this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2025
1606 points (99.3% liked)

People Twitter

8564 readers
2057 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 58008@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Don't read the replies πŸ™ƒ

[–] don@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Holy snapping duckshit, they’re deranged beyond all ability to measure. Subhuman primates banging rocks for fun.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hodgepodgin@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

has chowder ever changed his mind during one of these or does he just troll the entire time

[–] Digit@lemmy.wtf 5 points 2 days ago

Seems a safe bet it's the latter.

Feigns being reasonable and rational, when really he's already decided what the truth is, stubbornly sticking to his naive realism. All just a ploy. Seems he thrives on it. Narcissistic troll indeed. By his actions.

[–] PhoreTwunny@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I don't understand how he doesn't get punched multiple times doing this bullshit

[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 days ago

Honestly after the whole Kirk thing im kinda surprised to see the grifters are still out in public without a layer of plexiglass. Its not like they can filter out the republicans at a republican meeting.

[–] Nerrad@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That sucks. My small biz paid back our $60k loan, with interest. What a chump I was.

[–] cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Genuinely. You paid an ice agent's salary for a year, plus signing bonus.

[–] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 5 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Wow the comments on this are wild. The complete lack of empathy on Twitter is astounding.

[–] axx@slrpnk.net 5 points 3 days ago

Years of anger, bad faith and force-fed weaponised identity politics have turned it into a point of pride for these people.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Digit@lemmy.wtf 3 points 2 days ago

Average!?

I thought the average was the Democrat party.

... Ohhhh. Right. by USA standards. I see.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Let's make a deal. We cancel SNAP and implement a Negative Income Tax as conservative economist Milton Friedman recommended. That brings everyone up to the poverty line, and everyone on SNAP today won't need it anymore.

Benefits for you:

  • close a bunch of SNAP jobs
  • retail stores don't need to remember what's snap approved and what's not

Benefits for everyone else:

  • no more poverty
  • no application process for benefits, just file a fax return
  • cash instead of food-specific benefits, so people with food can use the cash for something else they need (clothes, utilities, etc)
[–] Digit@lemmy.wtf 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, poverty's expensive for everybody.

Much as I'm loathed to ever agree with an economist (conservative or otherwise), the general thrust there's sound.

Let the currency (and energy) flow. For the good of all, the prosperity of all. Even the rich are better off.

[–] SleeplessCityLights@programming.dev 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The rich are better off is a weird saying. Who is better off a billionaire with $1 billion or a billionaire with 10 billion? They are the same, nobody can spend a billion in their lifetime. These people build $500 million mega yatchs because they have nothing better to do with their money.

[–] Digit@lemmy.wtf 1 points 2 days ago

Better off with everybody in at least sufficiency, if not abundance, even a rather egalitarian abundance with everybody afforded the best, because then they no longer have to live in fear, looking over their shoulder, dealing with the stress of having to maintain a constant deception over the impoverished masses, no longer having to maintain an army to protect them against the masses rising up. Ask them, "Do you have spaceships yet? And the reassurance everybody else does too, so they're not wanting yours?" and then maybe the "better off" becomes apparent, beyond the mono-linear mundane wealth accumulation tower.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

One cannot debate with a POS like Steven.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί