this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2025
28 points (96.7% liked)

Fuck Cars

13791 readers
168 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

... Officials also acknowledge that the traffic within the loop itself will “roughly remain the same.”

That caveat is what has led to deep skepticism (well, that and experience). According to researchers at the UCLA Institute of Transportation Studies, the plan runs into the problem of induced demand. In other words, make it easier to drive somewhere? Great, now more people will drive there until it stops being easy.

There's also the issue of the contractor, the same company behind the much-delayed Automated People Mover. A spokesperson for LAX told the Los Angeles Times they have learned lessons from those very public delays and are in a "good spot because of it."

Opponents, including local resident advocates from Westchester and neighboring communities, are calling for more than a road-focused approach. They argue money might be better invested in high-capacity shuttle services, expanded bus lines and other alternatives that shift people rather than simply moving more cars.

But LAX's board is determined to upgrade its traffic arteries, leaving the bigger question looming: will smoothing the flow of cars translate to a faster journey or pave the way for more vehicles to pour in until the gridlock comes full circle? For now, the grand plan has been approved, the construction schedule locked in and the countdown to Olympics traffic has begun.

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

That's a hard NO, as hard as the pavement of the new road that LAX will build anyways.

[–] certified_expert@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Every time a headline is a question, the answer is no