Every time I use that site it says I am unique. So is that good? Surely if I was trackable, it would match me against the previous times I'd been there.
Or maybe the site is just spouting a load of clickbaity nonsense?
this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2025
352 points (98.1% liked)
Technology
76945 readers
2971 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
If you have the cookie from them, they don't count both visits I'm pretty sure.
Non-unique would be if someone else has the exact same fingerprint.
Yes, your browser is probably generating brand new canvas and other fingerprints every visit, which is a good thing.
here is a fingerprinting test you can trust https://coveryourtracks.eff.org/
fingerprinting is nasty, i suggest canvas blocker extension because it gives them fake readouts
Librewolf + uBlock Origin + Privacy Badger + containerise
For the comedy extra point, a user agent switcher can actively lie about your browser & OS.
It should be noted that user agent switchers may break some website functionalities. I guess this is true for nearly all privacy protections, though this is the only one that gave me any noticeable trouble.
uBlock Origin and Privacy Badger shouldn't be paired together. Containers do nothing to prevent your fingerprint from being collected. LibreWolf itself is easily fingerprintable. And the user agent isn't the only telltale sign of your browser and OS, changing it will just make you more unique.
Just use Mullvad Browser with the default settings.
Using a browser like Librewolf is, itself a unique identifier bc not enough people are using it.
EFF has a tool that lets you check your “uniqueness” and bc I used a lesser known browser, it was easier to track me.
Not that I mean you shouldn’t use it. I just wanted to clarify that it doesn’t make you safe from ads. :(
https://coveryourtracks.eff.org/ is the EFF tool.
My results say that I have strong protections against tracking, and that my browser is unique. It's as good as I can get.
The agent switcher also tells the world my Librewolf on Linux is Chrome on Windows.
Isn't it a bad thing to be unique in this context? If my browser is 1 in a million, that means that a tracker can pick me out of a lineup of a million users, no? That's why a captcha can verify you as human simply by checking a box, because it can identify your unique browser as associated with human activity.
If I'm not mistaken, we want the opposite. We want our browsers to be as generic as possible if we don't want to be tracked.
I would think unique means you appear as a never before seen individual and not one they can identify from their fingerprint history. If you fingerprint twice and both are unique, you are secure.
Thanks for linking it! I should have done that. And if LibreWolf is showing as Chrome on Windows, then you’re good!
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Does anyone know if Firefox's claimed Anti fingerprinting technology is any good?
it's useless. test it out with creepjs
For me I like to prevent fingerprinting by:
Librewolf(private and less intrusive defaults) + noscript (blocking useless JavaScript) + jsshelter (Javascript sanitization) + Ublock Origin(blocking trackers and ads)
Your fingerpeint is that you aren't fingerprinted. If you think a website is like "Gosh darn it those rapscallions foiled me again! Guess I can't track them now!" You're sorely mistaken. Get a user agent switcher and pretend to be a windows, chrome user to blend in with the rest of the masses.
Good explanation.
I'm not looking to be anonymous, I want access to Stargate Atlantis that Amazon Prime is geo blocking from me.
For that, VPN works as advertised.
load more comments
(5 replies)
It's always kind of funny when the Technology folks wade into well-researched and well-worn Privacy territory.
Do you want to not wave a giant flag of your activity to Google, Meta, MS, and your ISP when you do literally anything online? Either use a VPN and Mullvad (or Librewolf, but YMMV) browser, OR a VPN and Tor OR Tor with an https bridge if paying for a VPN will make you a target (Tor bridges are not for casuals, save them for those in genuine need).
VPN locations need to be changed. Frequently. Router level VPN at home becomes your "This is me" location, then make use of VPNs on each device when you want an extra layer of obfuscation.
There's not a lot of middle ground at this point, and it's not difficult.
load more comments
(16 replies)
The only real advantage you gain is being able to watch things outside your region. Without lots of work, you’re pretty easily traceable on the modern internet.
I remember in 1996 my neighbor was in one of these fancy new things on the internet called a "chat room".
He got into an arguement with someone. It got heated. Until the other guy threatened to show up at my neighbors house.
My neighbor scoffed and laughed.
Then the guy put in my neighbors real address. To this day, that still scares me. And back then internet crime wasn't taken seriously. In fact doxxing back then may not yet have even been a crime.
FYI:
https://www.thefire.org/research-learn/doxxing-free-speech-and-first-amendment
In the US, "doxxing" laws are pretty much state-by-state and many may be violating the first amendment.
Today, yes. In 1996 "doxxing" wasn't a term. The internet was so new to people that nobody knew what it could even do.
I'll give you a great example. I remember watching a news report fall of 2000, where K*B Toys was trying this untested idea. Could they use the internet to sell things? The experts said no, and that the internet was a fad. It simply wasn't a medium you could use for commercial things......ebay aside.
In 1996 Google didn't even exist yet. I don't think Amazon was even a bookstore yet. The internet in those days was primitive, and the wild west of the technology realm.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(3 replies)
If the NSA wants you, they will get you. But I can hide from most of you with just a little email relay and a VPN
I bought a used laptop from a yard sale and only use public Wi-Fi and never use the laptop for anything with my name on it.
Pfft amateur, I break into my local Applbee’s after 2AM and use their POS terminal browser to look at used cars.
Applebee's at 2AM which leaves a physical trail? Noob. I strap meshtastic nodes on wild dogs, using them as a Internet relay at 1-2kb a second, to look at manga leaks.
I randomly separate by data packages & encode that data into the DNA of various insects & such critters that then burrow down to the tier 1 and tier 2 internets & are trained to transmit that data.
A separate group is standing by at different locations to collect the data & report back to me the results of me signing into my Google account with my full name & billing address as well as the results of by image search for "naked boobs".
There is a bit of ping, but the bandwidth can be scaled nicely.
view more: next ›