this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2025
121 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

4135 readers
394 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mech@feddit.org 58 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

My prediction:
They'll quietly switch it to be enabled by default in 6 months, re-enable it on every major update, and hide the "disable permanently" toggle in a group policy or registry key.
But when you get infected they'll point to this statement and say it's your fault.

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I found the Group Policy feature on Windows XP Pro back in the early 2000s. Learned a lot about how Windows actually worked under the hood. I never ran any Home version ever again after that.

[–] IceFoxX@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Home has same features but not activated.so you could enable group policy in home version too. Well fck MS anyway

[–] kowcop@aussie.zone 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Not really, home edition has a subset of the group policy compared to pro or enterprise..

[–] IceFoxX@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The Home version also has many other features that are disabled compared to the Pro/Enterprise versions. It stands to reason that this could also have an impact on the group policy, which offers far less because so many other things are disabled. Of course, it cannot be activated easily and many things are prevented, but theoretically, all of this would also be available in the home version. As long as you do not use a customized or self-created ISO, but the standard ISO image from MS. Ultimately, the key that is subsequently activated and what is not is decisive.

However, I don't want to contradict you that the Pro/Enterprise version would be the smarter choice from the outset, because that's definitely true.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 8 points 3 months ago

I had the same prediction. This is going to be so hilarious when it happens.

[–] RichardDegenne@lemmy.zip 16 points 3 months ago
[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Every time I read about these "upgrades", I'm glad I ditched Windows on my personal computers.

[–] OhShitSon@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I still need Windows on my laptop for some schoolwork(GX works 2 for PLCs), that I can't get to work on linux.

Really happy with Fedora KDE though, some things require a bit of fiddling, but I do enjoy the troubleshooting process.

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

That's why I specified personal devices. My work laptop runs Windows 11. But it belongs to the company, so I don't really care.

For other shit of mine that requires Windows (like vehicle diagnostics software), I just run a VM.

[–] OhShitSon@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Hmm, I suppose maybe I could get GX Works to work on my main pc. It's a pirated copy that our teacher handed out to us, but iirc the installation was fairly simple.

I haven't ever used a VM though, will I have to set it up every time, or can I save the VM and start it up whenever I want to?

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I haven’t ever used a VM though, will I have to set it up every time, or can I save the VM and start it up whenever I want to?

It's just like a physical machine, except launched in a window from your desktop (or wherever you put the VM launcher). And yes, if you set it up correctly, it saves its state when it shuts down.

I use virt-manager, which is just a GUI on top of KVM/qcow. Works really well. It's available for pretty much every Linux distro.

[–] OhShitSon@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago

Thanks, I'll look into it!

[–] BoloMKXXVIII@piefed.social 10 points 3 months ago

I am guessing that the next version of Windows will require a valid credit card number while being set up. That way Copilot can purchase and install other Microsoft products for you automatically in order to complete tasks it thinks you assigned it. Your acceptance of the EULA will be all the justification they need.

[–] bitwolf@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago

And yet the CEO is surprised everyone finds it underwhelming

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I mean, it's perfectly sound advice. Don't enable features you don't understand. There are already plenty of features in Windows that would be privacy or security problems if you enable them without understanding what they do or how to use them.

[–] sbeak@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 months ago

Unfortunately, Microsoft will and is enabling these AI "features" by default. They pushed for a CoPilot key on laptops, so they really want you to use it

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

MS: We are not responsible if your computer tries to kill you if you enable AI.

User: Okay!?

MS: enables AI by default

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 3 months ago

as opposed to MS install thier proprietary spyware.