a relationship"

The conservatives got so excited by this quote:

It depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is. If the—if he—if 'is' means is and never has been, that is not—that is one thing. If it means there is none, that was a completely true statement. … Now, if someone had asked me on that day, are you having any kind of sexual relations with Ms. Lewinsky, that is, asked me a question in the present tense, I would have said no. And it would have been completely true.

They would absolutely lose it over non-admission statements. The option becomes "Bill Clinton is telling the truth!" or "Trump yummied down on Bill's throbbing hot man-chicken".

And I have to say, from the very depths of my soul, the fact that I'm even thinking about both Clinton and Trump, looking at this current reality of American politics.... I fucking hate it.

Fucking stupid as fuck timeline.

[–] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 8 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I already told you, I did not have sexual relations with that woman.

We're talking about trump not Monica Lewinsky, this time.

Oh trump? Yeah I humped the Trump. We used to call it a Trump and dumb.

I still don't know what all this is about Monica but Trump all the time.

[–] xzot746@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Not sure if it was supposed to be a Trump and dump, but yours works better!

[–] orbitz@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 hours ago

I've heard it both ways.

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 8 points 13 hours ago

Imagine Bill "I did not have a sexual relationship with that woman" Clinton saving US democracy by smearing donald "grab them by the pussy" trump with the dirtiest facts 😄

Would there be a medal for that?

[–] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago

What would Bubba know?

[–] blave@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

Be careful what you wish for…