this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2025
704 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

76945 readers
3153 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/52834195

https://archive.is/je5sj

“If adopted, these amendments would not simplify compliance but hollow out the GDPR’s and ePrivacy’s core guarantees: purpose limitation, accountability, and independent oversight,” Itxaso Dominguez de Olazabal, from the European Digital Rights group, told EUobserver.

The draft includes adjustments to what is considered “personal data,” a key component of the GDPR and protected by Article 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] biotin7@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 week ago
[–] Freigeist@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Just when it became technically feasible to autodecline in all kinds of cookie banners with AI enabled browsers/browser plug-ins...

[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Political views are reactionary: if they're against you, then naturally and by no real choice of your own, you're against them.

So if anyone goes against you for your political views, they've made that decision long before you even knew they were against you.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (7 children)

oh yeah i've heard about it.

basically, people got pissed with cookie banners so much that they complained to the EU government about it.

the EU government said "well, if people don't like the choice to allow or deny cookies, i guess we'll un-do these regulations".

I think this is a very good example how people are always complaining, no matter what the government does.

If the government makes a law, a group of people complain. If the government later removes that same law that people kept whining about, another group of people complains. What to do?

Btw, another nice example is worldwide free trade. When it was introduced starting in the 1970s, people were very loud about the fact that they didn't like it because they feared competition from foreign markets, companies moving abroad (offshoring), and jobs at home being lost. That is largely exactly what happened (though free trade also had many positive sides like exchange of technology and culture). 50 years later, world governments (especially in the west) want to un-do free trade, and people complain again about it, citing a loss of free exchange of ideas as a reason. What to do.

Frankly, that's a stupid ass take.

Reality is not binary, we progress and evolve. The constant pressure to be better than yesterday is the reason we got where we are.

[–] PKscope@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

People complain because the law was poorly written, not because it is a bad idea.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›