this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2025
331 points (99.7% liked)

196

5679 readers
180 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

Also, when sharing art (comics etc.) please credit the creators.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FilthyShrooms@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Your honor, while my client may be guilty, he's also weally sowwy! and you should let him free

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Note: this tactic only works for rich white boys

[–] hakase@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But he has such a bright future! 🥺

[–] idunnololz@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago

He's just misunderstood!

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I wonder if a lawyer (nearing retirement and not caring about their own license) could actually do this to get their client a mistrial.

In criminal cases, yes. However, given the cause of the mistrial, the remedy would be to do another trial with different defense counsel and new jury. The facts and charges and evidence won't change; but if you or your client reallly messed up on the stand, this could cycle the jury and give you a second chance to present without implicating your client.

Civil cases, no. Incompetence of council is not grounds for a mistrial, and I understand why. People already get bled dry in civil court litigation as it is. This would effectively create a civil court filibuster, and you know big corporations and wealthy folk would exploit that to no end.

[–] don@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago

And I object. I OBJECT that he interrupted me while I was watching OW, MY BALLS! THAT IS NOT OK! I REST MY CASE.

You're supposed to bill them lots of hours anyways and try harder to get a better case next time.

[–] kamillz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago

I'm gonna pretend like they mean another drink