Easier to get forgiveness than permission
Individual Climate Action ✊
Discuss actions that we can directly take as individuals to reduce environmental harm.
related communities (decentralized only)
somewhat closely related to individual action:
- !vegan@slrpnk.net - Chatter on reducing GHG by way of reducing consumption of animal products (not necessarily environment-specific)
- !vegan@lemmy.blahaj.zone
- !veganism@sopuli.xyz
- !vegan@hexbear.net - Another vegan community, but apparently unreachable from slrpnk.net
- !activist_investing@lemmy.whynotdrs.org
- !nolawns@slrpnk.net - Landscaping in diverse low-waste ways
- !buyitforlife@slrpnk.net - Buy stuff that lasts a long time, if you must buy something
- !buyitforlife@discuss.tchncs.de - Buy stuff that lasts a long time, if you must buy something
- !fixing@slrpnk.net - fix it, don’t replace it
- !fixit@disflux.org
- !righttorepair@midwest.social - exercise your right to fix stuff
- !right2repair@discuss.tchncs.de - exercise your right to fix stuff
- !sustainabletech@lemmy.sdf.org - sustainable technology
- !permacomputing@lemmy.sdf.org - To discuss computing that’s not resource intensive
- !permacomputing@slrpnk.net - To discuss computing that’s not resource intensive
- !zerowaste@slrpnk.net - To discuss waste avoidance
- !anticonsumption@sopuli.xyz
- !solarpunktravel@slrpnk.net - sustainable travel, if you must travel
less closely related to individual action:
- !collapse@slrpnk.net
- !collapse@sopuli.xyz
- !energy@slrpnk.net - For chatter specifically related to green energy
- !degrowth@slrpnk.net - Economics of reducing excessive consumption
- !cdr@slrpnk.net - Discuss CO₂ removal
- !treehuggers@slrpnk.net - Discuss forestation and reforestation
- !reclamation@slrpnk.net - Discuss reclaiming disturbed lands
- ~~!climate@slrpnk.net~~ ← ⚠ moderator locked a civil, on-topic, science-supported post without cause (see “The core of the climate social problem: stubbornness. The mitigating effect of psilocybin is worth a look” in the modlog)
- !climate@lemmy.stad.social
- !climate_lm@slrpnk.net ← climate change discussion without excessive moderation
I can't comment on the legitimacy of the concerns about his actions impacting ecology or flood control - although I suspect they are overstated if not outright nonsense - but crikey that concrete LA river looks terrible, please anything to make it nicer.
It does look terrible, however it definitely serves a useful purpose. Since the LA basin is basically desert, the ground doesn’t soak up water very well, which leaves it prone to flash flooding.
So the dangerous part about physically being in the concrete river is that it might rain in the mountains 50 miles away, and in just a few minutes there’s a roaring wave of water passing through. Every time it rains out there, someone inevitably gets caught up in it and needs to be rescued, or worse.
Oh no, the water is flowing quickly and not getting absorbed by the dry soil, let us build a giant smooth ramp of completely impermeable material, that will fix things! Now every time it rains people get swept up it, yay!
You know what helps slow down floods, improve soil water absorption, and reduce desertification? Wetlands and lakes. You know why Los Angeles was colonized by the Spanish rather than any other place in its stretch of its very dry coastline? Wetlands and lakes.
The LA river has the same story as its highways and its public transit: elitists destroying anything that does not acknowledge their superiority, actively ignoring if not outright pursuing the suffering of those they believe to be below them.
In this case, real estate developers wanted to replace the low population density wetlands with suburbia to sell houses on the cheap, and when this meant the water had nowhere to go and the city got flooded because they built it wrong, they bullt the concrete chute as a kludge.
Any sane desert city treats water as a precious commodity, not something to flush into the sea at the highest speeds possible. But that would require rebuilding the city right, often in places inhabited by poor people because of the floods urban designers caused.
No argument here, I was only explaning why it exists.
I love this idea so much. I wonder how I can bring about this level of 'minimalist' change without having any waterways like that to work with.