this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2025
66 points (100.0% liked)

Chevron 7

1700 readers
565 users here now

Chevron 7

A community for sharing humor about Stargate in all its iterations.

Rules:

  1. Follow the Lemmy.World Terms of Service. This includes (but is not limited to):
    • Lemmy.World is not a place for you to attack other people or groups of people.
    • Always be respectful of the privacy of others who access and use the website.
    • Links to copyright infringing content are not allowed
  2. Stay on topic. Posts must be directly related to Stargate, be it a meme, joke, screenshot, discussion prompt, etc.
  3. Be good, don't be bad. You're an adult, or close enough, I trust you know how to act around people.

For more general Stargate content, visit !stargate@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Out of NOWHERE we get this announcement that a NEW Stargate series has been greenlit by Amazon. LETS GOOOOOO!!!!

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kernal64@sh.itjust.works 22 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

HOLY FUCKING SHIT IT'S NOT A REBOOT AND THE ORIGINAL CREATORS ARE MAKING IT I HAVE FULLY LOST MY GODDAMN MIND!

[–] MacStainless@piefed.social 4 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Not only the creators of SG-1, but Roland and Dean who created the freaking movie too!! It’s bananas that everyone involved with ALL aspects of SG are aboard this new endeavor. Let’s go!!

Roland reported hated SG1 though... Wonder if it grew on him over the years or if this will be a different beast entirely.

[–] StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

I CANNOT WAIT for this to be inexplicably canceled after a critically acclaimed first season! Hey, wait...

/s

Still, super stoked!

[–] SatyrSack@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

A couple relevant images I made years back

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I've never understood why the Expanse is in this list. Amazon picked it up when it already had a rabid, albeit small, audience and then cancelled it 3 seasons before the end.

[–] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Yeah, that last part stings. My favorite sci-fi series of all time. I still hold hope that they'd do the last 3 in a few years as the books were set 30 years later.

[–] SatyrSack@quokk.au 1 points 1 hour ago

Yeah, at least the series was canceled at a logical point in the story. It would be neat to be able to get the original actors back to continue the series in 30 years or something. But we have seen how difficult it can be to get an original cast back only five years after a series's cancelation, so I doubt that was their plan.

[–] negativenull@piefed.world 10 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Uhh hopefully less blatantly pro military propaganda then the previous shows.

[–] MacStainless@piefed.social 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

SG was during the era of “American military exceptionalism”, which was common at the time and we were the good guys with morals & high standards. The whole point of the team was to do good and fight against the exploitation of other worlds. The perception of the military is much different now and I think it would be more of an exploration show that’s not military based.

[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 hours ago

Expect that's never been true for the American military and Stargate literally worked so closely with the US Air Force to sanitize its perception they should be considered one the main writers.

[–] scratchee@feddit.uk 11 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

It was pro military propaganda the same way Star Trek was pro communist propaganda.

It showed the military actually being the good guys, mostly, taking account of their mistakes, mostly. Working with others and being a positive force both for their country and for everyone else, mostly.

That is a very idealised US military that bares little resemblance to the real one, and it was great propaganda for the ideal that doesn’t exist, much like Star Trek.

Frankly I don't mind fictionalizing the military to show them as idealistic, accountable, intelligent, and egalitarian. It's what they should be, and it sets an example that both gives an ideal for the real military to strive towards, and it stands in contrast to the real world issues with the actual military, highlighting the ways in which they come short or behave counter to that ideal example.

Personally I want more people that are going to enter the military to want a military like SG1 than to want a military that does what it actually has done historically. We shouldn't whitewash reality, absolutely, but that doesnt mean we can't have better examples in a sci-fi world.

[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 hours ago

Did star trek literally work hand in hand with "communists" and was reliant on them like stargate was with the US air force? Your argument is nonsensical.