this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2025
151 points (99.3% liked)

Privacy

4204 readers
12 users here now

Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.

Rules

PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!

  1. Be civil and no prejudice
  2. Don't promote big-tech software
  3. No apathy and defeatism for privacy (i.e. "They already have my data, why bother?")
  4. No reposting of news that was already posted
  5. No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
  6. No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)

Related communities:

Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 32 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Forgive me, but in my opinion, the headline is misleading .. at which point in time have any lawmakers anywhere Known What They're Doing?

So far all I've ever seen in the 49 years I've been allowed to vote, is short term politically expedient decision making, aimed at getting re-elected (or paid), rather than science based decision making processes aimed at improving society as a whole.

[–] RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 5 days ago

Yum, a circlejerk!

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The further we go in time the more complex life in society becomes.

A feudal lord making logistical decisions about how iron in its economy was still capable to grasp how iron is used/reused to make tools, weapons and contraptions.

With modern technology our tools have become a black box (almost literally) we use them but we do not understand the components and systems it relies on.

Many times a bad law can still be followed, proven by the many dumb rules people today still follow regardless of the existence of new facts.

But when you blanketban vpn? It becomes to nonsensical to even consider following it.

Vpn is more then just a tool to avoid local internet rules. They are an essential technology for secure connections between devices. Standard in almost any professional corporation.

(Anti corpo as i am, this time i actually believe there lobbying will stop this. Enemy of my enemy is a useful tool )

This is the equivalent of the feudal lord looking at the iron logistics and ruling that smithing and metallurgy are now banned practices.

Leaving people without proper tools to work the land, the soldiers without weapons to enforce any law.

Greedy neighbour lords ready to exploit your mistake to invade then.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

They will ban VPNs for everyone except corporations who can pay a ~~bribe~~ fee for an encryption license. It will only be the little people who will not be allowed to encrypt their communications. And you won't be able to ignore the law and do it anyway on your phone, because your only options are Google and Apple, and both reserve the right to decide which developers get to distribute their software. (Google will be introducing this restriction next year.) The availability of open operating systems for computers is a situation lawmakers will no doubt want to rectify at some point.

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Actually, having just read the article they are not banning vpn at all. (Bad title)

They are mandating that sites that subjectively provide sexual content ban traffic that comes from a vpn.

Both corpo and private networks are fine.

I am not sure how enforceable this is. It might be limited to a “known list of vpn providers ip addresses” but how they ever know if you have a personal server running overseas?

[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 week ago

Wikipedia bans from editing addresses from known VPNs.