Her comment doesn't align with what she says her party's considering/doing. It isn't greedy for a party with a near majority, if they're prevented from enacting important legislation due to a tiny minority party saying "do it our way or else", to move to an election.
One of the obvious shifts in policy lately, amongst all politicians, is a move towards authoritarianism. Small/minority parties exerting outsized control over the majority by "putting their foots down" and not compromising even though they're in the less-supported position/party, is one of the reasons we're seeing the mess we see -- eg. things like the Far-Right in the states controlling everything, just because their extremists held the balance of power and felt they could dictate terms to the majority.