this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2025
102 points (91.8% liked)

World News

50860 readers
1616 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

On both Left and Right, many like to take the Whitlam dismissal— as it became known — as a constitutional struggle between an old British-oriented establishment and a new, progressive Australia. But in retrospect, it’s hard to doubt that the 1975 dismissal was in fact a soft coup d’état, heavily influenced by US power and influence.

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Fleur_@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 4 days ago

Whitlam was a truly based leftist politician in Australia, with all the good and bad that comes with. Regardless of what his detractors say he dramatically improved the lives of Australian workers during his term and the fact that his democratic mandate was stripped is a stain on Australian political history.

[–] stonkage@aussie.zone 1 points 5 days ago

No one made labor/Whitlam appoint senators to overseas posts or to the high court. If they hadn't made some of these crazy the decisions they wouldn't have been a dismissal

Hell, Whitlam appointed Kerr albeit it was his last choice.

The whole thing was a massive own goal for Labor. I'm sure there was some shenanigans between Kerr and Fraser, but I think it was opportunistic rather than the Palace or CIA.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Pretty week case laid out here. While I wouldn't be surprised by CIA involvement, they present essentially zero evidence of such...

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

On the other hand there is plenty of evidence to show the Crown was involved.

The CIA wouldn't ever need to be involved, if there is US involvement, they would have simply asked UK.

The author also seems to have written this article a few times before, he's never provided any evidence.

https://jacobin.com/2020/07/gough-whitlam-dismissal-letters-john-kerr-australia

https://www.crikey.com.au/2015/11/25/rundle-proving-the-cia-backed-conspiracy-that-brought-down-whitlam/